300" Uncut

Some of you, out of curiosity, sat down and suffered through Mel’s “Jesus Chainsaw Massacre,” and came back to report on it. I thank you for doing that so I didn’t have to. I’ll return the favor and tell you about the movie that is sweeping America. It’s taken in $70m on opening weekend (WSJ Print ed.) and also reveals that the Right in this country is even more twisted than I had thought.

“300” is so much more than the uberviolent videogame it appears to be at first blush. Simply, it is a bloated, triumphalist tribute to the authoritarian, closeted homosexual imperialist. This movie has it all: racism, sexism, contempt for intellectuals, bloodshed enough to make Atilla blush, and an unapologetic, blatant, sadist homoeroticism that is tied to the heart of military cultures throughout time. I’ll give it this: if you’re a Drag Queen looking for your next White Party costume, this movie will inspire you like few others in history.

From start to finish, this movie presents the Authoritarian/Bush Republican construction of “manhood” that has kept certain intellectuals and scholars of sexuality in stitches or tears for the last six years. The heros are strong, hard, hard, strong men (the narration stresses that repeatedly) who take quick, bold, physical action, with little patience for deep thought or measured discussion. They speak in plain, simple terms, reminding everyone that they (and they alone) act to save “freedom” and “liberty.” They never stop to consider the contradiction such assertions bring, given that they live in a monarchy in which the ruler contemptuously ignores the advice of his pseudo-democratic advisory council. The ruler also gratuitously provokes the war in the most bloody and insulting way possible, and then rushes off to fight it before his people can prepare themselves adequately for the consequences. Rash and irresponsible action is presented as noble, bold leadership in the face of an impotent and contemptable governing majority.

The 300 fight against an enemy so terrible, it is understood as a disease upon the world, unleashed by inhuman monsters from hell. The 300 fight for the “free lands” while showing no fear of the “Asian hordes” which pollute the aesthetically pure, sparse landscapes of “Greek” shores like countless flies on a corpse. Most importantly, it is the fight that counts- victory is something that will come at some later date, after the brave heroes of this period in history have inspired a new generation with their legendary sacrifice and bravery. Indeed- if they had not all died in the end, the “free peoples of Greece” wouldn’t have developed the thirst for freedom that would last for a thousand years after this event.

But what truly amazes me is that there can only be two explanations of what the film’s makers thought they were doing. Either this is the highest in high camp, openly mocking the current authoritarian cultural narrative in terms so strong a child could understand it; or the film makers are the blind and sycophantic morAns of legend, people so culturally ignorant they don’t understand that to educated folks this is nothing more than ridiculous, childish fantasy and blatantly fascist propaganda. Most critics over the age of forty have had that reaction: revulsion, despair at the death of art, concern that the fabric of history has been torn irreparably and replaced with a narrative of comic book simplification. However, I think there is another important point that I’ve not seen in most reviews.

This is a gay, gay, gay film. Everyone in it is constructed with such strong gay subtext, I can hardly use the prefix “sub.” Although, subs and Doms everywhere will also appreciate the not-really coded moments splattered throughout the film. There are pedophilic elements in it, a contempt for women found in some misogynist gay male environments, and lesbian orgy and bondage scenes. Indeed, this film skirts the NC-17/X label by the thinnest of margins. I’m sure the “uncut” edition will make gay porn collections everywhere.

Let me be more specific. The actors who play the heroes are without exception Chippendale-grade bodybuilders, with jutting chins, pale skin, round blue eyes and silken, flowing hair. They are oiled to perfection and almost never shown in more than a red, red cape and tightly strapped leather loinclothes. Their muscles ripple and flex in the many slow-motion closeups in the battle sequences, their movements hypersexualized to the point of comedy. I was moved to start counting, and I don’t think a director could have put in more shots of long, hard weapons auspiciously placed in front of crotches. Spear after spear rises majestically from pounding, bulky thighs- always finishing in a “money shot” deeply thrusting into the flesh of ravening, almost sexually anticipating brown enemies.

The women are curiously boylike. The one heterosexual love scene is monochromatically androgynous, the “woman’s” small breasts reduced to little more than a soft young boy’s in the play of the blue light. The man in this scene is the model of the ancient Greek adult, the bearded citizen who is only gentle in the love of his beardless boy. The sequence ends with the clear implication of anal intercourse, a theme repeated in the rape scene of the female character later in the movie. Boys are not left out of the sexualization process of the movie’s characters, and are constantly shown grappling with adult men in little more than loinclothes, with much mutual chest patting and softly affectionate rubbing. The Symposium ideal has comes to modern comic book film.

The sexualization of the Other as understood in racist narrative is the core of this movie. The threat to “freedom” and “liberty” is in fact the threat of homosexual desire for the decadent, wildly effeminate, completely alien and nonwhite un-human that is “Xerxes” and his followers, most of whom are clearly not white. I am not shitting you when I say that for the first few seconds, I thought they had hired RuPaul for this role. It has been a long, long time since I’ve seen a Drag Queen this fabulous, from the sparkling metallic eyeshadow to the painfully arching eyebrows painted on with the precision of Chinese calligraphy. Xerxes’ many piercings and chains contrast with his muscular nakedness, and only reinforce the the Drag Queen understanding of his character- and then there are those long, painted nails. The movie’s sound editor modifies the voice of this eight foot marvel of tranny beauty into a completely artificial and deep, lilting contralto. It is constantly and devilishly evocative of lust and perversion.

The key scene for this character comes early, when s/he majestically strolls down from a gilded pyramid of a palanquin, then walking across the backs of sniveling, kneeling slaves to face the Spartan hero-King shortly after first scenes battle. Spartan Leonidas, showing his disdain and fearlessness, stands with his back to Xerxes. The naked, chain covered Xerxes whispers in Leonidas’ ears of the God-King’s naughty servants, and the “lashings” that come before they “kneel to him” while lacquered, impossibly long fingers stroke masculine Spartan shoulders that practically tremble in shuttered, forbidden desire. For the rest of the film, over and over again, Xerxes and his representatives demand that Leonidas “kneel to him,” and the Dom/sub implications could not be clearer.

I’m going to stop here, because if I don’t, this will become Corrente’s finest hour in pr0n- I’m not even half done describing all the homoerotic moments packed into the two hour paen to authoritarian sexuality. But while I am sexually sophisticated enough to unpack this movie for what it is, it is telling that the surface impression is basically of a cross between a Marine recruiting commercial and a Manga themed video game. Clearly, all too clearly, this movie is designed to appeal to uneducated, psychosexually stressed, brainwashed young white men from the heartland and other isolated regions. It segues neatly into doctored FOX news reports and graphic images about our many “victories” in the war on terror and the many threats posed by the “Islamofascist hoardes.” Poor, angry young men who have been told for the last six years that they must make war on all folks brown and gay and different will respond to this movie, and within them the seed of authoritarian closeted homosexuality will take root. One need not be “homosexual” to play the authoritarian sex/power/oppresion game. Matt Sanchez, anyone?

While truly a fascinating experience on the whole, I can’t recommend you add to the coffers of those who created this, or who will be using it to continue their imperialist adventures. But do not underestimate its power or its message. The Authoritarians have given us the clearest glimpse into their fantasy, the fantasy with which they have crafted almost every one of their policies. It’s disturbing, and the plainest indication that they must not only be removed from power, but never allowed to hold it again. Not because of the “perverted sex,” but because it speaks of an empitness, a lust for oppression and domination, that has no place in democratic, compassionate government or humane, affirmative society.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

So, an exercise in Fuhrergefluffen?

If “exercise” is the word I want.

Am I correct in recalling the wingers were worried because “Xer[x?]es” might be taken for Bush?

If so, there’s more than a little denial going on there, eh?

(Nice work, Babs. Why, indeed, waste your beautiful mind with all this mano on mano [snicker] stuff?)

No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.

Bwahaha!

I’m glad you liked that Fuhrergefluffen bit, Lambert!

As to CD’s review—

I went to see “300” last night, and I need to concur with CD on this one.

The filmmakers apparently failed to read the original tale of the Battle of Thermopylae in Herodotus’ “History,” and only breezed through Frank Miller’s graphic novel series long enough to get the gist of “lots of blood, and naked Spartans, and sepia tones.”

Honestly, I expected Xerxes to rise up off his pageant wagon to start singing “Don’t Dream It— Be It,” or a reprise of Herod’s Song, “So You Are The Christ,” from JC Superstar.

Chippendale’s must have been closed for the making of this film, and S/M shops nationwide must have been nearly sold out.

GAH! What a mess this film is.

—mf

From High Atop The Mighty Corrente Building… Comes Wisdom.

Let you know what I think...

…after I see it Wednesday. As a guy who read a lot about the history of this period I’d be loath to compare the mores and structure of society from that time with anybody living today.

Spartans were not democrats and….

They had a truly strange and, to many of us living today, repulsive society.

Persians…

Well they were pretty different also.

More later.

Saving Ryan's Privates

This is quite possibly the first reveiw I have ever read in which I could have used a warm, wet washcloth at the finish. I haven’t seen the film—and will not—but read in the L.A. Times a few days ago a short piece (no, I’m not going to look for it online) about how Marines were responding enthusiastically to the film. Yesterday, a rather sober letter writer in the opinion section pointed out that our Marines, who embraced the Spartans as the Heros, did not consider that the “300” were defenders, not invaders, and proudly died to ward off the attackers. Get it? The Marines are invaders these days, and the Iraqis are (at least superficially) the Spartans, in case anyone wondered about that.

Secondly, I have been working as an EMT for the past six months—many of my co-workers are at least twenty years younger than me (now don’t get excited—we’re just friends). This group is largely conservative, and many of these young men have spoken glowingly of the film. Glowingly. Perhaps the sublimation of same-sex desire is the new drug that our Corporate Masters will dispense into the cultural soup. We shall see.

Excellent review, CD!

+++

Except Frank Miller can't see the future

The comic was written several years ago and the issues published from 1998-1999. The movie “300” is practically panel for panel from the comic book.

You can try to wedge it in to the current political situation but it would be similar to the “V for Vendetta” arguments from last year and that was published nearly 20 years before it was made into a film.

Finally, Frank Miller is very nearly incapable of writing women unless they are lesbians, strippers, ninja, or a combination of the three.

just try telling an ex-Marine

the military is a homosexual institution.

We’d be better off with Fish Speakers.

No Hell below us
Above us, only sky

ahem, kelley b: i'm standing right here. anon- miller

may not have “seen the future” but it’s not like the authoritarian culture i’m describing was born in 2000. PNAC has been around since the clinton days, writing their own “academic” brand of this same sort of imperialist, authoritarian psychosexual bullshit. miller just seems to have tapped into the low brow version of it.

besides, there are books, and there are screen plays, and there are movies. there are many books written from decades past which can be reinterpreted and made to apply to modern political purposes. gosh, what a long list of those that the bushies would love to come to the screen and be popular. that’s the wonder of film- anything and everything can be made to seem “right now.”

miller isn’t “responsible,” but he’s also not innocent. but that’s not may point. my point is how the current authoritarians are using his work. which, given how well this series plays into the immediate political narrative, seems to be “pretty well” to me. and i notice that they aren’t doing miller’s “an american dream: home and garden,” etc. for which i give him great credit. but not them. then again, maybe president hillary’s folks in hollywood will get to that…

indeed you are!

You’d’ve made a good Fish Speaker, too, but you’re much too Bene Gesserit to have a God-Emperor.

No Hell below us
Above us, only sky

the fish speakers lacked autonomy

and for that, i wouldn’t want to be one of them. the bene gesserit of “chapterhouse” perhaps. unfinished, i still think herbert’s ultimate conclusion of the use of power was for…love.

although i do like the idea of the siyanoq.

Recommend CD's diary!

If you have a Kos account, here.

And CD, read the commment Here.

I just handled that issue here.

Terrific post.

No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.

already done, lb

i bow to the god of tags. goddess, the comments over there are silly and funny.

Relax

Relax already. It’s a movie. Made purely to be entertaining. Unlike Fahrenheit 911. Anyone who actually believes that real world politics can be accurately shown in a movie is completely brain dead. And yes it was a good movie, No it isn’t a good model for behavior in real world situations.

I've heard "it's only entertainment" before

Generally when Limbaugh or Coulter is calling for the execution of traitors like me.

So forgive me, anonymous, if I don’t find your comment reassuring.

No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.

Fair Enough

I see what you mean, and hate Limbaugh and Coulter too. Sorry I didn’t put my name there the first time. They defiantly aren’t entertainment. But we do need to have entertainment without always critiquing every detail like it was real life. There is a need for both sides, the political, and the muscle. But considering the majority of movies seem to have the other bias, can’t we just enjoy them, and have debates on real life issues?

"Just a Movie"

Relax already. It’s a movie.

So was “Birth of a Nation”.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_of_a_nation

The Birth of a Nation has been linked to the second emergence of the Ku Klux Klan, which was revived the year of the film’s release after a period of non-existence, and to changing Northern public opinion toward the South. Before Birth of a Nation, the white South remained bitter toward the Northern states and federal government, for both the disastrous Civil War and for the trampling of the former Confederacy that accompanied Reconstruction. Despite the passage of fifty years, a strong pro-Confederate idealism remained in the South and impeded national ideological reunification. Birth of a Nation attempts to unite Northern and Southern opinions into a cohesive nationalism, partly by blaming the present divisions on carpetbagging blacks and Reconstructionists. It carefully avoids criticism of Northern heroes such as Abraham Lincoln, and portrays both the Union and Confederate armies as heroic fighters, and featuring protagonists from both sides. While the Industrial North is not portrayed in a flattering light, this in itself was not necessarily hostile to Northern public opinion, as industrial workers generally did not like their working conditions. Working-class Northerners were thus also led to sympathize with an idealized agrarian society. The success of this attempt was demonstrated by the strength of the reformed KKK

Just a movie

I can’t help it that people are too stupid to keep reality and movie separate. From the wikipedia link you posted it seems that the intent was propaganda. I don’t think that is the intent of 300. And I made no connection from the Persians in the movie to the Iranians of today. People need to use more commons sense, we can’t stop everything that you or I don’t like. With a group of as few as 10 people we would end up baning 99 percent of all media. What ever happened to free speech? It’s not that I disagree with the review, however, It is a good movie in the purely entertainment sense. Not good in the way that “V for Vendetta”, or “Serenity” is though, they make you think. Some movies can have the power to sway peoples opinions, but 300 isn’t one, and isn’t intended too.

you don't think it's propaganda, mike, but i do

so we have different opinions. that’s the place in which we need to “relax.” thankfully, we can still do that, as it’s a (mostly) free country.