Annals of career "progressive" idiocy
Primary tabs
Submitted by lambert on Fri, 06/15/2012 - 3:04pm
Shorter Booman, and shortening this one is a blessing, believe me: Vote for Obama, because whacking US citizens without due process is good. Anyhow, it might be!
For all the subtlety and nuance and yadda yadda yadda, that's a key point Greenwald makes that BooMan doesn't engage. For obvious reasons, I would think.

- lambert's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Loading the comments is worth the effort
Aside from Greenwald, What a bedraggled mess of commenters. I haven't visited there in a year or more and am feeling kind of stunned.
Actually I'm wrong
There ARE commenters who don't go along with Booman's logic
You were close enough the first time
The most surprising thing to me these past several years is to discover that for years I've been aligned with people who are pretty much the mirror image of the wannabe bullies on the right. I knew going in that a lot of my teammates were stuck in some sort of unending fantasy that they were heroes in the thick of an ongoing '60s civil rights drama but I never realized they could throw a switch and become such obnoxious swaggering front runners.
I know -- it's a pretty ugly thread
But, there are some who stood up for Glen so I thought I should mention it.
(sighing) I guess Progressive officially means Remote Controlled Drone Bombing and Tuesday Morning Kill Meetings.
Great comment here:
"Just as important as getting the monsters is not becoming them ourselves, don't you think?"
delayed reaction
Thinking about the handcuffed frog ** and (pardon the expression) laughing my ass off. Presumably there's an exception for politicians who participate in the Kill Tuesday Meetings and support Robot Drone Bombings.
** From the Booman Tribune FAQ:
Yes, that's how the blogosphere thought of itself...
... back in the beginning. Sad! Corrente has become, I suppose, a place for "users to band together to do Op-Eds" -- or books, actually (and serials, too, like Plantidotes and Unemployed Cats). Both good!
Investigative journalism takes real funding, though..