Sun, 03/16/2008 - 10:22am — lambert
Josh:
Sen. Clinton's final net delegate haul out of her decisive win in Ohio was only 9 delegates.
Meanwhile, Attaturk at Lord Eschaton's points out:
Obama gains a net of 10 delegates in Iowa, while a net of 9 delegates is what Clinton obtained over Obama with a substantial win in Ohio eleven days ago.
No problem at all. No sireee bob.
Not even a cloud in the sky. Same deal with the discrepancy between the popular vote with a secret ballot in TX and the undemocratic caucuses....
NOTE See under "rotten boroughs" and "pocket boroughs" here.
»
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Front page
Comments
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.......
......maybe it will fit here.
Obama?
.....a gona?
Gallup national daily tracking poll now shows Hillary leading 47/45, and a week ago, Obama was ahead by 8 points.
He’s dropping like a rock.
Maybe.
A. Citizen
Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.
....... ...... ......... .......!
....... ..... .. .....?
.. ...... .... ....... .
Nope, No Problem Here
Just because in addition to Michigan and Florida, we also still don't have the Texas caucus results and the Texas Democratic Party so far won't agree - despite the widespread reports of problems at the caucuses, to check its paper trail for the caucuses. Nothing wrong with any of that, nothing at all. Great system for picking a candidate and/or president.
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/3/16/1121...
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/...
Got links on TX caucus problems?
I keep reading about it, but I've been too lazy to try to find the roundup.
[x] Any (D) in the general. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi