August 2009

Comedy Relief: "Society Holds Conservatives To A Higher Standard."

So claimeth one Eva Lorraine Molina in a diatribe against the behavior of women in general and conservative undergraduettes in particular, which gets the treatment it deserves at Firedoglake: Hee hee. Our society doesn't even hold conservatives to the standard of being against torture or being for decent healthcare. But we do concede that you sincerely hate gay people, so it balances out. Also, Tom DeLay.

New Orleans Could Be As Safe As Amsterdam!

The man credited with pulling the Crescent City out of the muck might be going to go after David Vitter's seat in the Senate. That's a start. Work's ongoing for a hospital -- a joint venture with LSU and Tulane -- to replace the sorely-missed Big Charity Hospital.

So it makes sense to take care of all of New Orleans, at least half of which isn't really below sea level.

We know that the funds to repair the coast of five states -- Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana -- after three big hurricanes -- Wilma, Katrina, and Rita -- were allocated. But allocation isn't provision, and money isn't flood control. Take a look at how it's done in Holland:

and give a listen to the advice of the Netherlanders on "Yes, we can!" then   Read more…

The public option is an advertising slogan

I really don't get Atiros, WKJM, and FDL.

There is no public option worthy of the name. If anyone was serious about providing one, it would have surfaced by now. Single payer advocates are calling for HR 676 and failing that, the Kucinich amendment that would allow states to use their Medicare/Medicaid funds to pay for their state single payer plans. We are advocating for specific legislation.

TARP banks pay back some loans: Treasury reaps some profits

In news you may not have heard yet: Some big banks and some not-so-big banks are repaying their bailout money, and the US Treasury is actually seeing a profit.

“The taxpayers want their money back and they want the government out of our banking system,” Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican and a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel examining the relief program, said in an interview.

Profits were hardly high on the list of government priorities last October, when a financial panic was in full swing and the Treasury Department started spending roughly $240 billion to buy preferred shares from hundreds of banks that were facing huge potential losses from troubled mortgages. Bank stocks began teetering after Lehman Brothers collapsed and the government rescued A.I.G., and fear gripped the financial industry around the world.
...
But critics at the time warned that taxpayers might not see any profits, and that it could take years for the banks to repay the loans.

As Congress debated the bailout bill last September that would authorize the Treasury Department to spend up to $700 billion to stem the financial crisis, Representative Mac Thornberry, Republican of Texas, said: “Seven hundred billion dollars of taxpayer money should not be used as a hopeful experiment.”

So far, that experiment is more than paying off. The government has taken profits of about $1.4 billion on its investment in Goldman Sachs, $1.3 billion on Morgan Stanley and $414 million on American Express. The five other banks that repaid the government — Northern Trust, Bank of New York Mellon, State Street, U.S. Bancorp and BB&T — each brought in $100 million to $334 million in profit.

The figure does not include the roughly $35 million the government has earned from 14 smaller banks that have paid back their loans. The government bought shares in these and many other financial companies last fall, when sinking confidence among investors pushed down many bank stocks to just a few dollars a share. As the banks strengthened and became profitable, the government authorized them to pay back the preferred stock, which had been paying quarterly dividends since October.

.

Hmm. So it appears that Texas' House Republicans,

Oopsie

Krugman:

But the Nixon era was a time in which leading figures in both parties were capable of speaking rationally about policy, and in which policy decisions weren’t as warped by corporate cash as they are now. America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system’s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.

I’m not saying that reformers should give up. They do, however, have to realize what they’re up against. There was a lot of talk last year about how Barack Obama would be a “transformational” president — but true transformation, it turns out, requires a lot more than electing one telegenic leader. Actually turning this country around is going to take years of siege warfare against deeply entrenched interests, defending a deeply dysfunctional political system.

Well, the country isn't being governed right now.

"[A] natural presence, comfortable"

Natural like a natural aristocracy. [gag. spew.]

Light posting

I had connectivity problems over the weekend, and I'm still catching up. So, light posting from me.

Harry Shearer: Obama threw NOLA under the bus

One of the hilarious things about Shearer's article is how the talking points show up in it, even "he's only been in office for a month/two months/three months"! And the moral? The inside game doesn't work. Listening, "progressives"? HuffPo:

After I started noticing the absence of any public words (let alone actions) on [rebuilding the levees and the wetlands] from the new administration, several commenters here criticized me for, in essence, just running my mouth. "You're a celebrity," they mis-advised me, "go talk directly to the White House about it, like Brad Pitt." I thought I should start my Pitt emulation slowly at first, maybe by wooing Angelina Jolie, but after a couple of weeks, I took the challenge to play the inside game. I haven't written about it until now, because I wanted to see how it would play out before drawing conclusions.

Here's how it played out:

The government got between me and my doctor

I got a letter from the government, saying that they contacted my doctor and made him replace a daily prescription of mine with another drug of their choosing.

They were kind enough to allow me to finish my current bottle before experimenting with the cheaper (for them -- same cost to me) product. Wasn't that generous of them?

Oh, wait, that wasn't the government. That was my health insurer. No problem, then!

I sure hope we get a "uniquely American" solution that keeps these swell folks in charge of our nation's health care.

Help Corrente ...

... keep the heat on!

Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.

No PayPal Account required! Thank you!

Recent comments

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.