<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>chicago dyke's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/chicago_dyke"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/15/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/blog/15/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-11-15T23:24:40-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Not Even a Billion, So Who Cares? FCC Gives Away Your Money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/not_even_billion_so_who_cares_fcc_gives_away_your_money" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/not_even_billion_so_who_cares_fcc_gives_away_your_money</id>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:41:50-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-04T12:41:50-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Republican Playbook" />
    <category term="Department of the Missing Media Critique" />
    <category term="bailing out corporations as a form of governing" />
    <category term="FCC" />
    <category term="USF" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081201-fcc-usf-telcos-received-over-970-million-in-erroneous-payments.html">ArsT:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
A key program in the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund overpaid telecommunications carriers by almost a billion dollars from July 2006 through June 2007. This disclosure, which is sure to provoke more cries for a massive overhaul of the USF, comes from a preliminary FCC audit of the USF's High Cost fund released just before Thanksgiving. The review says that 23.3% of the payments the USF made to telcos were "erroneous"—that's up from an earlier  estimate of 16.6 percent. The latest total comes to $970.3 million in bad payouts.<br />
FCC cracks down on Universal Service Fund cheats<br />
Universal Service Fund should be "blown up" like Death Star</p>
<p>The Commission says that this money cannot be recovered, because it is based on a random sample audit of USF beneficiaries. "In order to recover erroneous payments that are approximately $970.3 million," the Office of Inspector Generals' (OIG) report observes, "an audit of the entire population of High Cost beneficiaries would be necessary." This also suggests that the actual total sum of incorrect grants could be much higher than what the audit found.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>I mean, we wouldn't want to have to do an audit, heavens forfend, no! That could cost money.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Fun Part About &quot;Man-made&quot; is that Any (Wo)man can Make It</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/fun_part_about_man_made_any_woman_can_make_it" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/fun_part_about_man_made_any_woman_can_make_it</id>
    <published>2008-12-02T20:00:10-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-02T20:00:10-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Gay, Ghey, Gai!" />
    <category term="Theocracy Rising" />
    <category term="Department of If I Don&#039;t Laugh I&#039;ll Cry" />
    <category term="bible" />
    <category term="christian theology" />
    <category term="gay culture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Ho, ho, Correntians. I'm fairly sure I'm the first here to link to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/01/princess-diana-gay-bible">this.</a> And galdurnit, don't tell me if I'm wrong, in the holiday spirit of Don't Ask Don't Tell. Baby Jeebus cries if you do. Even so, Haw! I love this kind of shit:</p>
<blockquote><p>
A gay version of the Bible, in which God says it is better to be gay than straight, is to be published by an American film producer.</p>
<p>New Mexico-based Revision Studios will publish The Princess Diana Bible – so named because of Diana's "many good works", it says – online at princessdianabible.com in spring 2009. A preview of Genesis is already available, in which instead of creating Adam and Eve, God creates Aida and Eve.</p>
<p>"And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Aida, and she slept: and he took one of her ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib, which the Lord God had taken from woman, made he another woman, and brought her unto the first. And Aida said, 'This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of me. Therefore shall a woman leave her mother, and shall cleave unto her wife: and they shall be one flesh.' And they were both naked, the woman and her wife, and were not ashamed."</p>
<p>The film studio said it would also adapt and direct the revised Bible as a two-part mini-series, The Gay Old Testament and The Gay New Testament, once it is completed.</p>
<p>"There are many different versions of the Bible; I don't see why we can't have one," said Max Mitchell, who directed the science fiction comedy Horror in the Wind, in which an airborne formula invented by two biogeneticists reverses the world's sexual orientation.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Atheist Rage In KY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/atheist_rage_ky" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/atheist_rage_ky</id>
    <published>2008-12-02T12:51:22-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-02T12:51:22-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Theocracy Rising" />
    <category term="Department of If I Don&#039;t Laugh I&#039;ll Cry" />
    <category term="homeland security" />
    <category term="KY" />
    <category term="religion" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/56824.html">Haw.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
An atheists-rights group is suing the Kentucky Office of Homeland Security because state law requires the agency to stress "dependence on Almighty God as being vital to the security of the Commonwealth." </p>
<p>American Atheists of Parsippany, N.J., and 10 non-religious Kentuckians are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, set to be filed Tuesday in Franklin Circuit Court.</p>
<p>Edwin Kagin, a Boone County lawyer and the national legal director of American Atheists, said he was appalled to read in the Herald-Leader last week that state law establishes praising God — and installing a plaque in God's honor — as the first duty of the Homeland Security Office. </p>
<p>The state and federal constitutions both prohibit government from getting involved in religion, Kagin said Monday.</p>
<p>"This is one of the most outrageous things I've seen in 35 years of practicing law. It's breathtakingly unconstitutional," Kagin said.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes. Yes, it is. Go KY atheists! And FSM be praised for McClatchy for bringing us this news.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Damn Fine Essay from DDay on &quot;Conservatism&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/damn_fine_essay_dday_conservatism" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/damn_fine_essay_dday_conservatism</id>
    <published>2008-12-01T13:41:28-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T13:41:28-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Republican Playbook" />
    <category term="Republicans vs. the Constitution" />
    <category term="Department of No! They Would Never to Do That!" />
    <category term="change" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="rule of law" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/nothing-conservative-about-it-by-dday.html">The whole thing is very good.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This goes to the other side of how this nation is changing radically - with a series of programs conceived largely by executive fiat that weakens civil liberties protections and subverts the plain letter of the law. This includes illegal wiretapping of American citizens, indefinite detention of prisoners without charges, and the dehumanizing practice of torture, which is ineffective and deeply dangerous to the lives of our troops, as this senior interrogator in Iraq explains.<br />
...</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Irony Dead, but Propaganda is Alive and Well in Afghanistan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/irony_dead_propaganda_alive_and_well_afghanistan" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/irony_dead_propaganda_alive_and_well_afghanistan</id>
    <published>2008-12-01T13:02:03-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T13:02:03-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Department of Eerie Historical Parallels" />
    <category term="afghanistan" />
    <category term="propaganda" />
    <category term="psy-ops" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Feeling rather unclever today, I don't have the snappy intro I wish I could have for <a href="http://www.moonofalabama.org/2008/11/afghanistan-mer.html">this:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>KABUL (Reuters) - The U.S. general commanding NATO forces in Afghanistan has ordered a merger of the office that releases news with "Psy Ops," which deals with propaganda, a move that goes against the alliance's policy, three officials said.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lying Our Way Into the Future</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/lying_our_way_future" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/lying_our_way_future</id>
    <published>2008-12-01T10:37:42-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T10:37:42-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Republican Lying" />
    <category term="Republican Playbook" />
    <category term="Department of Eerie Historical Parallels" />
    <category term="gender" />
    <category term="lying" />
    <category term="youth ethics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2008_11_01_archive.html#8893740907459950074">Suzie</a> asks some important questions concerning <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/STUDENTS_DISHONESTY?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">this report on young people's ethics</a>. It doesn't surprise me at all that more boys than girls believe that lying and cheating are necessary for success in life. Now, I'm not one to bemoan Those Kids Today, as I've been doing some reading on 18thc politics and know we've got a long way to go before we hit rock bottom. But I do think that another point that should be raised re: this endemic of cheating and lying is that politics have far reaching consequences, and to me that is reflected in the survey. If the President and high elected officials lie like rugs and no one calls them on it, why shouldn't young people take that as a model and example? </p>
<p>Personally, I've come to understand that educators must take real care, and guard against cheating and lying, when it comes to teens today. There's a certain culture that crosses races and income levels, which lauds those teens who are able to 'get away with it,' whatever it may be. Again, I don't think this is too different than when I was a teen, or before that, but I think that teens who adopt this aesthetic will carry it on into adulthood, unless some authority in their lives teaches them that there are serious consequences. </p>
<p>It will be interesting, as the coming population wave assumes political and cultural power, in the many battles in which we find ourselves engaged today. People who don't believe that lying and cheating are great evils to be avoided will be more or less likely oppose gay marriage? More or less likely to believe that our nation should be engaged in wars of choice? More or less concerned with government spying? More or less tolerant of "the war on drugs?" I don't know the answer to any of that, but I suspect the political scene will be different, when this generation begins to exhibit its peak influence. </p>
<p>I think of this as one of those "what comes around, goes around" sort of things. Republicans have enshrined lying and cheating as legitimate forms of public behavior, and Democrats have failed to oppose that in a significant way. Soon, we'll get to find out just what it's like when a large portion of the population shares those beliefs. Short form: if the rubes don't follow the rules set up for them, it's a lot harder to suck up obscene profits from their enslavement.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Interesting Take on the Newspaper Business</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/interesting_take_newspaper_business" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/interesting_take_newspaper_business</id>
    <published>2008-12-01T09:57:55-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T09:57:55-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Double-Ply Journalism" />
    <category term="Department of No! They Would Never to Do That!" />
    <category term="gannet" />
    <category term="Newspapers" />
    <category term="reporting" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>It has gotten to the point where Mr. A takes away the sharp objects at the table when someone brings up "the terrible times facing newspapers these days" or "isn't it just awful how no one reads anymore." Newspapers make plenty of money. PLENTY of money. They are wildly successful businesses. If you or I owned them we'd be jumping for joy. </p>
<p>They just don't make enough money to satisfy the greedy, rapacious assholes who own and run them. This isn't a death, you know. It's a homicide. Newspapers aren't dying. They're being murdered. And until somebody convenes an academic conference on how to overthrow these fuckers and raise funds for employee buyouts of every last one of these newspapers you cannot pay me in solid gold ingots to listen to one more stupid lecture about the Internet.</p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Worried  Librul Holiday Pickles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/worried-librul-holiday-pickles-0" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/worried-librul-holiday-pickles-0</id>
    <published>2008-11-22T20:22:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-22T20:22:31-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Environmental Apocalypse" />
    <category term="Department of Il faut cultiver notre jardin" />
    <category term="brine" />
    <category term="investing" />
    <category term="markets" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>So I have some kweshuns for you:</p>
<p>How worried are you, at this point, at much of the econ news that's coming down the pipe right now? How are you faring, personally, and how are your fortunes, for what they are, growing or shinking or otherwise changing? I love Meaningless Personal Anecdotes, I'd love to hear yours. </p>
<p>Also: have you ever made "brine pickles?" If so, how'd they turn out? Where did you 'age' them? What veggies did you use? There's this brand of Israeli pickles I love, with the very simplest of ingredients. But they're brined, and I'm not willing to do that...yet. Have you? Did it work out? What did you use?</p>
<p>I'm fortunate, this year at least. I found/saved up enough to put up a very nice holiday table. I may not be able to buy such luxe again, soon. So I'm all about Grandma's Special Recipe and any gourmet touches you've found to add to your homegrown. I invite all area liberals to my "family is gone away for the holiday visit" party at my post-Thanksgiving holiday weekend party this year, and likely others in future gawdless holidays. I don't think I can stand to read about one more "my family called and said we won't be talking politics this year" dinner request/invite/command. Call me crazy, but no one tells me what I can say, or not, at the dinnertable. Evah.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Humor for Those Who Still Have It</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/humor-those-who-still-have-it" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/humor-those-who-still-have-it</id>
    <published>2008-11-20T23:37:03-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-20T23:37:03-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Haves, Have Nots, and Have Mores" />
    <category term="Department of If I Don&#039;t Laugh I&#039;ll Cry" />
    <category term="historical parallels" />
    <category term="Mel Brooks" />
    <category term="right now" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ Bailout humor, anyone? SFW, even. "Mooooooo-ney. Moooney." Heh. For Ali.
<p>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hyw_o6P6-WQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hyw_o6P6-WQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Simple and Elegant Brilliance from BAR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/simple-and-elegant-brilliance-bar" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/simple-and-elegant-brilliance-bar</id>
    <published>2008-11-19T20:06:30-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-19T20:06:30-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Dems Who Don&#039;t Suck" />
    <category term="Department of Eerie Historical Parallels" />
    <category term="fact" />
    <category term="history" />
    <category term="truth" />
    <category term="what it means to be a Little Person" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>I know this is linked to below, and that <a href="http://sideshow.me.uk/">Avedon has joined the bandwagon,</a> but I think this simple point is worth repeating, over and over and over. Call *me* boring, I can hack it, but don't dismiss the essential truth of <a href="http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=897&amp;Itemid=1">this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
No presidential administration keeps its promises without relentless pressure from below.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>From the American Revolution to the Civil War, abolition to women's rights, the Civil rights era to Stonewall, it's the same story every time. Ugly, poor, fat, tranny, unhip, powerless, "criminal," outcast, unpopular, drug using, cat loving, "loosers" have been at the forefront, in the vaanguard, the most vocal and far-seeing, when it comes to progressive change. You can add "unpopular C list bloggers" to that list, now. But the bottom line is that no one listens to "people like us," until they do, because they have to. On so many issues (FISA, Iraq, the "bailout," health care) we're sofa king right, and have the only real and lasting solutions, and everybody else, no matter how well connected, paid, or "popular," are wrong and will be proven so, in the "meaningless" eyes of historians, people who benefit from the programs we advocate, and those millions of current and future generations not killed or forced to suffer so that a few hundred rich people can be richer. I know this in "my soul." More importantly, the history of the West, the religious wars, and science, back me up.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cheney and Gonzales Indicted: Sounds Like a Real Party Down There!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/cheney-and-gonzales-indicted-sounds-real-party-down-there" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/cheney-and-gonzales-indicted-sounds-real-party-down-there</id>
    <published>2008-11-19T04:54:51-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-19T05:08:58-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Bush Torture Policies" />
    <category term="Republican Lawbreaking" />
    <category term="Department of Genocide, Torture, and Tyranny" />
    <category term="cheney" />
    <category term="gonzales" />
    <category term="prisons" />
    <category term="TX" />
    <category term="Wackenhut" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>I confess: I have no idea what's going on down there in TX. I do know: 1)Cheney is a monster 2)Gonzo is a liar 3)The American prison system is a horror and 4)It's a time-honored Republican tactic to muddy the waters and meddle with those seeking to prosecute them, by employing countering lawsuits and legal claims.</p>
<p>Anyway, this sounds like a carnival of corruption and anyone who knows more about this should chime in. <a href="http://www.offthekuff.com/mt/archives2/2008/11/012829.html#012829">Via Off the Kuff</a>, <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6119459.html">and the local SCLM:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
McALLEN — A South Texas grand jury has indicted Vice President Dick Cheney and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on state charges related to the alleged abuse of prisoners in Willacy County's federal detention centers.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>There are more links at Off the Kuff, and someone else suggested that it could be useful for bloggers to peruse the SEIU's <a href="//www.eyeonwackenhut.com/">Eye on Wackenhut</a> for related background details.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lazy and Sloppy are Two Words I Don&#039;t Like Using about the ProgBlog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/lazy-and-sloppy-are-two-words-i-dont-using-about-progblog" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/lazy-and-sloppy-are-two-words-i-dont-using-about-progblog</id>
    <published>2008-11-19T04:41:53-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-19T04:41:53-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Dems Who Don&#039;t Suck" />
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Department of Stop it! You&#039;re killing me!" />
    <category term="blogosphere" />
    <category term="Clinton officials" />
    <category term="Obama administration" />
    <category term="sirota" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=10022">Annoyingly sloppy, David.</a></p>
<p>Look, there's one thing that the blogosphere can and should do well: provide the details. It's really great that David put up this anti-Clinton screed (and if it's not, it's a bad attempt not to be) at a site that allows comments; at least we get the chance in the comments to remind him that it's important to put his money where his mouth is. But now is the time when Hard Data is really necessary, and really useful, and he doesn't give us any. </p>
<p>Unlike a lot of people, I tend to enjoy much of David's work. As I said in the comments, I can understand, ahem, "both sides" of the argument. On the one hand, I don't believe that many Establishment Villagers can or want to do what it takes to solve the real, pressing problems this country is facing. Many "permanent Villagers" really are too concerned with Insider Baseballism and the pecking order in the Beltway to work hard for the policy change we desperately need. On the other hand, I think that there are *some* experienced, decent, actually liberal or progressive former Clintonians, and just because they worked for the last Democratic president doesn't mean they shouldn't work for the newest one.</p>
<p>Data is good. Facts are good. It's not that fucking hard to make a list, and back it up with links. As they used to say in journalism skoolz: Who? What? Where? When? Why? It would've been really great if David had answered any of those questions, rather than just making a throwaway claim about his evelope backsides, or whatever. You really should've tried harder, D. You're not living up to the High Standards of the Blogosphere, but instead acting like the very Village Insiders you claim to dislike.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>We Should Start A List</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/we-should-start-list" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/we-should-start-list</id>
    <published>2008-11-18T15:27:01-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-18T15:27:01-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Impeachment" />
    <category term="Department of No! They Would Never to Do That!" />
    <category term="Democrats" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="progressive treason" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>So I included "impeachment" in the tags because I've got a dollar right here that says, before his first term is over, one or another Congresscritter is going to ride the wave of the guaranteed to happen future Obama-hating by introducing a bill of impeachment against him, esp as the Bailout fallout speeds the rate at which the economy tanks and nothing gets better for Little People, and brighter Republicans take advantage of the natural opportunity Obama and his bailout buddies have provided them.  But I had the thought, even as I realize this blog is already sort of a running one, that we should create "The List" of Obama's various betrayals and failures to live up to his label of "Democrat" and otherwise chooses to shit upon the progressive and liberal element to his party. I'm betting it's going to be a long list, over the next four years. And Oborg members: please don't whine at me that "he's not yet in office." If you think he's not already directing the actions and statements of the Dem party as its leader, you don't know much about how the Village works. I said I'd wait until after the election and I lived up to that. Now, I want my promised results. Or does "compromise" and "unity" only mean such between center-rightists and far-right theocrats and neocons? Sorry, but lefties like me aren't going away, and we're not going to shut up. </p>
<p>I'll go first. </p>
<p>1. Ordering Senate Dems to "make nice" with Lieberman, and allow him to keep his chair and other Senate privs, in the name of "working together." Hint from the Wise, Mr. President-Elect: you can't do business with traitors who stab you in the back (and front). They'll fuck you over every time.</p>
<p>Your turn, Gentle Readers.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Would Caesar Do? or, On the Trip to London</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/content/what-would-caesar-do-or-trip-london" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/content/what-would-caesar-do-or-trip-london</id>
    <published>2008-11-18T15:08:37-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-18T15:08:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Gay, Ghey, Gai!" />
    <category term="Haves, Have Nots, and Have Mores" />
    <category term="Department of The Happy Dance" />
    <category term="bangers and mash" />
    <category term="England" />
    <category term="London" />
    <category term="sightseeing" />
    <category term="travel" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>So, if you got a free trip to London, all expenses paid, and you'd never been there before, what would you do? Seven days and nights, no strings attached, enough money to have a good time high and low. Cause, that's me, next month. Suggestions for this inexperienced, ignorant Flatlander? Obviously, those of you who are gaii and done The City, I beg you to pipe up. </p>
<p>...at least I don't have to learn a new language.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Saturday Night Silent Film Blogging: Ph&#039;nglui mglw&#039;nafh Cthulhu R&#039;lyeh wgah&#039;nagl fhtagn!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/saturday_night_silent_film_blogging_phnglui_mglwnafh_cthulhu_rlyeh_wgahnagl_fhtagn" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/saturday_night_silent_film_blogging_phnglui_mglwnafh_cthulhu_rlyeh_wgahnagl_fhtagn</id>
    <published>2008-11-15T23:24:40-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-15T23:24:40-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Meta-meta" />
    <category term="Department of If I Don&#039;t Laugh I&#039;ll Cry" />
    <category term="Cthulhu" />
    <category term="low budgets" />
    <category term="silent film" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ Sometimes, it's good to be human. I confess: I really enjoyed this film short. The best part about renting the disc was the 'special features,' in which the producers and actors revealed just how fun and silly it is to be part of a low-budget film production. Netflix is good; I'd never have come across it any other way. Rent it; it's safe for little kids and fun for anyone who loves B Sci-Fi, or has fond memories of the silent film age. Cardboard! Melted garbage bags! Dark lipstick on men! It's hard to pack more fun into 47 minutes of "horror" than this. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Call_of_Cthulhu">Background.</a> <a href="http://www.cthulhulives.org/cocmovie/index.html">Production details.</a>
<p>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XHuY2wXTd0o&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XHuY2wXTd0o&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p>
The Intertubes have long given homage to Cthulhu, and this is why. Shrill<a href="/glossary/term/61" title="A ritual term of abuse used of liberals by wingers when the winger lacks a substantive response to an argument. Synonym: &quot;Shut up!&quot; Sometimes used ironically by liberals.  Usage example, with irony: I used to like Paul Krugman when he wrote about economics, but lately he's been getting too shrill (from Atrios).   " class="glossary-icon"><img src="/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/61" title=" I used to like Paul Krugman when he wrote about economics, but lately he&#039;s been getting too shrill (from Atrios).   " class="glossary-icon"><img src="/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a>!     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
