<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>onealbear's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/onealbear"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/191/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/blog/191/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-01-30T16:29:15-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Sierra Leone “Blood Diamond” Thugs Guilty in International Court.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/sierra_leone_blood_diamond_thugs_guilty_in_international_court" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/sierra_leone_blood_diamond_thugs_guilty_in_international_court</id>
    <published>2007-06-20T17:19:33-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-06-20T19:17:50-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Department of Genocide, Torture, and Tyranny" />
    <category term="International Criminal Court" />
    <category term="Saddam Hussein" />
    <category term="Sierra Leone" />
    <category term="war crimes" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2107519,00.html">These guys</a> are despicable human beings. They deserve to be removed from society and imprisoned for life. And they have been. They won’t be hacking off any more arms and legs. They won’t be raping and sodomizing helpless women. And they won’t be recruiting children to fight their battles for them. But they will not be executed. For their crimes they will sit in steel cages for the rest of their lives, contemplating and (hopefully) regretting their savage brutality toward their fellow human beings.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2107519,00.html">These guys</a> are despicable human beings. They deserve to be removed from society and imprisoned for life. And they have been. They won’t be hacking off any more arms and legs. They won’t be raping and sodomizing helpless women. And they won’t be recruiting children to fight their battles for them. But they will not be executed. For their crimes they will sit in steel cages for the rest of their lives, contemplating and (hopefully) regretting their savage brutality toward their fellow human beings. </p>
<p>It seems obvious to me that Saddam Hussein should have been tried* before the same kind of international UN court. Instead, he was tried in what was described by many legal observers to be a kangaroo court, made up of his political enemies. Then he was turned over to his religious enemies for execution. This was one of many unfortunate miscues committed by the Bush Administration in the prosecution of their invasion and occupation of Iraq. But it was a big one. The martyrdom of Saddam Hussein has, no doubt, played a huge role in the alienation of hundreds of thousands of Sunni Iraqis who are now part of the “insurgency.” A majority of Iraqis, including some of Hussein’s enemies, have condemned the United States for this blunder. Sadly, we may never have a chance to win back their confidence.  </p>
<p><em>* NOTE: Since I, myself, condemn the policy of unilateral invasion of Iraq for the purpose of “regime change” as a criminal and immoral act of aggression in the first place, I do not subscribe to the theory that we (meaning the United Sates and our handful of co-invaders) had any right to capture and try Saddam Hussein (or cause him to be tried) in the first place. I acknowledge that Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, but we know a lot of bad guys (some of whom are our best friends in the region.) This post goes to the question of the appropriate venue for dealing with persons accused of crimes against humanity. Now exactly <strong>who</strong> should go before international tribunals for war crimes…that is another (perhaps, yet unanswered) question.</em></p>
<p>Cross Posted at <a href="http://www.onealcompton.com/"><strong><em>The Whole American Hog</em></strong></a></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Corelli’s Mandolin Redux.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/corelli_s_mandolin_redux" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/corelli_s_mandolin_redux</id>
    <published>2007-06-10T12:17:14-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-06-10T12:18:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Iraq Clusterfuck" />
    <category term="Department of War" />
    <category term="Allies" />
    <category term="Enemies" />
    <category term="Insurgents" />
    <category term="Iraq" />
    <category term="Terrorists" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Us against them, them against us, Shia against Sunni, Kurds against Turks, Baathists against Kurds, militia against police, security forces against insurgents, insurgents against terrorists. And our troops&#8230;</p>
<p>…caught in the middle of it all.</p>
<p>When I read <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19103676/">this frightening piece</a>, I was reminded of the climax of Louis de Bernières brilliant anti-war novel, (Captain) <strong><em>Corelli’s Mandolin</em></strong>, which portrays the tragic confusion and wholesale slaughter in the aftermath of the Italian-German occupation of Greece during World War 2.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Us against them, them against us, Shia against Sunni, Kurds against Turks, Baathists against Kurds, militia against police, security forces against insurgents, insurgents against terrorists. And our troops&#8230;</p>
<p>…caught in the middle of it all.</p>
<p>When I read <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19103676/">this frightening piece</a>, I was reminded of the climax of Louis de Bernières brilliant anti-war novel, (Captain) <strong><em>Corelli’s Mandolin</em></strong>, which portrays the tragic confusion and wholesale slaughter in the aftermath of the Italian-German occupation of Greece during World War 2.</p>
<p>During the occupation, the Greek resistance was, itself, divided into fiercely dogmatic ideological camps—Royalists, Communists, Socialists, Liberals, Monarchists, Anarchists, etc. They killed and tortured each other over sacks of potatoes and rice. In addition to these longstanding animosities between the Greeks themselves and the occupation by the Italians and Germans, there were external pressures from the Turks, the Bulgarians the Albanians and others. And of course, the British were in the middle of it too, protecting the interests of Empire.</p>
<p>After 1943, when the Allies invaded Sicily and the Mussolini government was overthrown, many Italian soldiers, including those in Greece, switched sides and took up arms against the Nazis. In response, Hitler ordered a wholesale massacre of the Italian Troops in Greece. The Nazis shot about 4000 Italian boys and burned the bodies. Four thousand survived and were being transported by ship to labor camps. But the ships were bombed by the British and most of the Italians drowned in the hulls. The rest were machine-gunned by the Germans as they tried to abandon ship.</p>
<p>The senseless and brutal carnage that followed in Greece for years was devastating. The Greek Communists, on orders from Tito, used the arms they had been supplied by the British to fight the Nazis to impose their will on most of the countryside. They perfected the “art of atrocity and oppression” which they had learned from watching the Nazis.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, and then again as tragedy.”</strong><br />
              Louis de Bernière <em>Corelli’s Mandolin</em></p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Cross posted at <a href="http://www.onealcompton.com/"><strong><em>The Whole American Hog</em></strong></a></p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senseless. Pointless. Futile. Needless. Immoral. Unnecessary. Meaningless. Stupid. Insane.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/senseless_pointless_futile_needless_immoral_unnecessary_meaningless_stupid_insane" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/senseless_pointless_futile_needless_immoral_unnecessary_meaningless_stupid_insane</id>
    <published>2007-05-23T17:13:06-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-23T17:13:06-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Iraq Clusterfuck" />
    <category term="Al Gore" />
    <category term="Democrats" />
    <category term="Fear of Soundbites" />
    <category term="Iraq" />
    <category term="Straight Talk" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Why can&#8217;t more Democrats call this occupation what it really is instead of letting the other side frame the debate? Time. After. Time. What are Blue Dogs and other Bush enablers so afraid of? That they will give the other side a soundbite that could (possibly) be used against them in a future campaign? That they will be portrayed as unsympathetic to the troops?</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Why can&#8217;t more Democrats call this occupation what it really is instead of letting the other side frame the debate? Time. After. Time. What are Blue Dogs and other Bush enablers so afraid of? That they will give the other side a soundbite that could (possibly) be used against them in a future campaign? That they will be portrayed as unsympathetic to the troops? </p>
<p>Even Al Gore can&#8217;t quite bring himself to speak the unvarnished truth about the war. There was a moment in the Diane Sawyer interview in which Gore had a chance to say that our soldiers are dying and being maimed in vain, for a war that should never have been fought. But Al couldn’t bring himself to say the words: “Yes they are dying in vain.” Instead, he took a more cautious tack, declaring that of course our soldiers should be honored for their sacrifices, etc.</p>
<p>I just want to know what’s wrong with asking a few simple straightforward questions and demanding straightforward answers to those questions?</p>
<p>For instance:</p>
<p>1. Why did we go into the war in the first place?</p>
<p>2. Why are we still there?</p>
<p>3. For what cause are our young men and women being asked to sacrifice their lives and limbs in Iraq?</p>
<p>And if there are no good answers to those questions, what is wrong with saying that their sacrifices are, in fact, in vain? Just asking.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, less than 24 hours after the Democrats caved to the 28 percenters on withdrawal deadlines, our troops are still sitting ducks and there is no end in sight.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sainthood for Elmer Gantry in Brazil.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/sainthood_for_elmer_gantry_in_brazil" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/sainthood_for_elmer_gantry_in_brazil</id>
    <published>2007-05-11T15:49:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-11T15:49:18-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Theocracy Rising" />
    <category term="Department of What is WRONG with These People?" />
    <category term="abortion" />
    <category term="Birth Control" />
    <category term="Brazil" />
    <category term="Catholics" />
    <category term="Pope" />
    <category term="The Vatican" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Pope Benedict XVI , the ancient relic poseur who is the chief apologist for the ancient medieval relic that is the Catholic Church is on a whirlwind tour of the Americas, which began here in Brazil with a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6645555.stm">canonization</a> of an 18th century snake-oil salesman and a rousing <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070509/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/pope_brazil">call to action</a> by the faithful on the most important issues of our time.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Pope Benedict XVI , the ancient relic poseur who is the chief apologist for the ancient medieval relic that is the Catholic Church is on a whirlwind tour of the Americas, which began here in Brazil with a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6645555.stm">canonization</a> of an 18th century snake-oil salesman and a rousing <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070509/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/pope_brazil">call to action</a> by the faithful on the most important issues of our time.</p>
<p>What, you might ask, are the most critical issues facing mankind today? War and Terrorism? No. Genocide? No. Destruction of the Environment and Global Warming? Nuclear Proliferation? Poverty? Disease? Hunger? Starvation? Overpopulation? Murderous military dictatorships? Corrupt regimes? Puppet governments? No. No. No. No. No and Double No. Not even close. This Pope knows better:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>During the Mass, the 80-year-old pontiff encouraged his listeners to follow the example of the new saint by helping the needy, in what he described as a world &#8220;so full of hedonism&#8221;. He also criticized those who ridiculed the sanctity of marriage and virginity before marriage. </em></p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Here are&#8212; in this Pope’s view and the view of the rest of the horny old patriarchal reprobates in the Vatican— the greatest evils facing humanity today:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Sex before marriage.<br />
2. Divorce.<br />
3. Birth control and especially the morning after pill (Have fun, pay the next day.)<br />
4. Drug Use (wine and Anisette excepted)</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Then, of course, there is the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070509/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/pope_brazil">really big thing</a>: <em><strong>the female uterus, and what’s in it or not in it</strong></em> which, according to the Pope, should forever and always remain a concern of the state and the criminal justice system. By the way:<br />
<em></p>
<blockquote><p>The World Health Organization estimates that illegal abortions numbered more than a million in Brazil last year alone.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></em> Coathangers forever. Yes!!</p>
<p>Now about that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6645555.stm">canonization</a>: </p>
<p>Friar Galvão was a faith healer. He fed the gullible faithful magical cure pills, which were actually little rolled up balls of paper and ink. He was credited by the church with over 5000 miraculous cures in his day, but the church only had the cajones to claim two modern day miracles as a direct result of ingestion of the magic spitballs:<em></p>
<blockquote><p>After canonising Friar Galvao, the Pope also hugged Sandra Grossi de Almeida and her seven-year-old son, Enzo. She is one of two Brazilian females who the Church says are evidence of divinely inspired miracles that justify Friar Galvão&#8217;s sainthood.<br />
Friar Galvão is remembered for producing Latin prayers written on tiny balls of paper that, when swallowed, had the apparent effect of curing a range of ailments. After taking one of these pills, Ms Almeida, who had a uterine malformation that should have made it impossible for her to carry a child for more than four months, gave birth to Enzo.<br />
Friar Galvao is also certified by the Church as healing a four-year-old girl said to have been considered incurable by doctors.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></em>Wait a minute. Certified by whom, exactly?<em></p>
<blockquote><p>Friar Galvao is also <strong>certified by the Church</strong> as healing a four-year-old girl said to have been considered incurable by doctors. </p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></em><br />
Oh yes I see. All scientific and shit. Hmmmm.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>We Have Seen the Enemy and it is US!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/we_have_seen_the_enemy_and_it_is_us" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/we_have_seen_the_enemy_and_it_is_us</id>
    <published>2007-05-02T21:30:34-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-02T21:33:07-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Iraq Clusterfuck" />
    <category term="George Bush" />
    <category term="Harry Reid" />
    <category term="Iraqi Public Opinion" />
    <category term="surge" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/19_03_07_iraqpollnew.pdf"><strong>poll</strong></a> conducted by D3 Systems for the BBC, ABC News, ARD German TV and USA Today, more than 2,000 people were questioned in more than 450 neighbourhoods and villages across all 18 provinces of Iraq between 25 February and 5 March 2007:<br />
<em><strong></p>
<blockquote><p>69% of Iraqis think that the occupation by the US and the UK is making things worse. </p>
<p>77% of Iraqis think that the US occupation is having a negative effect compared to 12% who think the occupation is having a positive effect. <strong>(That’s about 7 to 1 PURPLE THUMBS DOWN by my calculations.)</strong></p>
<p>A majority (51%) actually approves of attacks on coalition forces.
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></em>Wow. That is not insurgency talking. That is revolt against an armed occupying force.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/19_03_07_iraqpollnew.pdf"><strong>poll</strong></a> conducted by D3 Systems for the BBC, ABC News, ARD German TV and USA Today, more than 2,000 people were questioned in more than 450 neighbourhoods and villages across all 18 provinces of Iraq between 25 February and 5 March 2007:<br />
<em><strong></p>
<blockquote><p>69% of Iraqis think that the occupation by the US and the UK is making things worse. </p>
<p>77% of Iraqis think that the US occupation is having a negative effect compared to 12% who think the occupation is having a positive effect. <strong>(That’s about 7 to 1 PURPLE THUMBS DOWN by my calculations.)</strong></p>
<p>A majority (51%) actually approves of attacks on coalition forces.
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></em>Wow. That is not insurgency talking. That is revolt against an armed occupying force. </p>
<p><strong>Harry Reid is right and has been right.</strong> We can never win this war militarily, nor should we continue to try. What we should do is get the hell out of there as fast as we can and beg the Iraqis to forgive us for our trespasses (as the saying goes.)</p>
<p>But of course we are not doing that. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18440855"><strong>This</strong></a> is what we are doing:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>4,000 U.S. soldiers to Baghdad for crackdown.</strong></p>
<p>BAGHDAD - Nearly 4,000 American soldiers pour into Baghdad this week, the fourth of five brigades being sent to strengthen an 11-week-old crackdown aimed at quelling sectarian violence, the U.S. military said Wednesday.
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>So why do we have to bring in another 4000 American troops to secure Bagdad? Because <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9709438"><strong>everybody on all sides</strong></a> seems to be against the occupation, that’s why. You can call it <em>Operation Iraqi Freedom</em>, a <em>Surge for Democracy</em>. Whatever&#8212; It is still nothing short of brute martial law imposed on a civilian population in a country where we are not welcome. As our brave men and women are <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18393279/"><strong>learning every day</strong></a> as the Bush-McCain-Lieberman surge drags on, it is pretty difficult to gain control of a city in which most of the residents hate your guts. </p>
<p>So what exactly are we doing? Are we “clearing the area of insurgents?” What a terrible, sick joke. They are all insurgents—insurgents, revolutionaries, freedom-fighters, patriots&#8212;call them whatever you want to call them. But you can’t call them wrong to continue resisting our unlawful and murderous occupation of their country. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/27/iraqis-poll/"><strong>They don’t want us there</strong></a>!</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Debate Spin: Hillary&#039;s Attack Dog to the Rescue.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/debate_spin_hillarys_attack_dog_to_the_rescue" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/debate_spin_hillarys_attack_dog_to_the_rescue</id>
    <published>2007-04-30T17:56:01-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-30T18:21:22-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Double-Ply Journalism" />
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <category term="AIPAC" />
    <category term="Attck Dog" />
    <category term="Barrak Obama" />
    <category term="hillary clinton" />
    <category term="Susan Estrich" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>After reading <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,269112,00.html">this pandering rant</a> from Fox News Columnist and consummate Hillary worshipper, Susan “put-him-in-the-tank” Estrich, I think I am gonna be sick. This is shameless, journalistic quackery. This, from the same political hack who gave us the unforgettable tank moment in 1988 on the way to squandering a 17-point lead to Lee Atwater and George Bush Sr.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>After reading <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,269112,00.html">this pandering rant</a> from Fox News Columnist and consummate Hillary worshipper, Susan “put-him-in-the-tank” Estrich, I think I am gonna be sick. This is shameless, journalistic quackery. This, from the same political hack who gave us the unforgettable tank moment in 1988 on the way to squandering a 17-point lead to Lee Atwater and George Bush Sr.</p>
<p>Estrich has written a book, <em>“The Case for Hillary Clinton”</em> and now is acting as an attack-dog mouthpiece for the Clinton Campaign. Despite the post-debate polling among South Carolina Democrats that showed Obama winning the debate, Estrich thinks Obama made “the biggest mistake of the debate” by slighting Israel in his answer to a question about America’s best friends in the world.</p>
<p>Here’s Estrich’s take on the unforgivable Obama gaffe (emphasis mine):</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama waxed on about NATO and our European allies before looking east to Japan. I&#8217;m not a foreign policy expert, but I&#8217;ve been around debates for decades and it was clear that Obama didn&#8217;t get that this was the Israel question.</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t get that <strong>people like me</strong>, voters and donors, were waiting to hear the word &#8220;Israel&#8221; in a way that Japanese Americans were not. Japan doesn&#8217;t live under constant threats; Israel does. Japanese Americans don&#8217;t worry about Japan&#8217;s survival in the way Jewish Americans worry about Israel.
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nevermind that <strong>“people like me”</strong> are already deeply entrenched with Hillary.</p>
<p>Clinton, of course&#8212;as the Senator from New York has to be&#8212;is completely Pro-Israeli (hence her Iraq war vote for which she cannot apologize.) If I were in the Clinton camp, I think I would leave Obama alone on the Israeli-Palestinian Issue. If you want to examine the root causes of 9/11 and all the rest (including the Iraqi debackle and the potential Iranian debacle to come) it is all about Israel. Other than gasbag neocons and christianist evangelicals (who see Armageddon in the works)—I believe that the majority of Americans are growing weary of protecting and funding Israel and supplying them with terrible weapons that they use <a href="http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10811">whenever they feel like it</a>, especially since they seem unwilling or unable to agree to even modest reversals of their land-grabbing gains in the quest for a Palestinian-Israeli peace accord.</p>
<p>Here’s more chip-on-the-shoulder nonsense from Estrich:</p>
<blockquote><p>Even when prompted by Brian Williams, who followed up by pointing out that Obama had neglected to mention Israel, and reminded him of his comment that &#8220;no one had suffered more than the Palestinian people,&#8221; Obama still didn&#8217;t get it right.</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>If “getting it right” means bowing and scraping and kissing the Israeli ring, I think Barrack Obama showed great political courage here. Don’t think for one moment that he misread the question or failed to grasp the significance of it. Obama knew full well what it was about – this was an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee">AIPAC</a> litmus test question&#8212; and he simply refused to rise to the bait. Bully for him.</p>
<p>Then comes the really absurd part of her rant, in which Ms. Estrich attacks Senator Obama for saying that no one has suffered more than the Palestinians in the history of the whole sordid ordeal:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sure, he said that Israel is an important ally, but his clarification of his &#8220;poor Palestinians&#8221; comment only left him further in the hole. His point, he emphasized, was that no one had suffered more than the Palestinian people from the failures in Palestinian leadership. That’s not exactly how I see it, or how many Jewish Americans see it. The Palestinians may be suffering more in the sense that their standard of living is lower, but whose fault is that?</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Now there’s a darn good question.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;it is the Palestinians and not the Jews who have chosen these terrible leaders and remained loyal to them. Doesn&#8217;t that count for something?
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, <em><strong>pleeeeze excuuuuuseuse me</strong></em>! Remind me again who elected Netanyahu and Sharon after Rabin was assassinated by an (ahem) <a href="http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9511/rabin/amir/11-06/index.html">Israeli wingnut godbag</a>.</p>
<p>By the way: here, for the record, is a fair and balanced summary of the plight of the Palestinian People: </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1. Four decades of occupation.</p>
<p>2. Millions of refugees who are not allowed to return home and millions who cannot get passports to leave.</p>
<p>3. Over 100 unrecognized villages in Israel where Arab&#8217;s have been given Israeli citizenship and pay taxes but receive no services; no electricity, no water, no medical, no schools, no respect, no human rights.</p>
<p>4. 4,170 Palestinian Homes have been demolished without reason or compensation since 2000</p>
<p>5. A concrete wall/electrified fence that does not follow the Green Line and has been deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice and must come down, but continues to grab Palestinian land, water and divides families and prevents farmers from tending their land which terminates their rights to it.</p>
<p>6. 9,599 Palestinians prisoners are being held, many without charges and access to legal council, and many of these are woman and children.</p>
<p>7. 60+ new Jewish-only settlements have been built on confiscated Palestinian land between March 2001 and July 11, 2003.</p>
<p>8. The U.S. gives $15,139,178 per day to the Israeli government and military and has furnished billions in weapons of destruction.<br />
</strong></p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Just to be clear: I am neither anti-Israeli nor pro-Palestinian. I am simply pro-peace. I loved Rabin and I have many Israeli friends. I am heartsick over the never-ending cycle of violence in the middle East. Nothing about this post shoud be construed as anti-semitic. It is about policy. When I refer to &#8220;all about Israel&#8221; above, I am only saying that I believe that the failure to come to some just resolution of this issue gives the terrorists all they need to justify their existence.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why We Should All be Pistol Packin’ Mamas and Papas.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/why_we_should_all_be_pistol_packin_mamas_and_papas" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/why_we_should_all_be_pistol_packin_mamas_and_papas</id>
    <published>2007-04-28T11:01:41-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-28T11:01:41-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="ammo" />
    <category term="concelaed weapons" />
    <category term="crossfire" />
    <category term="Derbyshire" />
    <category term="guns" />
    <category term="lunatic fringe" />
    <category term="Malkin" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This is just terrible. Here you have a highly-trained Police Officer accidentally killed by <i>another</i> highly trained Police Officer. Wait just a minute. Excuuuuuse me. I want Michelle Malkin and Newt Gingrich and Bill O’Reilly and John Derbyshire to explain to me again about how great it would be if everybody on every college campus in America started packing concealed heat. Lunatic fringe, I’ll tell ya.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This is just terrible. Here you have a highly-trained Police Officer accidentally killed by <i>another</i> highly trained Police Officer. Wait just a minute. Excuuuuuse me. I want Michelle Malkin and Newt Gingrich and Bill O’Reilly and John Derbyshire to explain to me again about how great it would be if everybody on every college campus in America started packing concealed heat. Lunatic fringe, I’ll tell ya. </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>New York Trooper Believed Killed by Fellow Officer.<strong /></p>
<p>NEW YORK (CNN) &#8212; A New York state trooper who was thought to have been shot and killed by an escaped convict this week is now believed to have been killed by friendly fire, authorities announced Friday.</p>
<p>Trooper David C. Brinkerhoff is thought to have been fatally shot by a fellow trooper while trying to arrest Travis Trim, 23, during a shootout in Trim&#8217;s upstate Margaretville home Wednesday afternoon.</p>
<blockquote />
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;Tom&quot; McCain and &quot;Huck&quot; Graham: Greasing the Bob Jones Skids.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tom_mccain_and_huck_graham_greasing_the_bob_jones_skids" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/tom_mccain_and_huck_graham_greasing_the_bob_jones_skids</id>
    <published>2007-04-18T22:12:54-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-18T22:53:18-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Republican Playbook" />
    <category term="Bob Jones University" />
    <category term="Godbag" />
    <category term="John McCain" />
    <category term="Lindsey Graham" />
    <category term="south carolina" />
    <category term="Wingnut" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Tom Turnipseed, my good friend and future United States Senator from South Carolina, sent me an e-mail this morning about Senator Lindsey Graham, who has been twisting a lot of far-right evangelical arms in South Carolina for his &#8220;Surge&#8221; buddy, John McCain. The response among evangelicals has been, shall we say, less than enthusiastic. So McCain has broken out the old &#8220;consultant&#8221; (wink, wink) checkbook and is <a href="http://www.thestate.com/426/story/39028.html">flat-out trying to buy</a> the wingnut vote.</p>
<p>This is how the sham shakes out:</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Tom Turnipseed, my good friend and future United States Senator from South Carolina, sent me an e-mail this morning about Senator Lindsey Graham, who has been twisting a lot of far-right evangelical arms in South Carolina for his &#8220;Surge&#8221; buddy, John McCain. The response among evangelicals has been, shall we say, less than enthusiastic. So McCain has broken out the old &#8220;consultant&#8221; (wink, wink) checkbook and is <a href="http://www.thestate.com/426/story/39028.html">flat-out trying to buy</a> the wingnut vote.</p>
<p>This is how the sham shakes out: Huck’s ally, State Senator Mike Fair is the godbag-wingnut mouthpiece for Bob Jones University. The McCain Campaign has &#8220;retained&#8221; Senator Fair as a “get-out-the-vote consultant,&#8221; paying him $21,000 ($7000 a month) since January.  Fair&#8217;s godbag counterpart in the State House is Representative Gloria Haskins. McCain has &#8220;retained&#8221; her son, Bryan Haskins to the tune of $6500 over the last three months as a &#8220;youth campaign coordinator.&#8221; And they have paid Stan Spears Jr., son of Adjutant General Stan Spears, more than $5,000 as &#8220;veterans coordinator.&#8221; Hmmmmmm&#8230;and double hmmmmmmmm.</p>
<p>But it really doesn&#8217;t matter how much money they dole out in bribes (retainers?) to godbag-connected politicians and their relatives; Lindsey will not be able to deliver. <strong>Most evangelicals just won&#8217;t buy McCain</strong>. They don&#8217;t trust him as far as they can throw him on their core issues. They will go for Romney, Brownback, Huckabee, Thompson&#8212;I don&#8217;t know who&#8212;but it will be anybody but McCain.</p>
<p>The same is true on the Democratic side. State Senator Daryl Jackson, the Preacher/Consultant on the Clinton payroll ($10,000 a month) won’t fare any better. Hillary can pay him a retainer until the cows come home. The minority vote will be split all up and down the line&#8212; Obama, Edwards, Richardson, Biden and Dodd will all get respectable slices of that primary pie.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;Huckleberry&quot; Graham and &quot;Tom&quot; McCain&#039;s Iraq Adventures (With Apologies to Mark Twain.)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/huckleberry_graham_and_tom_mccains_iraq_adventures_with_apologies_to_mark_twain" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/huckleberry_graham_and_tom_mccains_iraq_adventures_with_apologies_to_mark_twain</id>
    <published>2007-04-04T19:56:48-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-04T20:18:48-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Iraq Clusterfuck" />
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <category term="Iraq Quagmire" />
    <category term="John McCain" />
    <category term="Lindsay Graham" />
    <category term="Media Hoax" />
    <category term="Photo-op" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This morning, I got an e-mail from my old friend, Tom Turnipseed, a veteran <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/turnipmimic.html">political activist</a> and former Democratic State Senator from South</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This morning, I got an e-mail from my old friend, Tom Turnipseed, a veteran <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/turnipmimic.html">political activist</a> and former Democratic State Senator from South Carolina. Tom wonders why <em>The State</em> Newspaper of Columbia (a Knight-Ridder property) has not covered the story about Graham and McCain’s <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/04/mccains-market-photo-op-ends-in-disaster/">transparent photo-op</a> in Iraq, which put hundreds of American Troops and Iraqi civilians in a very dangerous situation in order to carry off a complete media hoax and has now, apparently, become a complete <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21496572-2703,00.html">human disaster</a>.  Damn good question. For that matter, where are the others&#8212; <em>The (Greenville) News, The (Charleston) Post and Courier, The (Sumter) Item and The (Florence) Morning News</em>? And where the hell is Robert Ariail, The State’s award-winning editorial cartoonist, who usually skewers everything and everybody? Are you guys ever going to challenge Lindsay Graham on anything? Or will “Huck” get a free ride, like his predecessor, Strom Thurmond, who never met a newspaper publisher in South Carolina that he couldn’t charm or intimidate.</p>
<p>On a related topic, I have heard through the grapevine that Tom Turnipseed is thinking about challenging “Huckleberry” in 2008. I sure hope he does, not only because he is the kind of bur-under-the-saddle populist that will drive Lindsay crazy, but also because he is the kind of Democrat who can win this seat. Turnipseed has been <a href="http://www.zmag.org/turnpoor.htm">fighting in the trenches</a> for decades on social and consumer issues in South Carolina. He is a thoughtful <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0814-01.htm">peace advocate</a>. &#8220;Seed&#8221; has been a champion of working folks and civil rights and <a href="http://www.countercurrents.org/en-turnipseed230705.htm">environmental causes</a> for many years. He is a media celebrity in South Carolina and his writings on politics have been featured on the op-ed pages of the <em>New York Times</em> and <em>The Washington Post</em>. </p>
<p>Now, I realize that South Carolina seems, to the outside world, to be hopelessly RED. This is an unfortunate preconception, which should be put to rest. Senator Fritz Hollings was a Democrat. He consistently won easy victories over his Republican opponents until he retired in 2004. The last South Carolina Governor, Jim Hodges, was a Democrat. There are two very powerful Democratic Congressmen from South Carolina, Jim Clyburn and John Spratt, both of whom are part of the Democratic leadership in the House. South Carolina has a solid Democratic base of Blacks, Labor and Courthouse Democrats and huge number of Independents. While it is true that many of these folks have tended to vote Republican in Presidential elections since Reagan, they remain fiercely independent and often, decline to identify with either party when polled. I wish I had a silver dollar for every time I have heard the boast; “I vote the man, not the party.” South Carolina is ripe for the plucking for any well-funded Democrat.</p>
<p>Thomas F. Schaller argues in his book, <em>Whistling Past Dixie: How the Democrats can Win without the South</em>, that the Democratic party should just write off the South and concentrate on the rest of the country. I could not disagree more strongly. There is a paradigm shift going on all over the country right now. Nobody gave Jim Webb a prayer in Virginia until George Allen’s Macaca gaffe, but Webb had a good chance all along. Sure, Virginia is home to Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson (as South Carolina is home to Bob Jones.) So what? Virginia had a Black Governor (Douglas Wilder) and the last two Governors have also been Democrats (Warner and Kaine.) Webb proved all of the punditocracy dead wrong. I’m with Dr. Dean on this: Fight ‘em on every front.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hils vs. Rudy?? Who Cares? It’s Never Gonna Happen.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/hils_vs_rudy_who_cares_it_s_never_gonna_happen" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/hils_vs_rudy_who_cares_it_s_never_gonna_happen</id>
    <published>2007-03-29T18:09:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-03-29T18:49:32-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Department of Fat Chance!" />
    <category term="Bob Jones" />
    <category term="hillary clinton" />
    <category term="Meaningless Polls" />
    <category term="Rudy Guliani" />
    <category term="south carolina" />
    <category term="Time/CNN" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This Time/CNN poll does not surprise me one bit. It is nothing more than a popularity contest between a popular Republican and an unpopular Democrat. WTF<a href="/glossary/term/4081" title="WTF: What The Fuck. Philly-ism."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/4081" title=" What The Fuck. Philly-ism."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a>??</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This Time/CNN poll does not surprise me one bit. It is nothing more than a popularity contest between a popular Republican and an unpopular Democrat. WTF<a href="/glossary/term/4081" title="WTF: What The Fuck. Philly-ism."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/4081" title=" What The Fuck. Philly-ism."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a>??  Despite what the Bushbots and Viagra swillers will make of it, there is no good news here for Republicans. This has absolutely nothing to do with the real mood of the nation. In the end, it won’t make a dime&#8217;s worth of difference anyway, because Hillary is definitely not going to be the Democratic nominee and Rudy is probably not going to be the Republican nominee. Mark this down: As South Carolina goes, so go the nominations. After Hillary comes in third (or fourth) in Iowa and New Hampshire, Obama, Edwards and others (Richardson, Gore, Clark?) will finish her off in South Carolina. The Bob Jones crowd will run Guliani out of town on a rail (like the Rovians did to McCain in 2000.) So go ahead, MSM, keep on polling, pontificating, huffing, puffing and whatever else make you feel important. I would bet the farm (if I had one, which I don&#8217;t) that you won&#8217;t get it right.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strom&#039;s Ward 72: (Military) Business as Usual.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/stroms_ward_72_military_business_as_usual" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/stroms_ward_72_military_business_as_usual</id>
    <published>2007-03-19T20:13:13-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-03-19T20:27:37-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="In Sickness and In Health" />
    <category term="Shameless Congressional Perks" />
    <category term="Strom Thurmond" />
    <category term="veterans" />
    <category term="Walter Reed" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The United States Military is an elitist, patriarchal, hierarchical organization and had been since the time of George Washington. So why is everybody so shocked by this ward 72 business??</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The United States Military is an elitist, patriarchal, hierarchical organization and had been since the time of George Washington. So why is everybody so shocked by this ward 72 business?? This is old news. Officer&#8217;s Clubs serve fine, twenty-year-old Scotch in crystal glasses with embroidered linen napkins. In an NCO club or a soldier&#8217;s bar, you&#8217;re lucky if your beer is served cold.</p>
<p>As a disabled veteran from another era, I can assure you that nothing much has changed. Like my father before me, I was an enlisted man, so I had to live with the consequences of low-priority veterans&#8217; health care. I spent a couple of years in crowded, filthy, badly ventilated wards in the early 70&#8217;s at the Bethesda Naval Hospital and the Portsmouth Naval Hospital. I spent months in the Fort Jackson Army Hospital and later, when I had complications from my service-connected disability, I suffered through many weeks in understaffed, overflowing Veterans Administration Hospitals in Columbia and Charleston, South Carolina.</p>
<p>During most of this time, the esteemed Senior Senator from my state, Strom Thurmond was the Chairman (or the ranking minority member) of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. The conditions in VA Hospitals were horrible. Everybody knew this. It was no secret. In fact, there was sort of a standing (sick) joke about how dangerous these hospitals were. But interestingly, no matter how deplorable the conditions in VA hospitals got, the American Legion and the VFW fellows never held Thurmond accountable. These guys (including my father, bless his heart) would have followed Strom to hell and back as long as he stood for the preservation and purity of the White Race (cough, cough.)</p>
<p>I am not at all surprised by the existence of a Ward 72 at Walter Reed Hospital. Bethesda Naval Hospital probably has a super luxurious suite standing by for their congressional benefactors, too. Congress should de-fund this exorbitant outrage now! These Multi-Zillionaire Senators and Congressmen have plenty of private health insurance. Let them use it. Public funds should be used to care for Soldiers, Marines, Sailors and Airmen who have been wounded and maimed in the line of duty.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Sneak Preview of Bocotton Stormfield&#039;s New Book: Republic Grammar.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/a_sneak_preview_of_bocotton_stormfields_new_book_republic_grammar" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/a_sneak_preview_of_bocotton_stormfields_new_book_republic_grammar</id>
    <published>2007-01-30T16:28:30-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-01-30T16:29:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>onealbear</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <category term="Democrat Party" />
    <category term="democratic party" />
    <category term="Frank Luntz" />
    <category term="George W. Bush" />
    <category term="Illiteracy" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><strong>Chapter 1. Shrubsville</strong>   </p>
<blockquote><p>A pack of sleep dogs stretch and yawn lazily under a stand of tower Oak trees as the little commute train steams out of the Shrubsville station. Spring is here. The beauty Magnolias and Azaleas are just beginning to bloom. The passengers look out of the dirt windows as clouds of brick-red dust blow across the fresh-plow fields. Red Gibson, the engineer, peers out from under the bill of his stripe cap as the train moves slowly down the wind track in the direction of Shooterville. Red is a very tradition man. He remembers the glory days of the Republic Partyâ€”the Ronald Reagan days and the Contract-With-America days&#8212; when the Democrat Party knew its place in the scheme of things. â€œWeâ€™ve come a long ways from Doleton and Gingrichburg,â€ he says to his crust old brakeman. â€œImagine the gall of this new Democrat Majorityâ€”thinking they have the right to question the Decider on matters of nation security.â€</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><strong>Chapter 1. Shrubsville</strong>   </p>
<blockquote><p>A pack of sleep dogs stretch and yawn lazily under a stand of tower Oak trees as the little commute train steams out of the Shrubsville station. Spring is here. The beauty Magnolias and Azaleas are just beginning to bloom. The passengers look out of the dirt windows as clouds of brick-red dust blow across the fresh-plow fields. Red Gibson, the engineer, peers out from under the bill of his stripe cap as the train moves slowly down the wind track in the direction of Shooterville. Red is a very tradition man. He remembers the glory days of the Republic Partyâ€”the Ronald Reagan days and the Contract-With-America days&#8212; when the Democrat Party knew its place in the scheme of things. â€œWeâ€™ve come a long ways from Doleton and Gingrichburg,â€ he says to his crust old brakeman. â€œImagine the gall of this new Democrat Majorityâ€”thinking they have the right to question the Decider on matters of nation security.â€  </p>
<p><strong>Next Week, Chapter 2. Shooterville</strong></p>
<p>(Hereâ€™s a preview&#8230;)</p>
<blockquote><p>There are many passengers lined up to board the train at Shooterville, most seeking to escape the oppress heat that has come over the rust enclave, especially since the beginning of the ridicule Libby<a href="/glossary/term/119" title="Libby: Verb. 1. To lie for the purpose of convincing a large number of persons to adopt some policy that was bad for them. Usage example: &quot;The mole libbied the public on behalf of a foreign power.&quot; 2. To launch a vindictive smear. &quot;To retaliate for the critical review of the film, the director had the newspaper libbied.&quot; Suggested by Juan Cole."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/119" title=" &quot;The mole libbied the public on behalf of a foreign power.&quot; 2. To launch a vindictive smear. &quot;To retaliate for the critical review of the film, the director had the newspaper libbied.&quot; Suggested by Juan Cole."><img src="sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a> trial&#8230;
</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>(To be continued)</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
