<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Paul_Lukasiak's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/paul_lukasiak"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/blog/456/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/blog/456/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-02T01:02:04-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>VOTERS TURNED OFF, NOT TURNED OUT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/voters_turned_off_not_turned_out" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/voters_turned_off_not_turned_out</id>
    <published>2008-11-05T06:05:11-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-05T06:05:11-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Despite all the celebrations, an examination of the  data from key states tells us that voters tuned out this election, rather than turned out for it.</p>
<p>105 million voted in the presidential election in 2000<br />
121 million voted in 2004</p>
<p>so far, with 95% of precincts reporting, only 112 million voted (extrapolate that to 100% and its only 117 million.)</p>
<p>here is data from 3 key states</p>
<pre>
	2000	        2004	        2008	2008 % counted
PA	4,912,185	5,765,764	5,390,910	97.95%
OH	4,705,457	5,627,908	5,012,434	95%
FL	5,956,243	7,609,810	8,005,681	99%</pre><p>
here are the voter registration statistics for those states</p>
<pre>       VOTER REGISTRATION
	2000 	        2004     	2008
PA	7,781,997	8,366,663	8,758,031
OH	7,531,555	7,972,826	8,164,823
FL	8,880,396	10,476,437	11,247,634     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Role of New Home Builders in the Housing Bubble</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_role_of_new_home_builders_in_the_housing_bubble" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/the_role_of_new_home_builders_in_the_housing_bubble</id>
    <published>2008-10-24T09:32:39-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-24T09:37:29-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Economic Apocalypse" />
    <category term="economic crisis" />
    <category term="real estate bubble" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>While there are many factors that explained the “housing bubble”, one culprit is the “new home” industry itself, which stopped building “affordable” homes..</p>
<blockquote><p>·	Nationally, in the first quarter of 2005, 31,000 new homes priced under $125,000 were sold.  In the first quarter of 2006, that number had declined to 18,000 homes, and by fourth quarter 2007 that number was down to 8,000.</p>
<p>·	The number of new homes sold in the $125k-$249,999 range declined from 34,000 in first quarter 2005 to 26,000 in first quarter 2006, declining to only 14,000 by fourth quarter 2007.</p>
<p>·	And for the $150k-$199,999 range, sales fell from 66,000 in first quarter 2005 to 57,000 in first quarter 2006, before plummeting to 33,000 by fourth quarter 2007.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pro-America America and &quot;Real&quot; Virginia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/pro_america_america_and_real_virginia" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/pro_america_america_and_real_virginia</id>
    <published>2008-10-22T06:25:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-22T06:25:25-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Class Warfare" />
    <category term="gentrification" />
    <category term="Patriotism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The Villagers are all aflutter because the McCain campaign and its surrogates are are talking about stuff like "the pro-America" parts of the country, and "real" parts of the state.</p>
<p>But you know what?  Some areas of this country are a lot more patriotic than others.  In some parts of the country, its tough to find a flag displayed on the Fourth of July and Memorial Day.  In other places, flag display on "patriotic" holidays is the norm -- the places where you didn't wait until 9-11 to wear a flag pin.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Paulson&#039;s gift to Wall Street</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/paulsons_gift_to_wall_street" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/paulsons_gift_to_wall_street</id>
    <published>2008-10-14T08:02:45-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-10-14T08:02:45-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Economic Apocalypse" />
    <category term="Department of How Stupid Do They Think We Are?" />
    <category term="banking crisis" />
    <category term="Paulson plan" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>So, after figuring out that his original plan wasn't going to work, Hank Paulson has now decided to reward his Wall Street buddies with a "capital infusion" in nine big banks -- most of which are located in New York City, and all of which have large divisions or subsidiaries that act very much like "brokerage firms".  </p>
<p>Not only does this reward bad behavior by the people responsible for this crisis, the likely consequences of this move are pretty horrible.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama&#039;s biggest mistakes...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obamas_biggest_mistakes" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/obamas_biggest_mistakes</id>
    <published>2008-08-27T08:56:49-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-27T09:57:50-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In the wake of Hillary Clinton's speech last night, there is a lot of talk about how not nominating Clinton for VP is "Obama's biggest mistake".  That is simply not the case.  Obama should not have "needed" Clinton as VP in the first place, and the fact that he does is a symptom of his actual 'biggest mistakes."</p>
<p>Obama's biggest mistakes, in order, were:</p>
<p>1) Not participating in further debates, and ignoring states like West Virginia and Kentucky.  That wasn't just a missed opportunity to introduce himself to more voters, it was a signal to voters that they didn't matter to him.  It also provided evidence to those doubtful of Obama that he lacks the personal characteristics that a President needs to govern in the face of pressure and adversity.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NYT Renders Black Women Politicians Invisible</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/nyt_renders_black_women_politicians_invisible" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/nyt_renders_black_women_politicians_invisible</id>
    <published>2008-08-15T08:48:49-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-15T08:48:49-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Media Meltdown" />
    <category term="African American Politics" />
    <category term="New York Times" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The Sunday New York Times Magazine will have a big feature entitled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/magazine/10politics-t.html?pagewanted=all">Is Obama the End of Black Politics</a></p>
<p>Filled with reporter Matt Bai's Obamessiahanism, the piece is unreadable for all intents and purposes.  But it is notable for one big reason -- Bai renders black female politicians invisible in his discussion of black politics.</p>
<p>Of the 15 African Americans whose names get a "link" from the Times, there is only one woman -- Michelle Obama.  In addition to the "linked", there are other black political figures quoted or mentioned -- none of whom are women.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Faux, and Genuine, &quot;Feminist/Womanist Perspectives&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/on_faux_and_genuine_feminist_womanist_perspectives" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/on_faux_and_genuine_feminist_womanist_perspectives</id>
    <published>2008-07-23T13:06:30-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-23T21:31:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Department of How Stupid Do They Think We Are?" />
    <category term="2008 election" />
    <category term="clinton" />
    <category term="feminism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Two weeks ago, <a href="http://www.openleft.com/tag.do?tag=guestblogging">OpenLeft initiated an effort </a> to “diversify its front page” by publishing a series of posts which it described as being on the topic <I>feminist and womanist perspectives on Hillary Clinton's withdrawal from the race -- and why this matters to progressives.</I>  After an excellent start with a <a href="http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6808">post by Melissa McEwan</a>, the experiment has failed.  While OpenLeft maybe have “diversified” its front page by publishing the works of women (and African American women), it did so at the expense of the “feminist/womanist [FW] perspective.”  Rather than FW perspectives, readers were treated to what can be most charitably collectively described as “Obama-ists” perspectives from women who identify as feminists.  All three posts subsequent to McEwan’s were either dismissive of, or hostile to, anything that can be described as an “F/W perspective”.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Devil you don&#039;t know...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_devil_you_dont_know" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/the_devil_you_dont_know</id>
    <published>2008-06-13T20:07:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-13T20:07:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Since VL's thinking in offering his endorsement of Barack Obama is apparently premised on a cliche ('the lesser of two evils'), allow me to suggest that there is another, even more apt, cliche available...</p>
<p>Better the Devil you know, than the Devil you don't know.</p>
<p>Does this constitute an endorsement of McCain -- no.  McCain's record has been all over the place...he, like Hillary Clinton, has been running for President for the last eight years.  Clinton, of course, spent the last eight years with her eye on November, because Democrats are supposed to be smarter than Republicans.  McCain knew he had to go way right -- and "support the President" -- if he expected to win the GOP nomination.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Documentary Proof of RBC&#039;s &quot;Stop Hillary&quot; corruption</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/documentary_proof_of_rbcs_stop_hillary_corruption" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/documentary_proof_of_rbcs_stop_hillary_corruption</id>
    <published>2008-06-11T21:15:20-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-11T21:15:20-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="2008 Primaries" />
    <category term="Florida delegation" />
    <category term="Rules and Bylaws Committee" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The PROOF of RBC Fraud</p>
<p>A document included as an exhibit in the <a href="http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/Nelsonv.Dean.php">Nelson vs Dean Lawsuit</a> that was filed in October 2007 in an attempt to force the DNC to seat the Florida delegation provides indisputable proof that the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee singled out Florida and Michigan for sanctions, and ignored violations of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.</p>
<p>The document is a tentative list of state primaries and caucuses, and is dated September 13, 2007.  The listing for Florida says (“P” designates a primary)</p>
<blockquote><p>1/29/08  Florida  P  Date of state primary; date violates rules; Non-Complia </p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama&#039;s coalition of Religious hate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obamas_coalition_of_religious_hate" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/obamas_coalition_of_religious_hate</id>
    <published>2008-06-11T09:09:25-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-11T09:09:25-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Theocracy Rising" />
    <category term="abortion" />
    <category term="Christian Right" />
    <category term="gay rights" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Barack Obama is looking for support from some of the most intolerant and corrupt "Christian" right leaders.  </p>
<p>An article entitled <a href="http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/390184.aspx">Obama Meets with Conservative and Progressive Religious Leaders</a> at the Christian Broadcasting network, included a list of "religious leaders" that Obama is trying to get support from...</p>
<p>Most of these leaders are rabidly anti-gay and anti-choice.  And they even include one "religious leader" who played a role in Monica Goodlings efforts to put more right wing Christians in the DoJ....</p>
<p>Here's a partial list...</p>
<ul>TD Jakes – One of those mega-church preachers who enriches himself (he lives in a $1.7 million mansion) while “saving souls”</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lets count the men who say &quot;She did what she needed to do&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/lets_count_the_men_who_say_she_did_what_she_needed_to_do" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/lets_count_the_men_who_say_she_did_what_she_needed_to_do</id>
    <published>2008-06-07T20:42:15-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-07T20:42:46-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="alternative media" />
    <category term="hillary clinton" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>How many times can men say that Clinton needed to do what <i>they</i> wanted her to do?</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton didn't <i>need</i> to do anything -- she <i>chose</i> to get behind Barack Obama, which is what she was expected to do.  </p>
<p>18 million people cast their primary ballot for Hillary Clinton -- she didn't need to do anything to remain a potent force in the Democratic Party.  She could have, had she chosen to, told Barack Obama "it ain't over 'til its over, I'm still the better choice, I've still got more experience, I've still got better ideas, and I'm still far more electable than you -- and superdelegates have nearly three months to figure that out."</p>
<p>But we are now going to be told ...</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RBC Violations of DNC Charter &quot;Sunshine&quot; Provisions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/rbc_violations_of_dnc_charter_sunshine_provisions" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/rbc_violations_of_dnc_charter_sunshine_provisions</id>
    <published>2008-06-06T11:40:10-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-07T12:01:12-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="clinton" />
    <category term="DNC" />
    <category term="Florida" />
    <category term="michigan" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="RBC" />
    <category term="Rules and Bylaws Committee" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>The  “Magic Number” is still 2025, or 2209.  But its not 2118.</p>
<p>That’s because, in violation of the DNC charter, a secret meeting was held, and secret votes were taken -- violations of specific Charter “sunshine rules” provisions.  A deal was struck among Obama supporters on the committee to completely ignore what is known as the “fair reflection” rule (see note below), and to treat the constituency groups that had provided Hillary Clinton with considerable margins in two states (Hispanic/Latino voters, older voters, women, Jewish voters in Florida, older voters, working class voters, rural voters, and women in Michigan) as “half voters”.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Messages to Hillary....</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/messages_to_hillary" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/messages_to_hillary</id>
    <published>2008-06-03T22:36:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-03T22:36:00-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dems Who Don&#039;t Suck" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Hillary asked us to go to hillaryclinton.com and tell her what we thought we should do.  </p>
<p>This thread is intended for people who go there and tell her to come back here and paste their letters....</p>
<p>mine is below the break</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Action Alert: Call Alice Germond</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/action_alert_call_alice_germond" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/action_alert_call_alice_germond</id>
    <published>2008-06-02T19:03:14-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T19:03:14-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Alice Germond is Secretary of the DNC, and a member of the Rules and Bylaws Committee.</p>
<p>She considers herself the guardian of the rules.</p>
<p>Article 9, Section 12:  of the Charter of the Democratic National Committee states: All meetings of…official party committees…shall be open to the public and votes shall not be taken by secret ballot.”</p>
<p>On Saturday, a secret meeting was held, at which votes were taken.  </p>
<p>At the end of the morning session, a one hour lunch period was announced, and the afternoon session would commence after that lunch. Members of THE PUBLIC were told to return in one hour.</p>
<p>THE PUBLIC, which had a right, under the charter to attend the meeting, showed up.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An idea...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/an_idea" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/an_idea</id>
    <published>2008-06-02T01:02:04-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T01:02:04-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Paul_Lukasiak</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="DNC refund" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>I want to throw an idea out there.</p>
<p>I'm thinking of starting a campaign to demand refunds (and possibly sue) the DNC for its failure to abide by its own rules.  The easiest one to prove is the Sunshine rule.... TONS of others were violated, but they require explanations.  The Sunshine rule is simple -- all business is conducted in public.  No "smoke filled/back room deals".</p>
<p>Yesterday there were various news reports that deliberations were expected to last until midnight --- and that was before the morning part ran over a couple of hours.</p>
<p>An agenda was announced in the morning that did not occur that afternoon.   But a one hour lunch expanded to three hours...after which three resolutions were offered, each allowed only 10 minutes of discussion.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
