Warriors), more are not desirable. (Via TalkLeft)
]]>[I]t should be pointed out that a non-profit group focusing efforts on registering unmarried women in presidential primaries has to know that their activities will almost certainly help Hillary Clinton, as that is probably her strongest demographic.
Warriors), more are not desirable. (Via TalkLeft)
[I]t should be pointed out that a non-profit group focusing efforts on registering unmarried women in presidential primaries has to know that their activities will almost certainly help Hillary Clinton, as that is probably her strongest demographic.
Sign 2: Matt Drudge is an entirely fair and reliable source of infomation on Democratic Candidates as this reaction to Republicans assuming their opponent in the fall will be Obama shows.
Although it should be noted that the Unity Warriors are taking inspiration from the top on this one. That comment also leads us neatly into…
Sign 3: It’s entirely reasonable to allow Republicans to dictate the Democratic Agenda….unless they’re voting for Clinton, in which case it means they’re trying to give Democrats the weaker and/or evil candidate. This simple rule can easily be demonstrated by this reaction to the news that 62% of former Republican voters went for Obama.
That’s it? Only 62?
I think Repulicans are starting to like her more and more now that she’s decided to use their campaign tactics.
Here we see that 62% of Republicans vote for Obama because they think he’s an amazing unifier who will change the world and give us all rainbows and ponies, whilst the other 42% vote for Clinton because she’s the second coming of Hitler and they approve of such things.
These Unity Warriors should be assumed to be highly impervious to rational thought, if one is encountered do not attempt to engage in debate. If cornered remember that, like religious symbols repel vampires, anything that lacks purely symbolic meaning (such as issues of substance) will ward them off.
]]>