Oh, great. I don't know if many of you, readers, use Twitter, but I find it absolutely invaluable to track stories, both breaking and continuing, and far superior to Facebook, which is all crapped up with advertising, and is more about family pix and (to put it more kindly) personal relationships, and not news. Oh well:
If your Twitter stream is looking a little more crap random than usual there’s a concrete reason for that: Twitter has made a behind-the-scenes change which means it’s algorithmically adulterating the mix of content you see. Not that they’re putting it like that, of course.
The specific change in how your Twitter timeline operates allows for the company to inject additional content into your feed from other users you don’t follow. This is in addition to promoted tweet advertising content — you still get that thrust into your feed too.
The nice thing about Twitter is that I see what I have decided I want to see. (I know that's the Daily Me, but for, er, me, that means I'm tracking stories from curated stories and nothing else. Read below the fold...
Tony Blair gave Kazakhstan’s autocratic president advice on how to manage his image after the slaughter of unarmed civilians protesting against his regime.
In a letter to Nursultan Nazarbayev, obtained by The Telegraph, Mr Blair told the Kazakh president that the deaths of 14 protesters “tragic though they were, should not obscure the enormous progress” his country had made.
Mr Blair, who is paid millions of pounds a year to give advice to Mr Nazarbayev, goes on to suggest key passages to insert into a speech the president was giving at the University of Cambridge, to defend the action.
Mr Blair is paid through his private consultancy, Tony Blair Associates (TBA), which he set up after leaving Downing Street in 2007. TBA is understood to deploy a number of consultants in key ministries in Kazakhstan.
Human rights activists accuse Mr Blair of acting “disgracefully” in bolstering Mr Nazarbayev’s credibility on the world stage in return for millions of pounds.
Because markets. Read below the fold...
[Done!! Thank you!!!!! --lambert]
[Just one more... --lambert]
[Readers, many thanks! i just need one more contribution and then I will have paid off the server bill. On the one hand, this is great. And I have to say, on the other, if everybody who visited the site gave just one dollar per year, I would be rich beyond dreams of avarice, and could even pay writers. Just a thought. Ya know, being one of the few blogs standing after daily blogging for a decade has to be worth something! --lambert]
[Readers, thanks. Based on past performance, I'm going to need 10 contributions to get the server people off my back. I now have
2 3 6,9 but it's a still a slow Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday. Help! And thanks in advance! --lambert]
Readers, I thought I was going to have 'til the end of the month to pay my server bills, but that's not looking so good. (The end of the month because I'm finally digging myself out from the bills from last heating season, and heating season begins again in six weeks!) So, I'm looking at a few hundred, and not my usual tens of thousands, but right now the cupboard is totally bare! I don't even have enough to make a deal with them... Thank you! Read below the fold...
I was a model railroader as a kid, and when you have a model railroad, you want something for your trains to run to, and from, and through: So, structures. And companies manufacture plastic building kits, for which there are a few rules beyond gluing the walls together at 90-degree angles:
One rule is that when you glue the two walls together (at a ninety-degree angle) make sure all the detail lines up. So if you've got a cornice on Wall A, make sure it lines up, at the corner, with the cornice on Walll B.
A second rule: When you've built your building and you position it on the layout, make sure there's no unsightly gap between the building and baseboard (or, as we would call it in the real world, the "ground").
So here we have a real world building that violate both rules:
So, the US elites are going postal ("You know you want to"), which is, of course, exactly the reaction ISIS wanted. Since all of it seems like gaslighting to me (at least Bush had the common human decency to do his gaslighting with non-lethal tactics.) I'm going to continue with my program, which is doing research on the minimum wage. (I'm not saying this isn't an important issue, so yes, call your Congress critter. I'm just saying I don't want to be thrown off track.) I'm just going to do a short link dump, with a little commentary:
Islamic State can’t be beat without addressing Syrian side of border, top general says WaPo. "[A]pplication of all the tools of national power–diplomatic, economic, information, military."
U.S. General Says Raiding Syria Is Key to Halting ISIS Times "This is an organization that has an apocalyptic end-of-days strategic vision that will eventually have to be defeated."
Islamic Terrorists Must be Defeated, Chairman Says Defense Department News. As distinct, that is, from the "news" above.
Pentagon chief: ISIS 'beyond anything we have seen' CNN. "'Like Mr. Foley, several hundred innocent members of the Yazidi and Christian communities have been killed in the same manner,' Barzani said in a statement Thursday." Barzani (and to be fair, ISIS, know their audience).
Amid U.S. air strikes, Iraq struggles to build own air force Reuters. Ka-ching!
The months in jail, and the prospect of trying to fit back into a society that he had abandoned was troublesome to Knight.
“I don’t know your world,” he told Finkel shortly before he was released from jail in November. “Only my world, and memories of the world before I went into the woods. What life is today? What is proper? I have to figure out how to live.” ....
“Sitting here in jail, I don’t like what I see in the society I’m about to enter,” Knight told Finkel. “I don’t think I’m going to fit in. It’s too loud. Too colorful. The lack of aesthetics. The crudeness. The inanities. The trivia.”
And eventually, Knight — who said he was never ill during the 27 years spent in the woods — shared his secret for survival in the Maine woods.
“Get enough sleep,” he told Finkel.
He's not the only one.... Read below the fold...
So, how many lives did former Big Tobacco shill Malcolm Gladwell ruin with his bogus "10,000 hours" talking point?
The 10,000 hour rule—first proposed by a Swedish psychologist and later made famous in Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers—states that exceptional expertise requires at least 10,000 hours of practice. The best of the best (the Beatles, Bill Gates) all amassed more than 10,000 hours of practice before rising to the top, Gladwell argued. So greatness is within virtually any person's grasp, so long as they can put in the time to master their skill of choice.
A new meta-analysis, however, indicates that the 10,000 hour rule simply does not exist. As Brain's Idea reports, authors of the new study undertook the largest literature survey on this subject to date, compiling the results of 88 scientific articles representing data from some 11,000 research participants. Practice, they found, on average explains just 12 percent of skill mastery and subsequent success. "In other words the 10,000-Hour rule is nonsense," Brain's Idea writes. "Stop believing in it. Sure, practice is important. But other factors (age? intelligence? talent?) appear to play a bigger role."
While this is the largest study to date to arrive at this conclusion, it's not the first.
So who exactly did Gladwell hurt? Read below the fold...
At TPM, of all places! A fine interview:
Let's talk about the study. If you had 30 seconds to sum up the main conclusion of your study for the average person, how would you do so?
I'd say that contrary to what decades of political science research might lead you to believe, ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does in the United States. And economic elites and interest groups, especially those representing business, have a substantial degree of influence. Government policy-making over the last few decades reflects the preferences of those groups -- of economic elites and of organized interests.
Shocker, I know, but it's nice to hear a scholar come to that conclusion backed by hard data (you know, data other than my whole life). Read below the fold...