And high time, too.
The Republican Partei of Texas asks:
Why would anyone want to make a picture of our president from pornographic material?”
Why, indeed. One question:
What do you mean, “our”?
Then again, I don’t see what they’re upset about. It’s not like the artist pictured Bush taking a “wide stance.” Or used, say, used pictures of dead children from Iraq or tortured prisoners.
Come on! Where’s your sense of humor?
NOTE Of course, as always it’s all in the details…
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Front page
NSFW is one thing...
… but you should warn us acilantrists about links to Coriander Press works.
Damn ... shame to
turn those images into something so obscene.
Thank goodness not all pr0n stars...
… have submitted to anal bleaching. It would have made a faithful rendering of Bush’s smirk downright impossible.
“A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” - Margaret Mead
Ouch!
Oh, man. First “frenum ladders.” Now this.
Maybe somebody should ask Fred Thompson if his neck wattles have been bleached?
We. Are. Going. To. Die. We must restore hope in the world. We must bring forth a new way of living that can sustain the world. Or else it is not just us who will die but everyone. What have we got to lose? Go forth and Fight!—Xan
Multi-colored a-hole Bush Billboard
From an ancient post at the Old Corrente Building.