From today’s Presidential Radio Address:
Where do we start?
So our Dear Ruler has vetoed H.R. 2082, the “Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008”.
The basic why is in his statement above. But he specifically objects to:
SEC. 327. LIMITATION ON INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES.(a) LIMITATION.—No individual in the custody or under the effective control of an element of the intelligence community or instrumentality thereof, regardless of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to any treatment or technique of interrogation not authorized by the United States Army Field Manual on Human Intelligence Collector Operations.
(b) INSTRUMENTALITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘instrumentality’’, with respect to an element of the intelligence community, means a contractor or subcontractor at any tier of the element of the intelligence community.
Oh, the horror! - We can’t waterboard anymore!
But even more worrisome to Bush just might be this section:
SEC. 326. REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE DETAINEE TREATMENT ACT OF 2005 AND RELATED PROVISIONS OF THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006.(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a comprehensive report on all measures taken by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and by each element, if any, of the intelligence community with relevant responsibilities to comply with the provisions of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (title X of division A of Public Law 109–148; 119 Stat. 2739) and related provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–366; 120 Stat. 2600).
(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1) A description of the detention or interrogation methods, if any, that have been determined to comply with section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (119 Stat. 2739; 42 U.S.C. 2000dd) and section 6 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (120 Stat. 2632; 18 U.S.C. 2441 note) (including the amendments made by such section 6), and, with respect to each such method—(A) an identification of the official making such determination; and(2) A description of the detention or interrogation methods, if any, whose use has been discontinued pursuant to the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 or the Military Commission Act of 2006, and, with respect to each such method—
(B) a statement of the basis for such determination.(A) an identification of the official making the determination to discontinue such method; and(3) A description of any actions that have been taken to implement section 1004 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (119 Stat. 2740; 42 U.S.C. 2000dd–1), and, with respect to each such action—
(B) a statement of the basis for such determination.(A) an identification of the official taking such action; and(4) Any other matters that the Director considers necessary to fully and currently inform the congressional intelligence committees about the implementation of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 and related provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
(B) a statement of the basis for such action.
(5) An appendix containing—(A) all guidelines for the application of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 and related provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 to the detention or interrogation activities, if any, of any element of the intelligence community; and
(B) the legal justifications of any office of the Department of Justiceabout the meaning or application of the H. R. 2082—26 Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 or related provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 with respect to the detention or interrogation activities, if any, of any element of the intelligence community.
And please don’t forget who voted against this legislation before it was vetoed:
None other than Republican presidential candidate, Senator John McCain.
So much for being tough on torture.











Front page
Why is George Bush Protecting al Qaeda Terrorists?
From Mike Isikoff and Mark Hosenball in Newsweek:
Harkat’s lawyer was more forthcoming:
So there you have it. The same George Bush government that identified these two men as dangerous terrorists also undermined the case against them by using torture to obtain information with which to charge them. The remaining evidence is not sufficient for a conviction, and may not be enough to even get them deported.
Could it really be true that the Bush administration is secretly trying to keep al Qaeda in business, supporting America’s enemies in order to prolong and expand war in the Middle East and tyranny at home? No, that can’t be so; if that were the case, Bush would have just let Osama bin Laden and his forces escape when they were surrounded in Tora Bora…oh, wait….
h/t:CathyfromCanada & dave at GallopingBeaver, my intertubular windows into the frozen North.