When Senator Larry Craig announced his innocence ("I do believe in ghosts, I do believe in ghosts...not gay, not gay...") after having pled guilty while under oath, did he understand that he was admitting he had committed perjury? Did he understand that is what he was saying? Back in those heady June days in Minnesota, he pled guilty while under oath in front of a judge--the oath being that he was to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth--that old, hoary oath thing. Poor guy, probably doesn't understand english or had eaten some twinkies or a large black man frightened him or...
Will Senator Larry Craig, a Republican from Idaho, issue a clarifying statement that will refute his denial of his admission? Lay down the ass gaskets: its going to be a bumpy crapfest.
Link from Crooks & Liars. ++++
- MJS's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
Hey, maybe Reid could call the Senate back into session...
... to deal with the extremely urgent Craig matter
And get a jump on that FISA Clusterfuck
and the new AG as well...
UPDATE Excellent Toles cartoon on the elephant in the stall.
We. Are. Going. To. Die. We must restore hope in the world. We must bring forth a new way of living that can sustain the world. Or else it is not just us who will die but everyone. What have we got to lose? Go forth and Fight!—Xan
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
The Craig "matter"
is one you just let fester when it belongs to the other side. No hurry to get resolution, take the high road, give him plenty of opportunity to explain himself because that's going so well, and let the news cycle drag on and on and on.
Toles, brilliant, thanks would have missed it.