Pass me another slice of that honeymoon cake, wouldja, hon? 'Cause somehow, I don't think we're the ones that got the blood on it. Joe Galloway -- who worked his sources for a lot of Knight-Ridder's excellent and accurate Iraq coverage, back in the day -- lets loose:
With two months still to go before his inauguration as the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama and his transition team are already getting off on the wrong foot, signaling that they have no intention of investigating anyone in the Bush administration for possible war crimes.
What we're talking about here is the torture of detained terrorist suspects in American custody in a grotesque violation of both our treaty obligations under the Geneva Conventions and our historic principles as a democratic nation.
By their own machinations and attempts to redefine and pervert both treaties and our own laws, President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Attorneys General John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, Cheney's chief of staff David Addington and any number of lesser suspects sought to shield themselves from, or put themselves above, justice. ...
Water boarding has always been treated as a criminal act in this country. Military officers were court-martialed at the turn of the last century for water boarding Filipino guerrillas. More recently, an East Texas sheriff was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison for water boarding a suspect and extracting a confession from him.
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue, and its no way to begin an administration that was elected on promises of change. What it says is that if you're one of the elite and powerful, your violations of the law will be overlooked, no matter how much damage you did to our country’s standing in the world.
And I thought of Sarah when I read this:
Out in West Texas, crusty old ranchers plagued by coyotes killing their calves and baby sheep shoot the offending beasts and hang their carcasses on the nearest barbed wire fence as an object lesson to the rest of the pack.
Unless the newly empowered Democrats in the White House and on Capitol Hill hang a few coyotes on some fences in Washington, D.C., they're making a huge mistake that will come back to haunt them, and all the rest of us, too.
Unless the truth, the whole truth, is unearthed, justice is done and the Republican closet is emptied of festering transgressions, the next pack will do it again, secure in the knowledge that their positions will protect them from the penalties that more ordinary citizens must pay for the same crimes.
The people of this nation have spoken loudly. They voted to throw the rascals out. They voted for a different way of governing, a different way of law making. They voted for equal rights under the law.
If their desires aren't satisfied — if the new broom sweeps no cleaner than the old one — the next time around they may move things up a notch and throw all the bastards out — and they'd be fully justified in doing so.
You know, back in the day I wrote a lot of posts on torture, but I did it because torture is evil, not to elect Democrats. (I guess that makes me purist.) And I fondly imagined that the Democrats would right that wrong, once they were in office. (Sure, the 2006 Congress is what it is, but torture happened in the executive branch, so when the good guys finally get in...)
Boy, was I wrong.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments




Front page


Comments
"America has spoken"
and it seems like the Village
has heard us say "torture is here to stay!" now, i'm pretty sure that isn't what i voted for, but then again, what do i know? i need solid, thoughtful Villagers to tell me what i really meant, after all.
...anyway, get ready to write a lot of the same posts you wrote over the last eight years, but with a slight change in the use of the letter "D" and a different name after the word "preznit." i knew, as you did, that it would be very unlikely that a Dem admin would want to give up the powers of the Unitary Executive, and the first step in demonstrating that is promising to let the previous generation of anticonstitutional criminals go free.
Will They Get Out of the Way of Others on Torture
that's the other question. If the Obama administration isn't going to prosecute criminals, they could at least stop the Bush Administration's practice of throwing up roadblocks to civil suits and the discovery in those suits. That discovery could eventually lead to enough information for there to be a groundswell of public demand for prosecutions, but even if that doesn't happen, it would be a public record of what was done.
I don't really expect Obama to get out of the way because he will want his successor to cover up for him. Now I don't expect him to do nearly as many awful things as Bush/Cheney did, but that won't matter. This is what Presidents do for one another - it's corrupt and wrong, but it's what they do.
As I've said, I expect we'll get a signal pretty quickly on what the Obama Administration is going to do because of all those reported civil servants anxious to talk to the press on Jan. 20 about torture and spying. If the new administration moves to punish the whistleblowers for "leaking" or "disclosing classified information" then that's your answer on all of it, IMO.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
I wish...
I had said that. Way to go, Mr. Galloway.
Not so much on the fences these days
it's cheaper to put adopted BLM donkeys in the pastures to defend the sheep.
I am glad, though, that the 1040 traps are all but gone.
We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0
1 John 4:18
In one of her early Town Halls,
along with a timetable for bringing the troops home, Senator Clinton specifically mentioned bringing to justice those in the Bush administration who broke the law. And she does keep her word.
So, yeah, that wrong would have been righted. If a Democrat had got elected.
I'm not certain I trust any elected official to keep their
word. How many times have we seen promises made, to be undone as soon as the last vote is counted. I wish this didn't sound so trite and weak but unless power and/or money is involved, our world will not improve.
I'd love to believe that Senator Clinton would bring justice to members of the Bush administration, but, it wouldn't happen unless it would facilitate her agenda. Fortunately, I believe Senator Clinton's agenda is to make her brand stronger.
I love this job!