It turns out that if we feed our bodies with the diet we evolved to accommodate, we are healthier and live longer.
I’m not a big believer in much of the touch-feely, do-it-yourself health care theories, and certainly not the herbal remedies that Americans spend a fortune on each year. I don’t see any real virtue to exercise beyond moderate walking and light lifting, and certainly there is no evidence that exercise either improves health or extends life; people with heart disease tend to not exercise while those with good cardiac function are able, and that explains all the differences seen in exercise-related studies. As well, the extreme caloric reduction diets like the Ornish regimen are in my view overrated, and strict vegetarianism does not reflect the reality of our hereditary physiological needs.
On the other hand, the average modern diet is disastrous for us both from the standpoint of becoming overweight and hypertensive. Smoking aside, those are the two things that will kill you early. High fat, simple carbohydrates, excessive salt and low fiber combine in ways we don’t fully understand to harden arteries and increase fat stores. Both of those things increase the risk of stroke and heart attack, and both of them are rampant in modern society. Many millions of dollars are spent annually on expensive drugs to counteract our dietary indiscretion, and many lives are lost or compromised in spite of all the medication.
A major new study, just reported in the Annals of Medicine, shows without question that a simple dietary strategy with an emphasis on vegetables, fruits, and complex carbohydrates can dramatically reduce the risk of both stroke and heart attack. Drawing on the data collected from 88,517 women over 24 years in the Nurses’ Health Study, researchers stratified the women’s diets according to how closely they came to the guidelines provided by the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. None of the women were required to change their diet, just to record their daily intake, so it was not randomized prospective or blinded, but there is no reason to believe that pre-existing disease influenced their dietary choices.
Following the DASH diet has been shown to reduce blood pressure in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals, especially when salt intake is also moderated, and also to lower LDL cholesterol concentrations. What wasn’t known for certain was the effect of these reductions on substantive health issues.
What this new study found is that the DASH diet reduces the incidence of strokes and heart attack. The difference between the quintile that most closely followed the DASH guidelines and the quintile that was closest to the typical American diet was both large and highly significant. Risk of heart attack was reduced by 24% (p < 0.001), and risk of stroke was lowered by 18% (p = 0.002). As well, there were large reductions in C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6, blood chemicals associated with generalized inflammation and a higher risk for many diseases.
Full text of the new study is here. These results were considered so important to public health that the editors of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine suspended normal practice and have made the entire report available free of charge. The other dietary studies cited above have also been made available for free in their entirety; these decisions by the Archives, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition are to be commended.
The DASH guidelines are here; the only caveat I would offer to these recommendations is with the use of margarine, of which I am not a fan. My view, the polyunsaturated fat in margarine has a health risk that is at least equivalent to that of butter, and the increased flavor of butter lets me be satisfied in my cooking with less. I also allow myself beef a couple of times a month, lean cuts like tri-tip and top sirloin, because otherwise I’d pine for it and what’s the point of that? Life should be lived, not endured.
Man ist, was man isst.









Front page
Thanks for sharing this
I always forget about the great information available from the federal government. And the info about DASH IS great.
I printed off the pdf from your link and I’ll be reading it later today (after I finish my taxes!)
Thanks again.
I wouldn't say we evolved to eat dairy
Considering that most of the adult population in the world is lactose intolerant.
I mean, cheese is wonderful stuff, but not everyone can eat dairy. I’ve had to cut it out myself due to GI issues. I’ve actually been trying to follow a mostly-vegan-with-occasional-fish diet, and when I stick to that, I feel noticeably better. I’m also forced to be more creative with my cooking and with my restaurant going.
Lacose tolerance is a recently evolved trait
Zuzu, thanks for reading and commenting. Good for you, sticking to a diet that suits your physiology.
Lactose intolerance is the consequence of an absence in the gut of the enzyme lactase. Until very recently in human history the genetic expression of lactase, directed by a gene on Chromosome 2, was universally active in early childhood but later switched off. The decline in lactase, beginning in some people at age 2 and completed in the majority of people by age 20, was of no evolutionary disadvantage and allowed cellular energy to be directed elsewhere.
Emergence of pastoral societies, however, provided a steady availability of fresh milk in addition to the animal’s meat. In certain populations, this new nutritional source extended an evolutionary reproductive advantage for the small segment of the population that naturally retained lactase production throughout life.
This evolutionary event has occurred independently in European societies, where sustained lactase expression is now most common, and also in African pastoralists through a different set of chromosomal mutations.
Prior to the pastoral availability of fresh milk, there was no evolutionary advantage to continued lactase production; with the added nutritional benefit, those with the genetic coding for lifetime lactase production improved their chances for survival and reproduction, passing on the trait. Lactose tolerance is a dramatic, important demonstration of evolutionary natural selection in humans, occurring not eons ago but within the span or recorded history.
In many regions lactose intolerance remains very high, but dairy is still consumed after fermentation in cheese, yoghurt and kefir during which lactose is broken down. Similarly, most people can consume dairy products in baked or boiled foods. I did make the opening statement specific regarding the value of consuming food for which we have evolved. If your personal evolutionary history does not include extended lactase production, then your lineage did not select for the consumption of dairy and for you it is not part of a healthy diet.
Without dairy, however, it is crucial to find an alternative source for calcium, especially for young females. Building a robust bone stock while young is the surest way to temper the effects of osteoporosis in old age. A safe, inexpensive and widely available source of dietary calcium is TUMS.
"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
It sounds like the studies line up with what Michael Pollan says in his latest book.
Eating “mostly plants” is a lot easier when they taste good. I just started to eat more vegetables, and Mark Bittman’s new cookbook helps me do that.
katiebird, you're quite welcome
Not all government is bad. If we could clear out the criminals, we would find ourselves with a pretty wonderful system that just needs a little redirection and some light housekeeping to provide us with amazing collective benefits.
Good luck with the taxes, enjoy the read.