
Apparently, yes. Pruning shears:
Last week a remarkable truth emerged - we need to have a torture debate. On Friday the President admitted that we are now a state sponsor of torture and an amazing thing happened: Nothing. TV news coverage was dominated by the Democratic primary, and if news outlets acknowledged it at all it was in a summary or somewhere in the back pages. I am on record with my deep revulsion for torture, but a critical mass of our upper political and media levels does not consider it worthy of sustained focus. Maybe if we change the terms of the debate we can make it more visible.
If we could get the pro-torture side to engage any of this we could begin having a real debate and public awareness would be raised. At the moment those of us who believe a civilized nation does not torture under any circumstances are largely talking amongst ourselves. We have failed to get our message across to a wider audience. Waiting for its self-evident hideousness to drive the discussion doesn’t appear to be working. Approaching it from some slightly different angles might change that, and it is something we should at least consider.
Well said.
Maybe a truth and reconciliation commission?
NOE Oh good. Now we're using waterboarding as motivational device. Makes Glengarry Glenn Ross look like Dante's Paradiso....
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
Nothing Will Be Done On Torture
Until January 20, 2009. It is not going to be a campaign issue because McCain says all the right things and the press only cares about what he says, not what he does.
No, unless a Democrat is elected president, there will be nothing done on torture. Even then, I'm not expecting any prosecutions or anything. The most I expect will happen is that we will learn more about what's been done and the torture itself will stop (and in the middle of the night, I worry about the latter even happening).
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
yup--nothing at all--or on spying or our rights
--even if we're in the WH.
Gonzales, Goodling & Sampson
There was a reason Gonzales was made AG and that was, simply, to try to ensure that no one in the Bush Administration ever faced criminal prosecution. How do you do that? You push out career people and hire political hacks in their place. Same thing with U.S. Attorney's Offices, many of which were allowed to decline massively in staffing and then once the old USAO was pushed out, the new hacktacular USAO would do the hiring.
This is the reason, btw, that I supported Clinton even when Edwards was in the race. I liked many of Edwards' positions and preferred his policies on many issues. However, the government is broken. It's that simple. The career staff has been degraded and compromised. And a hostile career staff can make an incoming president's life hell, especially if he doesn't know how the government works.
It doesn't matter what you want to do if you can't do it because you're being knee-capped by Monica Goodling-approved hires at every department and agency. You have to know how it's supposed to work so you can call bullshit when it doesn't work. Clinton has always seemed to me the only one who would know when to call bullshit going in.
On torture and all of the other pressing issues, half the battle is going to be figuring out who can be trusted. I love government service and many of the smartest people I've ever worked with have been government employees. Most of whom take pride in their ability to work for any Administration, no matter their personal poltics. But the civil service has been compromised like never before. However big a mess you think it is, it's worse.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
I wish you'd write more on the civil service, BDB
I'm sure you can do that without compromise...
That would be really original, insightful stuff. We can all rail on Obama -- that's like clubbing a baby seal now, it's so easy. Much as I appreciate your fine work in that regard....
[x] Any (D) in the general. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Funny You Should Mention That, lambert
I've been thinking about putting something together. There are a lot of source materials out there on the various departments and agencies with information on the damage done. I'm sort of out of the inner circle now, but I still have a lot of contacts at various departments and I spent a number of years workiing directly for political appointees so I think I have a feel for how it's supposed to work and what has happened to it. I read almost everything I can, but now it's a matter of going back and finding it. And that's a matter of having the time (whereas beating up on Obama is something I can do quickly and easily, heh).
How the government actually works is something I've found to be little understood by most people. I remember when I joined I was amazed at the inter- and intra-agency conflict (I learned the joke every federal employee knows, "I bet you thought there was only one United States government, right?"). So if I can find the time I'll put together some posts on how the government actually works or is suppsed to work (hint - imperfectly and inefficiently) and how it's been damaged.
It is something I feel strongly about. The Republicans have worked since at least Reagan to undermine the image of federal workers. There's a direct line, IMO, between that effort and the current clusterfuck. Speaking for myself, I don't work in the government because I can't work some place else, I had a very lucrative job at a big city law firm, thank you very much. I work in the government because I feel like my work is worth something, that it's worthwhile to try to make the country a little better, even if it's just my little corner of it. It's not more lucrative than private practice, but it is more satisfying. As uncynical as it sounds. Heavens, maybe I'm an Obama supporter afterall!
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
Give us that analysis, BDB....
... and we can do the riffing. Only you can write what you described. So do what only you can do!
[x] Any (D) in the general. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Republicans don't want to govern
"The Republicans have worked since at least Reagan to undermine the image of federal workers. There’s a direct line, IMO, between that effort and the current clusterfuck."
Government that works is bad for Republicans. They would have nothing to run on. (That is what American governance is all about really. One party saying government is broken, and the other saying agreeing, but ignore the fact the we broke it. In this incarnation of America's history, it is Republicans being the breaker.)
Bill Clinton for First Dude!!!
He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond
BDB--Boston Globe had great stuff on that--Savage
was the author of most of them--do a search--on DOJ, Civil Rights Division, Rove using Fed agencies for election help, and more...