Doesn't Treasury Know that Paying Bubble Prices for Bad Assets Is, Like, So 2008?

You know, I'm beginning to lose track of how many different ways Versailles is screwing us. The latest is another round of the government conspiring with Wall Street to try to hide the size of the big shitpile by paying more for assets than they are worth.

Via Yves Smith:

From Andy Lees at UBS (hat tip reader Scott, boldface his):

The U.S. will give further details of the Geither public/private partnership plan to take bad assets off banks books, later this week a senior department official has said. The official said that the Treasury wants to put out enough information in the coming week so that the potential participants can better judge the proposal. It will also detail the timeframe in which it will become operational. So far the plan is expected to leverage both public and private capital to buy assets using government financing. The initial funding would be from what remains of the USD700bn financial rescue fund, but a “placeholder” provision in President Obama’s fiscal 2010 budget plan signals a possible request of around USD750bn in new funds. Neel Kashkari, the Treasury’s interim administrator for the USD700bn rescue fund told law makers last week that private investors are ready to invest in distressed mortgage assets if they can get financing. With no private financing available, they could only pay prices that are too low for banks to be willing to pay. The bad asset plan is expected to be structured along similar lines to the TALF, which is scheduled to launch this week, although the TALF will be restricted to funds investing in highly rated asset-backed securities.

Lees said by e-mail that:reports suggested that the deal would have two subsidies: first to the investors to let the pay more for the assets that their current market prices, second, further capital contributions to the banks to allow them to take a haircut on their marks. That would allow for a deal to be done at prices somewhere between the banks' inflated marks and the current market prices.

As Yves points out, this is "billions to avoid price discovery, which is what it needed to assess the magnitude of the problem, attract private capital, and do triage on sick financial firms. This is simply a Japan solution with a lot of moving parts to disguise the essence of the undertaking."

Hmmm, now why do you suppose the government would want to disguise the essence of the undertaking?

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The AIG bonuses are a rounding error...

... compared to the bailout.

And where does Obama focus his attention? You guessed it...

NOTE Hey, maybe the government could pay me 2008 prices for my house? Or, since I own AIG, AIG could? Kinda like a public-private partnership?

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

You Need To Add Democratic Looting

or at least Bipartisan Looting to your choices for categorizing posts.

And, FWIW, I think this Public-Private Partnership meme has legs.

"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt