The Boston Globe:
WASHINGTON - The Senate adjourned last night without passing a Democratic economic-stimulus plan, after a day of negotiations by a bipartisan group working to trim from it as much as $100 billion and fashion a compromise lean enough to win the Republican votes necessary for passage
"Everyone is trying in good faith to move the ball down the court," Senate majority leader Harry Reid told a packed chamber of colleagues when he sent them home at 8:40 p.m. with orders to reconvene this morning. "I wish I had all the answers, but the answers are not here tonight."
All those good-faith Republicans want to do is make the stimulus bill "lean." What could possibly go wrong?
The good news is that, whatever happens, it will be done in a state of abject, Shock Doctrine fear.
The other good news is how really good "good faith" is:
"As I have explained to people in that group, they cannot hold the president of the United States hostage," Reid said. "If they think they're going to rewrite this bill and Barack Obama is going to walk away from what he is trying to do for the American people, they've got another thought coming."
In the unlikely event that the good-faith Republicans don't act all good-faithy, they're going to have to have new thoughts! What might those thoughts be -- perhaps that they don't need an actual majority to continue to control the national conversation?
Oh, and what, I wonder, is Obama "trying to do for the American people." I simply can't wait to find out!
- vastleft's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page


Comments
One thing I did notice...
... is that Obama's rhetoric is the reverse of "nothing to fear but fear itself." In fact, he threatens catastrophe if the act is not passed. Reminds me of someone, let me see....
How about just selling the bill on the merits, like that it helps people who need it, as opposed to people who don't?
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
If you haven't caught this yet
Arthur's the go-to guy on the fearmongering:
http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/200...
Wish he'd listen to Krugman and others like him.
But that would be too partisan.
Blech!
Clinton's econ advisers ranged from Stiglitz to Rubin--Obama
did not include anyone outside the Big Bankster Boiz comfort zone. Or, did I miss some outlier who has his ear? (Volker and Warren Buffett are not outside the comfort zone, imo.)
Does Obama have a real understanding of what he wants to accomplish, much less what needs to be done?
Obama just named team of econ advisers -- no list of names. Bloomberg has more:
This is not good--Martin Feldstein is on the conservative side -- who's there to balance him???
As I said, one day does not a trend make with Obama. Same old, same old. Oh, my.
Obama billed econ group as way to get "fresh voices," "new ways
of thinking. Given the group assembled, this is almost hysterically funny. Except it is just part and parcel of the limited range of thinking surrounding Obama.
Irony? Stupidity? Whatever it is, it burns.
These "Advisors" are the pigs at the trough. Blech. n/t
n/t
I love this job!
Want to feel a tad worse? Obama wants Tort Reform lobbyist to
oversee legal policy and nominations to Justice Dept. From Seeing the Forest, where Dave Johnson's comment is, "No, no, no. What is going on here?"
From the LATimes, "Likely Justice Department nominee faces ethics hurdle":
Possible waiver guy, but WH aruging that he can recuse himself from issues on which he lobbied, so he doesn't really need a waiver....
Gee, we get rid of Repubs and our Dem prez finds people who represent their objectives for the Dem administration. (Should the Dem in Dem prez be in quotation marks?)
How're ya liking this so far, Dems?
Jawbone, I'm feeling "fairly" nauseous and terrified. n/t
n/t
I love this job!
Elixir, try Yves' Antidote du Jour, + link to U-6 15.4% unemp'mt
(Of course, after reading her posts on econ stuff, along with the real unemployment number, just one antidote may not be enough. You can scroll through for other Antidotes du Jour...). Scroll down to the bottom photos...of kitten and birdie! Makes me smile just thinking about the Total Cuteness. And, in the 3rd photo, isn't that little kitteh actually smiling?
Hhhmmm -- I'd made a mistake and had today's unemployment report link pasted, the one showing the alternative unemployment numbers. The number which best approximates total un- and underemployment, U-6, has it up to 15.4%, up from 13.5% in December (not seasonally adjusted). Yikes.
There are a total of six alternative measures of labor underutilization. Dave Johnson at Seeing the Forest told me U-6 most closely emulates the full unemployment number which was used up to the Johnson administration. Atrios, iirc, concurs. It's a good number to know -- Obama and our representatives ought to know it by heart.
During the Great Depression, people who were working for the government make--work programs (which actually created jobs and people in those jobs created things of lasting value to the nation, such as parks all over the country, art works which let us see what life what like then, etc.) were counted as unemployed. So, how close are we to Great Depression unemployment levels? Not there yet, but....
What happened to that five day work week?
Lazy sacks of ...
I'd sell a kidney for ONE day of honest work.