Exxon Mobil's chairman and chief executive, Rex W. Tillerson, defeated a shareholder effort last week to take away one of his jobs at an annual meeting punctuated by a debate of the company's policy toward renewable energy and global warming. The vote was nonbinding and would not have guaranteed a change in company policies had it passed. But by defeating the challenge, which was supported this year by many members of the Rockefeller family, Tillerson avoided a serious rebuke to his authority to run the world's largest independent oil company, the NY Times reports.
The resolution to divide the top two positions won 39.5 percent of the vote, about the same as last year. The vote was announced after a robust debate among shareholders, those who defended management as a great engine for profits and those who argued that a narrow focus on developing oil and gas as energy sources would threaten the global environment and ultimately the company's financial health, reports Times writer Clifford Krauss.
"Exxon Mobil is acting like a dinosaur now, not adopting to a changing environment," a New York shareholder, Stephen Viederman, said. A Dominican sister from New Jersey, Pat Daley, said, "We're faced with a profound moral and business challenge," according to the Times story.
- DCblogger's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page
Comments
Wow
I had no idea this sort of thing was going on. What is the meaning of it? Is there really a shift on global warming among the rich and powerful (Rockefellers are that, I suppose) based on enlightened self-interest?
And what should I be reading to see this kind of news?
Policy not party!
enlightened self-interest?
I would think enlightened self interest. The more clueful element of our corporate overlords are finally beginning to twig on the significance of peak oil. This was the first round. Check out the links, Exxon is just begging for a hostile takover, or a larger shareholder rebellion next year.