Disgusted and frustrated as I am that any Democrats supported Bush’s latest assault on the Constitution, let’s take a look at the “Protect America Act” box score before we flip the bozo bit on “the Democrats”:

Disgusted and frustrated as I am, looking at these numbers and saying Democrats are no different from Republicans still strikes me as the province of concern trolls.
The problem is a subset of Dems who are no different from Republicans. And you will know them by the trail of votes.
I’m not schooled on whether there were procedural opportunities for Dem leaders to prevent this vote from happening at all.
But given that it did, it’s clear that Pelosi and Reid can’t stop the bleeding in no-brainer votes, including the similarly unnecessary cave-in on the recent Iraq appropriation.
A failure of leadership and a failure of the led. That Blue Dog Democrats represented 30 of the Dems’ 41 House yea votes suggests that our deal with the DINOs is as valuable as a Confederate dollar.
Yes, our stitched-together majority gets us some committee chairmanships, but so far there is little sense of “playing to win,” even among folks like the estimable Henry Waxman.
At this point, it looks like until and unless we have fewer DINOs than the Old Testament, things aren’t going to get any better — not without some genuine leadership, which is in very short supply.
NOTE: I was unable to find a Senate roll-call, so I backed into some of the numbers by reviewing various articles. I’ll happily post corrections if more reliable figures are available.











Front page
Can this turd be buffed?
I was about to quote Glenn (“The Tough and Strong Democrats”), VL, but you’ve forestalled me, really:
Failure especially of Reid and Pelosi, who weren’t out creating the political cover that the Little Blue Puppies so obviously needed.
Atrios has a typically level-headed response:
I can see what you’re saying, and where it goes… Boils down to supporting Dodd, because alone among the Democratic candidates, he gets this, and going after the Little Blue Puppies with the usual tools…
But… Jesus. I’m tired, ya know? And I can only imagine what those who have given so much more than I have feel.
No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.
Yup, I'm tired, too
Sad how misplaced any triumphalism after the midterm elections was. Miles to go before we sleep.
Midterms an accident?
Diversion?
Pacification?
I'd call the midterms...
… a success so compromised as to be a failure.
Midterms cut the legs out from under e-voting reforms
At least they did for a long while. Now we’re starting to hear the subject come back up for air—some decertifications here and results of hacking studies there—but the groundswell that was building just went poof. Democrats could win, therefore that proves the machines are honest…right? You know this, um, how?
Because it was allowed to operate honestly (we’ll assume) one time does not mean this will always be the case. There was way too much triumphalism and mockery of “Karl’s math” and shit, when nothing had really changed at all.
Which is to say nothing whatever about the less-than-useful results the alleged change of power has accomplished so far. Now excuse me, I have to go sent another rude letter to Rep. John Tanner (TN-BlueBallDog).
I just heard Frank Rich on RFK, Jr's show...
… and he was basically singing “Ding, Dong the Witch Is Dead” about the Repubs. I’m a Red Sox fan, so I don’t do triumphalism.
Perhaps this election will be decisive. But we won’t know until and unless the Constitution is restored and the troops are home.
And Edwards?
You aren’t throwing Edwards in with Dodd? Why not?
Dems Suck, Dems Don't Suck...
It’s hard to not get stuck in a categorical Up Or Down vote on a large group of people, but it’s a mistake IMNSHO.
There are different levels of disgust.
One of the rhetorical traps is to equate any criticism of the Democratic Party with the the Nader line that “there is no difference” between the two parties.
Even a registered Green Party, voted for Nader twice type of person like myself realizes there is a difference: as a generalization the GOP’ers are criminally incompetent authoritarian maniacs, the Dems are craven spineless self-interested corporate opportunists.
Sure, in the FISA vote, the Blue Dogs were the obvious culprits. But the responsibility also lies heavily with the Dem leadership for not, well, showing any f-ing leadership. How is it that Repugs vote in lock step as a united block and the Dems don’t, especially when it really counts?
The way I’m starting to think of it, the only value of the current Democratic Party is it’s functional ability to displace Republicans in government.
So, we should get out and vote for Democrats (when there is no viable Green alternative), but at the same time never refrain from criticising the Dems, and never stop working to change the frames (overton window) for fear that it might hurt a Democrat’s election chances.
It’s a two pronged attack. On the electoral track, displace the GOP out of office. On the ideological/media track, simultaneously work to move public opinion to the left (to justice and reality) so that politicians will have to work within our frames.
shystee,
I agree with all of your points, except one.
The “there is no difference” meme — which is one that Nader famously endorsed in 2000 and which he tacitly or otherwise endorsed recently by hauling in with World Can’t Wait — is not brought up here through rhetorical hocus-pocus. In comments threads throughout blogtopia (no, I didn’t coin that phrase), criticism of the Dems over the FISA vote and need to restore Constitutionality has regularly been met with a fair amount of that talk. My mission in these posts and comments is to do exactly as you describe — to ensure that there’s a difference between properly criticizing Democratic failings and adopting the defeatist “no difference” position.
+1, Shysee. No, +1000
I think we’re finally on the same page on all this. Sorry it took me so long. But as I catch up on this story—I’m out of the country, being surveilled—as I said elsewhere, of the two great (shorthand) explanations for everything, Conspiracy and Fuckup, it’s hard to believe that even the Beltway Dems could be this fucked up. Reid and Pelois had to have known what was in that legislation.
So, it looks to me more like the Widdling Blue Puppies were giving cover to Reid and Pelosi, rather than (my first thought) Reid and Pelosi not giving cover to them.
Risen’s article also touches, at the end, at what is surely a driver for all this (at the end, of course). the telcos:
Splendid.
Leaving the surveillance OK with Gonzales is, to me, the tipoff the Dem leadership was in the know. Not possible for them to have ignored this. They want the power in 2008…
NOTE Let’s also put an end to this foolish circular firing squad metaphor. The smart ones are going to duck. Dodd already has. But not Hillary, Edwards, or Obama. Fire away!
No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.
Spinelessless and disunity still have the ring...
… of Occam’s razor to me.
The symbol for much of the Democratic Party should be the deer in the headlights.
I think they were given an endoscopic sneak-peek into Chertoff’s gut, and they were sufficiently freaked out to roll over like good little Rodrique dogs.
Maybe my conspiracydar’s on the fritz, but methinks the lameness shoe still fits.
Lambert, please explain
I’m feeling stupid here. How is handing over the reins to Gonzales about the Dems wanting power in 2008? I’m not following the logic.
“A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” - Margaret Mead
THB, power accrues to the office, not the holder thereof
We’re finding out just how badly it fucks the constitutional design up to have bad people in positions of power, enough of them, and all working to the same bad ends. How much worse then—Constitutional-restorationally speaking— is the situation going to be when it’s a Democratic president, and a Democratically nominated and confirmed Attorney General, with that same excessive, unbalanced, unreviewable power that was just given to Gonzales?
Gandalf had some things to say about what exessive power does to even a well-intentioned person. That Democratic president is going to have a hell of a time saying “Take this power away from my Attorney General, who would of course only use it for Good but shouldn’t be using it at all.”
Because it will have been in place for a couple of years by that time, and you must know that some incident will have occurred which will be Loudly and Publicly Thwarted, a la the tv show “24”, because of something eavesdropped on via Gonzales go-ahead.
Hell, this “event” will probably have been staged before Congress comes back at the end of August. Not that I’m getting paranoia on top of massive depression at the moment or anything.
Thanks, Xan
I was temporarily lost in a reverie of thinking the Dems had the interests of the nation at heart. I am pretty frackin naive sometimes.
“A small group of thoughtful people could change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” - Margaret Mead