POTL
, n. People Of The Lie. Coined by Christian psychiatrist and theologian M. Scott Peck in his book The People of the Lie, which is, among other things, an examination of the nature of human evil. Peck quotes Martin Buber:
Since the primary motive of evil is disguise, one of the places evil people are most likely to be found is within the church.
Additional excerpts can be found here. "Utterly dedicated to preserving their self-image of perfection, they are unceasingly engaged in the effort to maintain the appearance of moral purity. They are acutely sensitive to social norms and what others might think of them. They seem to live lives that are above reproach. The words "image", "appearance" and "outwardly" are crucial to understanding the morality of 'the evil'. While they lack any motivation to be good, they intensely desire to appear good. Their goodness is all on a level of pretense. It is in effect a lie. Actually the lie is designed not so much to deceive others as to deceive themselves. We lie only when we are attempting to cover up something we know to be illicit. At one and the same time 'the evil' are aware of their evil and desperately trying to avoid the awareness." Peck's material, I feel, has great potential for analyzing and deconstructing the nature and behavior of the wing of the Republican party that has captured our government. With the caveats, that Peck raises, that evil is very dangerous to analyze--since we are, after all, all vulnerable to it.
See also: VRWC
Comments
Change we can believe in
This will have been one of the few political bright spots of the year, for me, if Franken pulls this off.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...
Senator Al Franken!
Hell yes. You think Franken is down with the post-partisan unity pony parade?
Speaking of...
http://www.correntewire.com/why_does_al_...
Another brush with greatness
As long as I'm blogwhoring my brushes with greatness, here's my brush with Al:
http://vastleft.blogspot.com/2006/09/fra...
Jim Ramstad leads for interim MN senator
Apparently the view is that given the inevitable court challenges, an interim MN senator is nearly a certainty (look for the Dec. 19 shows video at that link). Minnesota has a Republican governor (you know, Tim Pawlenty....), but even the Republicans on the panel do not think Pawlenty would prejudice the process by reappointing Coleman. The name that came up was the recently retired Jim Ramstad, who actually does have some bi-partisan respect.
-----------------------------
I'm not such a bad guy once you get to know me.
I like Al
but I don't think it speaks well of him that he was unable in this huge Dem year to deliver a convincing spanking to Coleman, who has always seemed to me to be extremely weak. I will say that I don't have any insight into MN politics--maybe someone who does will explain why Coleman was competitive this year. But if Franken couldn't win in a walk in 2008, how will he do when the winds of political fortune shift again?
I don't live there
But a friend does, and he explained it this way.
MN voters are picky, and like to buck trends. These are the people who elected Wellstone and Jesse Ventura.
My take on it is, is that Obama didn't do enough to associate himself with the Democratic brand, so his victories, didn't translate into downticket victories.
He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond
Thanks!
Nutty Minnesotans! They have elected a very eccentric crowd of politicians recently, when you look at them all together. I hear what you're saying about Obama, but I don't know if Al Franken did enough to associate himself with Obama, either--as I recall, he's got ties to the Clintons from the 1990s, but he didn't endorse anyone in the primary (probably a good thing, because Obama mopped the floor with Clinton in MN.)
Were there any senate races that Obama campaigned in? He sure spent a lot of time here in Colorado, but I don't recall a single event he did to promote Mark Udall, our (successful) Dem senate candidate. (Then again, in Colorado it may have been risky for Udall to brand himself a Dem so clearly--at least it was until 2008, anyway!)