Gonzo: FBI "snooping" broke law

But read on. The FBI program that uses the letters is a "Friendster for Fascists," which is the part of the story that's getting buried. AP:

The nation's top two law enforcement officials acknowledged Friday the FBI broke the law to secretly pry out personal information about Americans. They apologized and vowed to prevent further illegal intrusions.

Krugman was right. Two words: subpoena power. Can anyone imagine these guys apologizing for anything--or the illegality even coming to light--if the Congress were still in Republican hands?

Gonzales left open the possibility of pursuing criminal charges against FBI agents or lawyers who improperly used the USA Patriot Act in pursuit of suspected terrorists and spies.

I say, be bold! Prosecute the "bad apples"!

And now an early candidate for Understatement of the Year:

"We have some work to do to reassure members of Congress and the American people that we are serious about being responsible in the exercise of these authorities," he said.

Indeed. The numbers look really bad.

In 2000, for example, the FBI issued an estimated 8,500 requests. That number peaked in 2004 with 56,000. Overall, the FBI reported issuing 143,074 requests in national security letters between 2003 and 2005.

But that did not include an additional 8,850 requests that were never recorded in the FBI's database, the audit found. A sample review of 77 case files at four FBI field offices showed that agents had underreported the number of national security letter requests by about 22 percent.

And now, from a Corrente post w-a-a-a-y back in 2005, here are some things that the AP story does not mention about the information that the FBI has been gathering.

1. These records are private records; for example, financial records of ordinary Americans who had "casual or unwitting contact" with a suspect.

2. The record-keeping is not reviewed after the fact for accuracy.

3. The records are widely shared among Federal agencies, the states, localities, and "appropriate private sector entities." (Wackenhut? The RNC?)

4. The records are never discarded.

5. The records are gathered using a technique called "contact chaining," meaning that if Alice is a suspect and knows Bob, then Bob is surveilled, and if Bob knows Carol, Carla, and Charles, they are surveilled. And since everyone in the world can be connected via "six degrees of separation," that means that the number of people surveilled under this program will grow exponentially if left unchecked.

The program, for which the National Security letters are just a tool, really is a Friendster for Fascists.

It would be nice to see this aspect of the program covered by our famously free press.

NOTE I assume that Gonzo's taking the modified limited hangout route here, and will try to get away with disciplining the "bad apples," while trying to distract us from the real story, which is the program that used the data gathered from the letters.

UPDATE Glenn Greenwald has a superb article up, that notes, among much else, that Bush put out a signing statement when the Patriot Act was renewed that said he'd ignore the SNL provisions.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

corrente stays atop this issue

oops, is that too authoritarian?

still, someone must be the voice in the wilderness.

gonzo will go down in history as a great shame, and there are times when i think his absurdity proves that he understands that.

Breaking the law to get the data is bad

But what they are doing with the data is worse. The contact chaining is the key, since you could build this system out to include everybody, since contact chaining is really a form of social network analysis.

That's what Gonzo is trying to deflect. And that's the test of whether the Democrats get it on this issue. See the 2005 story; Biden didn't get it at all.

No authoritarians were tortured in the writing of this post.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

But you don't have to worry if you're innocent....

... this is the line that our troglodytic war criminals think is the Final Answer. And it is harped on incessantly by the right wing. My favorite; a CSpan caller this morning enjoining her audience to stop talking about the Patriot Act on the phone and computers, so that our spies wouldn't have to spend their time tracking down all your contacts to see if you're a terrorist.

To which I say; The PATRIOT ACT is in real danger if the FBI ever gets the idea that the FOCUS ON FAMILY is going to use it to soften up the border security patrols. And, hey, fellow communists at SMU, isn't this a treat, we can hardly wait for the Bush Liebury to be here so we can GET ALL THOSE SECRET RECORDS.

So: Any more suggestions for real good directions for the spies to direct their research?

Ruth

Ruth

Help Corrente ...

... keep the heat on!

Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.

No PayPal Account required! Thank you!

Recent comments

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.