Wed, 08/27/2008 - 11:40pm — lambert
Obama makes unscripted convention appearance.
Why, the story is by an old friend: Nedra Pickler's skintern, Beth Fouhy! [waves]
»
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Front page
Comments
"Unscripted"
Yeah, unscripted like a "reality" show. In fact, the whole convention feels like a 'reality' show.
You and Bowers
Haw.:
Of course, when Obama pops out of a cake tomorrow, and all the OFB
text all the other OFB about how cool it is... Problem solved!
But who knows. Maybe it will be really great. "Tell them the truth and it feels like hell." Maybe. We can always hope.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
A notable Obama quote from your link:
Let's fix that quote:
Here's some questions for anyone (I don't know the answers):
Does Obama ever call himself a Democrat?
Does he ever mention the Democratic party?
Will he utter the word "Democrat" tomorrow night?
Or ever?
"You'd better get this straight. Wise up before it's too late." -- Sister Sledge
"Doubt is a wall I must climb." -- Michael McDermott
Randall, the only collective organizations
Obama understands and values are churches and faith-based orgs. Everything else is the work of empowered individuals in his view.
Parties, unions, government... have you ever heard Obama mention the essential role of these orgs for social progress and justice?
Go Global!
Go Global!
FrenchDoc, I wish I could believe it was honest shortsightedness
But after the Clintons both delivered such pointed defenses of Democrats and landed such heavy blows on the Republicans and their ideas, Obama's refusal to utter the magic word "Democrat" even as he praised the Clintons, seems to me equally pointed.
He and his campaign act like people who want to put a final end to the Democratic party as a vehicle for political change.
"You'd better get this straight. Wise up before it's too late." -- Sister Sledge
"Doubt is a wall I must climb." -- Michael McDermott
They May Want That
But it isn't going to happen. And if it somehow does happen then another opposition party will spring up to take the Democrats' place. There's always opposition. Sometimes it's disorganized and has its head up its ass, but it's always there. If it weren't, they wouldn't have needed to build cages outside the convention hall.
+100
And it it weren't, they wouldn't have had to game the vote from the floor, either. As a child of six could see. God, they suck.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
Oh, you nailed it
I completely agree... and the signs have been obvious all along for anyone paying attention.
The Clintons remind us why we should be proud to be Democrats and what we stand for (no Bowerist squishy goo goo here, it's all solid policy stuff)... and then, the kool kidz come along and demean this stuff.
IT's disgusting.
Go Global!
Go Global!
It is literally short-sightedness...
It should be obvious by now that Team Obama had no second act planned -- there was no plan for sequeing from "primary" into "general election" mode. Its all being (poorly) improvised.
What is even more frightening is that there is no plan for going from "general election" mode into "governing" mode -- there is no Obama agenda, merely talking points.
Tuesday night's Hillary speech was a glance at an alternate reality -- it was, in fact, and adaptation of her acceptance speech for the nomination.... and would have been the culmination of four days of pushing Democratic Party values and priorities.
And it would have worked -- not merely to catapult her to the Presidency, but to make it possible for her to govern based on a Democratic agenda.
Link on "adaptation"?
Interesting data point, if true.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
No link...
...just talking out my butt (or making an astute observation based on how Clinton ran her primary campaign -- take your pick!) ;)
I say "adaptation" because Clinton would have adopted a signature issue (most likely, health care) and there would have been more focus on that.
But the litany about "the people she met during the primaries", and the endless list of "Democratic" talking points really didn't belong in that speech. Nobody cares about the people Hillary met on the campaign trail because she lost, and Team Obama doesn't care about what the Democratic Party (ostensibly) stands for.
Connecting the dots: equilibrium, instability, and loads
So great it was, I thought it was an adaptation of her inaugural speech.
If I were an Obamocrat -- i.e., a democrat in name only, by now I'd be embarrassed and humiliated at his teh Grecian formula columns. Are we sure they're not simply Roman...OOPS, er, I mean Obamian, or is it Obamic?
ITMT, hundreds of thousands of fellow Americans are preparing to flee for their very lives, as the opportunistic Bush and his feral government prepare for another "perfect" storm.
But party on, all you kewl kids. Have another h'ordeuvre?
Obama, Clyburn and Dems
Given Clyburns comments about Gore from VL's earlier post, is it possible that the Obamas, and Clyburn, don't like the Dems? Seriously, all Obama has to do is wrap himself in the Democratic brand and its hard to lose. But he's not doing that. Does he not like the Dems, is he utterly clueless or does he believe the hype?
He's too smart to be THAT clueless.
No, he's been running a non-partisan, non-issue campaign all along. And both Clintons SHARPLY called him on it - in the nicest way, of course. So nice that hardly anyone seemed to notice it.
But Obama pushed back HARD with his non-partisan praise of Bill. He's a ferocious gatekeeper for corporate America.
"You'd better get this straight. Wise up before it's too late." -- Sister Sledge
"Doubt is a wall I must climb." -- Michael McDermott
He is that clueless....
...Obama may (or may not be) smart, but his hubris and narcissism make it impossible for him to realize that the clues are, in fact, clues rather than random information.
It really is all about Obama.
While there are remarkable parallels between Bush and Obama, what motivated them to run is slightly different. For Bush, being president sounded like "fun". For Obama, winning the Presidency is the goal. Both merely wanted to "be President" -- Bush because he liked the idea of being in control, and Obama because it puts him in the spotlight. Neither of them ever gave much of a thought to governing, and the responsibilities of being President -- had they done so, they would have not run (or at least not run when they did.)
Personally, I don't think that Obama got into this race to win it -- it was all about positioning for the future when he started. But Axelrod's plan turned out to be too good -- rather than reinforcing the positioning of Obama as "the future of the party", it turned out to be a path to the nomination. And the "clues" that "smart Obama" should have picked up faded into oblivion as the possibility of "winning" became the most important considration.
I'm Still Not...
I'm still not sure whether Obama genuinely hates solid Dems and is trying to purge them, of if he simply pretends to try to purge them to save his own candidacy?
In a year when the Democratic brand is so sellable, I wonder if he recognized (rightly) that he couldn't compete with Hillary to become Mr./Mrs. Democrat, and so tried to damage the brand so he could slip in something newer and flashier (Obamacrats/Obamacans), or if he ideologically wants to purge the party of the real Democrats and replace them with something else and in his view, better?
I still can't read him. I do know that Axlerod said back very early that he knew Obama couldn't run as a traditional Democrat and win, so they weren't even trying to do that, so that makes me lean more towards the theory that he recognized the power and stature of the Clinton's and it was a tactical and not ideological move, but I really don't know.
What's not to "read"?
It was clear to me. [Back atcha, Barack.]
If his moves are tactical, they betray the soullessness of the campaign, if not the callous shallowness of the man.
Cult of personality
Has anyone else noticed how everyone at this convention is saying "Barack Obama" will do this or "Barack Obama" will do that?
Not once have I heard someone say "Barack Obama and the Democratic Party will do X" or "With Barack Obama as President, we will do Y". Heck, JOE BIDEN, as far as I could tell, never once said "Barack Obama and I will do Z", instead just saying "Barack Obama" would accomplish certain things.
The cult of Obama is becoming quite frightening indeed. I don't think we've ever seen such a deliberate attempt to create the cult of personality in this country, on such a massive scale.
Which McCain is NOT doing
So, indeed, this could be the most important election.
Just not for the reason people think. Those Shepherd Fairey images totally give me the creeps. Manufacturing dissent my sweet Aunt Fanny. There's probably generational cultural nuance I'm missing, but they still give me the creeps.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
iPodican party
That would be the generic format of what Axelrod, et.al. are trying to create out of the formerly Democratic party.
Oblique hat tip to Bageant's pal.
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
It's his JOB to be clueless.
He's doing what the corporate elite are paying him to do - erase the Democratic brand altogether. Since that makes it all EVEN MORE about him, he's happy to oblige.
The process which began under Carter and continued under Clinton is nearly complete.
"You'd better get this straight. Wise up before it's too late." -- Sister Sledge
"Doubt is a wall I must climb." -- Michael McDermott
Uh oh, better golf MYSELF
Tee up) I compared "Obamacan" to "iPodacan"
1)iPods have interchangable skins
2) I said Obama's skin doesn't matter and he is interchangable with a white man!!!
Gaaak!!!!
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
Herb, you're on fire!
LOL!
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
This string of comments has made me terribly sad--bcz it really
does seem that Obama wants to erase the word "Democratic" with a capital "D" and "Democrats."
He'll replace it with...what? ObamaNation? What?
However, the art work developed around Obama is so reminiscent of the Soviet Union's style it's scary.
BTW, last night I did not believe that Bill Clinton truly
believed what he was saying about Obama's readiness and experience. I actually felt uncomfortable not feeling able to believe what he was saying to us...but it's all politics, right?
Same foreign affairs experience as Bill Clinton, who had spent a a Fulbright year in England? Traveled to Russia when it was not easy to do so? Who had been steeped in politics since he was a kid? Who had been going to international meetings for years as governor?
Yes, Obama held a subcommittee chair on the foreign affairs committee--and he did hold a meeting, finally, in April '08, then was asked by Biden to hold another one in July (prompted by a letter from a Repub member)--but these were to pass on nominations and were not information gathering hearings. Biden said he had covered everything needing attention at his committee's meetings.... Heh.
Administative experience? Getting things implemented and through a legislature experience? Not so much.
Bill Clinton did push the Democratic brand and values last night, as did Hillary--wonder if Obama will use his party's name tonight, other than to link to bipartisaning with Repubs.
BTW, Brian Lehrer of WNYC's public radio station is broadcasting his program from Denver, and has been asking delegate guests to describe in a few words what being a Democrat means or to counter the usual 6 word Repubs' description: One woman said Dems afer "for people," everyone else has either been at a loss or rambled on about particular programs. He did not ask that question of John Lewis, but he did as him he felt any embarrassment at having been a strong Hillary supporter early on!!!
It was so unscripted they even scheduled enough time before 11PM
EDT to get his appearance covered by the Broadcast networks!
me too, jawbone!
i watched a few minutes of clinton, bill's speech this morning at a friend's house (mostly i've refused to watch any of the convention silliness live or taped). what struck me was how he didn't seem like himself at all, that "thing," or glow, or whatever you want to call it, just didn't seem there to me.
the two times the camera cut to hillary, she wasn't smiling at all and looked very tense. so too Michelle Obama. it was very weird and my overall sense was that by Bill's usual standards, the speech was a flop.
Anyone listening to that speech
could see what was and what wasn't genuine... ripping the Reps and their "extreme ideology" (Gingrich) a new one? Genuine... he was obviously having fun with that, "thanks but no thanks"... and thank goodness both Clintons made the case that the Reps can't govern.
All this "Obama is great" stuff? It's like the Obama campaign had given him a list of talking points he should pepper in his speech and he just listed them one by one, one after the other in his speech. It actually gave me a chuckle when I heard him. I thought "Bill, you're so full of it".
What matters to me is that both Clintons reminded everybody that being a Dem is not about hopey-changey religious-based bi-partisanship... it's about kicking the Reps' extremist ass.
Go Global!
Go Global!
Bill Clinton last night...
asserted, a number of times, that Obama was ready to lead, ready to be CIC; he did it in inimitable Big Dog form, but provided no actual evidence or argument for it. (The only "argument" I recall was his reminding us that he himself was said to be too inexperienced in national politics when he ran for president in 1992.)
OK, it was a convention speech. But still.
Contrast that with the lines he managed to keep in about the economy, where his heart seemed to be much more in it. At least, it seemed that way to me.
And I wonder if the idea that Hillary didn't mention Obama often enough in her speech came from the fact that she used the word "Democrat" and variants thereon much more often?
---------------
We can't afford not to have single-payer!
a little night - about that evidence or argument
Because there is little to none, imo.
I agree with the observations on what was real/false about the
Clinton speeches. The real was their enthusiasm about the party and about the American people they want it to serve. The false (and it HAD to be false) was the assertions that Obama was fit to lead.
The litany of laws passed, policies embraced, and everyday troubles observed was so much more than a trip down Memory Lane or an exercise in self-justification. It was a strong rebuke of Obama's personality theory of government and a VERY strong warning that they will rally the base against him and his power apparatus if he persists on this onanistic course.
Obama's reply, a praise of the Clintons in EXCLUSIVELY personal terms, is best taken as a curt acceptance of that challenge, a subliminal snarl:
"Yes it IS all about me. What the fuck ya gonna do about it?"
"You'd better get this straight. Wise up before it's too late." -- Sister Sledge
"Doubt is a wall I must climb." -- Michael McDermott
i thought Bill was overdoing it--
it rang false to me too--
he only perked up when he got to issues and the party itself, not with the "Obama is this" and "Obama is that".
Of course, whaleshaman...
There is next to none. I was just observing that Bill's repeated assertions about Obama in that speech rang false, because it's so unlike his usual rhetoric.
I left off my watching yesterday feeling that this had been "humiliate the Clintons" day for the DNC and Obama: first Hillary made to ask for acclamation, then Bill having say Obama a half-hundred times. (I noticed Michelle's tight-lipped smile get a little bigger each time her husband's name was mentioned.)
The two of them (the Clintons) emerged strong as ever, anyway.
---------------
We can't afford not to have single-payer!
Contrasts
I was going to mention just how small of a man Obama showed himself to be last night. I guess that's what passes for "regal" these days. After the pains and the lengths that tens of thousands went through to make his "coronation" as seamless as possible. After all of the pride that his many opponents (and supporters) had to swallow. After all of the precedents that were broken to make him look pretty. Still, he can hardly find it within himself to give them more than a royal back-handed "show the ring" wave, look down his nose, and mumble out some half-hearted "thanks for being here and making my party the success everything I touch always becomes." Look at that video again. Everything is coached in terms of how wonderful his convention went for him.
Nice.
More data to put in the "November Equation".
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
-----------------------------
Around these parts we call cucumber slices circle bites
I dunno Herb,
I yield to none in my suspicion and dislike, but maybe I should, because on viewing the video, I was impressed with the respect paid to the Clintons by Obama. I could kinda see the thought bubble "it's about f***ing time" over Bill's head, though. (Hillary, bless her, almost never lets the thought bubble become legible. That's one reason they hate her.)
Moreover, the first words out of Obama's mouth were "Hello Democrats", yes?
Facts are stubborn things. But maybe I'm just irredeemably naive.
Policy not party!
Policy not party!
Well, it's a rock star thing
He's explaining about the stadium seating, and when the next set will be, about which there might have been some confusion. I don't see him looking down on people, except insofar as rock stars look down on people (which is a pretty big insofar). It's informal, because that's the context.
"Hello Democrats" was good; "[Democratic] Presidents who put people first" would have been better.
I thought it was funny how he stumbled on top vs bottom up, because that's really the issue, isn't it? The creation myth of the new Democratic Party.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
The stumbling rock star,
the stumbling part especially, worries me. And it's not just when he's speaking extemporaneously - when he was reading the statement on Georgia, his delivery was atrocious. I sometimes think he must have a medical problem.
As for the creation myth, it would be interesting to see some reporting (that will never get done) comparing the grass-rootedness of the various primary campaigns.
Policy not party!
Policy not party!
What is Lambert’s phrase,
What is Lambert's phrase, party invariant or some such? Wow, I could be reading the transcript of a Monica Crowley, or Chris Matthews broadcast. And, as Lambert complained in another post about hearing the same arguments, I got the point, you don't like him. You loath him. He seems to be yet another Democrat who fits the Republican idea of Dems who run for President, snobs, elitist, out of touch. Might as well not forget as McCain said, he didn't even "feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform."
At least give the Clintons their due. She gave a great speech. He gave a pretty good one. They re affirmed things that the Democratic party stands for, in the breach if not completely in the observance. They got the crowds rev'd which is what good party people do.
Someone mentioned, I can't find it right now, about how Obama chose to minimize a tribute to Johnson. Talk about a Democrat who ruined things for himself, the party and the country. He knew the war was going to screw everything up, not the least the War on Poverty but he couldn't back off from it. And the War on Poverty is discredited. Wingers have no problem using misrepresentations of it as proofs of Reagan's doctrine that government is the problem.
I remember that Al Gore chose Joe Lieberman for his running mate. Talk about bad judgment. But he's come a long way since then. I never was for Obama. But I wonder if this guy is card board or he can change. I wonder what a few months of Republican obstruction might do to his post partisan ideas. From what I'm reading here though, he's not even human.
"Party invariant" is not my phrase
It's gqmartinez. Here is the post.
As for the rest, Oh, he's human enough.
[rimshot, laughter]
Sheesh.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
"Ready to Lead"
Was anyone literally on the edge of their chairs and nearly gasping when Bill said that Obama's "ready to lead?" I ask, because it almost like he was going to betray Hillary and add "on day one", which is when I was determined to change the channel. Maybe, it's just reading too much into it, but he went right up to the line, but never crossed it, and this was all throughout the speech.
I agree, there were only a few times when Bill became Bill, again. You know, where he switches into his crackly, whisper-like voice. That's the only time I saw him. All the rest was an out-of-body experience for him.