
Tone, Truth, and the Democratic Party
According to the storyline that drives many advocacy groups and Democratic activists - a storyline often reflected in comments on this blog - we are up against a sharply partisan, radically conservative, take-no-prisoners Republican party. They have beaten ustwicethree times by energizing their base with red meat rhetoric and single-minded devotion and discipline to their agenda. In order to beat them, it is necessary for Democrats to get some backbone, give as good as they get, brook no compromise, drive out Democrats who are interested in "appeasing" the right wing, and enforce a more clearly progressive agenda. The country, finally knowing what we stand for and seeing a sharp contrast, will rally to our side and thereby usher in a new progressive era.I think this perspective misreads the American people.
Actually, my correction could still be wrong:
The Rs have "beaten" "us" four times -- if you count the Obama administration as an R win. And now, The Big O's going to double down on FAIL!
But Jeebus. How could anybody read that post and not know that Obama was full of shit? Yes, we were prematurely correct. Again.
NOTE Of course, the idea that the Rs "win" and the Ds "lose" accepts the frame that the legacy parties are in conflict, instead of a unitary system. Ditto FAIL; from the perspective of Obama's rentiers, Obama has been a roaring success. It's always interesting to go back and read one's old posts, the ones that assume that the Ds and the career "progessives" in the "creative class" were actually something other than full service providers for the MOTU
. Such innocence. We actually owe Obama and his fans a great deal for disabusing us of such silly notions. Reminder via Allegre's Corner.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
That lying sack of shit.
He has a lot of fucking gall to dismiss an approach that's never been tried in the first place.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
Obama supposedly posted at DK?
I won't go over there but is that where this is from?
And if yes, then "What jumpjet said".
Yes, he did
I fixed the link, which I had forgotten to put in.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Thanks - but now I'm sorry I went to read it.
What bullshit.
I particularly enjoyed this:
the Dems and their "idealistic" supporters
Having spent quite a bit of energy recently trying to persuade the enablers on the Left at a certain website to give up on any sort of dream of reform from within the Party, I can tell you that they are, like Sisyphus, quite resistant to any contemplation of a course of action other than the one that has failed repeatedly. That they should invest their energy in a new method or approach is advice Very Serious
People consider immoral, naive, and reprehensible. They perceive themselves to be heroic realists waging a war of attrition in which small incremental changes are the best we can hope for; whereas someone who recognizes the Democratic Party for the failed institution it is sees them as foolish useful idiots for whom no betrayal, no matter how dark, would cause them to halt their perpetual apologetics. And the very predictability of their submissiveness only encourages further mistreatment from the Party. Go ahead! Hit me one more time and I won't vote for you until 6:55. I wish I could agree with you, Lambert, that Dems have been disabused of the notion that the Party has their backs, but I don't think it's true. And unless we find a primary challenger for 2012 or an independent progressive willing to run, there will be no choice other than apathy and indifference, two emotions the duopoly lives to breed.
I'm not a D...
... so by "we" I didn't mean the Ds.....
I like "apathy and indifference, two emotions the duopoly lives to breed." True, that.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Obama and his alleged stupidity
Sorry for the misunderstanding, though if the "we" already stood outside the Party, I'm not sure why they should have needed more convincing. It's been apparent how utterly useless the Dems are since Clinton's nonsense and Gore's nomination of Holy Joe. The latest refrain about Obama seems to be that he's stupid, but I just don't buy into that. While I never believed that he was playing 11 dimensional chess in order to move the Left's agenda forward, I do think he's figured out how to get re-elected and it involves playing the role of sane mediator to the peanut gallery of crazies who will soon be investigating his ass. He has done everything possible to alienate his base, knowing full well that a challenge from that direction is highly unlikely given the consequences of the Nader campaign. And since the majority of Americans have no faith in the Republicans, they will certainly have grave doubts about putting an undivided government in their hands. I also believe, having fully digested Karp's conspiratorial vision, that the Right will nominate a candidate in 2012 who is truly beholden to the Tea Party and thus unelectable. The Tea Party's purpose is to frighten the Very Serious
People into accepting each incremental step toward fascism, like the proverbial frogs made uncomfortable in the boiling pot, but the duopoly has no intention of letting such potentially independent nuttiness get near the reins of power. They will be put in their place in order that calmer heads, the corporate Dems, may manage the consolidation of profit. Looting will continue unabated. Vacation homes in the Caribbean and elsewhere have already been bought should things turn ugly.
re: Obama's alleged stupidity: Smart is the New Stupid
All through the '08 campaign, my wife just wouldn't shut the fuck up about how "smart" Obama was -- oh, he went to Harvard, he edited the Harvard Law Review, he was a Constitutional Law scholar, he can pronounce "nuclear" properly, he's this, he's that, he's so smart -- but, given the past couple of years' worth of Epic FAIL, it's looking to me like Smart is the New Stupid.
Btw, it's not just oligarchs who are looking at vacation homes outside the country to run off to when things get ugly. My wife retired a couple of years ago -- I've still got six or seven long, torturous years to go myself -- and our Big Dream is a nice, cozy condo in Puerto Vallarta, our adoptive hometown, ASAP; my own personal Big Dream is to kick back with a pitcher of margaritas and a joint at sunset (possession for personal use is legal down there now) in my favorite jazz beach bar, watching the USA collapse on TV in much the same way I watched the USSR collapse -- until I get bored and ask the bartender to put the soccer game back on.
As far as Obummer's metaphorical ass being investigated -- true, the GOP will be looking at the most inconsequential bullshit to investigate said ass about, but, still... anything that'll cause Obummer any amount of butthurt is totally OK by me. I've got the Jiffy-Pop warming up, the beers in the fridge, the bong loaded, and I'm ready for the big show. Bring it, man.
--
"Though I could not caution all, I yet may warn a few:
Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools!"
--grateful dead.
I know I've already riffed on this a bit just recently, but...
...I can't help but think back to The Good Old Clintontime, around the beginning of the '96 Presidential campaign cycle when, after four years of watching the Lefties and Progressives being repeatedly betrayed, shit on, and abused, only to return for more abuse, I couldn't help wondering: just what the hell do the Democrats have to do to them to convince the Lefties to turn their backs and quit wasting their time -- go on TV and give them the finger and tell them to go fuck themselves, right to their faces?
Seems nowadays the Democrats have been doing exactly that -- with Joe Biden's "whiners" crack, then Obama's bitchy interview in Rolling Stone, and now this pompous, arrogant slab of blather... and what's really pathetic is that the Pwogs are still going crawling back to him -- you know, like that classic needy girlfriend who can't bring herself to leave the guy who's treating her like shit.
--
"Though I could not caution all, I yet may warn a few:
Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools!"
--grateful dead.
Not to take the metaphor further than it was meant to be taken
but it strikes me that if one knows of a woman in an abusive relationship she will not end of her own accord, it's time to go to the authorities and use their intervention.
Or, failing that, get together a posse of other men, corner the bastard, and beat the shit out of him.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
Sure, because police
Sure, because police intervention always works out so well for domestic violence victims -- and because vigilantism, especially on behalf of someone who didn't ask for it, doesn't want it, and may well come to physical harm as a result of it? Just peachy keen!
Soldier of kleptocracy
Obama is just a soldier of kleptocracy. Looking at Obama over the last few years, I am reminded of this passage from A Hitchhiker's Guide
I think Barack Obama is amazingly good at his job.
Hugh