Inspired by Atrios’s link to Matt’s analysis of Joe’s blogroll, I thought I’d check out Joe’s stance on Iraq, by going to his issues page (“http://www.joe2006.com/issues.asp”).
But all I got was this. This is a mistake, right?

Look, I know it’s entirely possible that Joe’s server got overwhelmed by an Atrios spike. But shouldn’t Joe’s site have been built with enough capacity to handle that? Ours is. (Hint, hint!)

UPDATE Whoops, looks like Joe’s old site is back now! We’re back to “We’ll be re-launching our full website soon to bring you the latest news and updates from the campaign.”
Shouldn’t a viable campaign be able to keep its website up? Or are they working up to another claim that they got hacked?











Front page
Recent comments
9 min 53 sec ago
18 min 34 sec ago
40 min 36 sec ago
51 min 36 sec ago
55 min 35 sec ago
1 hour 5 min ago
1 hour 12 min ago
1 hour 18 min ago
1 hour 36 min ago
1 hour 45 min ago
1 hour 46 min ago
1 hour 59 min ago
2 hours 5 min ago
2 hours 11 min ago
2 hours 15 min ago
2 hours 18 min ago
2 hours 20 min ago
2 hours 24 min ago
2 hours 33 min ago
2 hours 40 min ago