Joe on the issues

Inspired by Atrios’s link to Matt’s analysis of Joe’s blogroll, I thought I’d check out Joe’s stance on Iraq, by going to his issues page (“http://www.joe2006.com/issues.asp”).

But all I got was this. This is a mistake, right?

joe_issues

Look, I know it’s entirely possible that Joe’s server got overwhelmed by an Atrios spike. But shouldn’t Joe’s site have been built with enough capacity to handle that? Ours is. (Hint, hint!)

joe_issues

UPDATE Whoops, looks like Joe’s old site is back now! We’re back to “We’ll be re-launching our full website soon to bring you the latest news and updates from the campaign.”

Shouldn’t a viable campaign be able to keep its website up? Or are they working up to another claim that they got hacked?