Just to be clear on who the "terrorists" are

One of them has come forward to identify himself and his cadre.

Jeff Pete Sessions, (R-TX), chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, answering a question from a National Journal Hotline editor:

"Insurgency, we understand perhaps a little bit more because of the Taliban. And that is that they went about systematically understanding how to disrupt and change a person's entire processes. And these Taliban -- I'm not trying to say the Republican Party is the Taliban. No, that's not what we're saying. I'm saying an example of how you go about [sic] is to change a person from their messaging to their operations to their frontline message. And we need to understand that insurgency may be required when the other side, the House leadership, does not follow the same commands, which we entered the game with."

"If they do not give us those options or opportunities then we will then become insurgency of a nature to where we do those things that are necessary to making sure the American public knows what we think the correct answer is. So we either work together, or we're going to find a way to get our message out."

When pressed to clarify, Sessions said he was not comparing the House Republican caucus to the Taliban, the Muslim fundamentalist group.

"I simply said one can see that there's a model out there for insurgency," Sessions said before being interrupted by an aide.

And who does Sessions blame for the mediocre "stimulus" bill that made it through the House, the one that was watered down by removing health care provisions and loaded up with tax breaks to sooth the Republicans and BueDogs and still didn't attract a single R vote? That would be the evil Nancy Pelosi, who used her slim majority to pass the bill without letting the Republicans strip out everything but the tax cuts.

The Republicans know who their enemy is - Nancy Pelosi. Do Progressives know who our enemy is? Sessions and the Republicans are threatening to use the tactics of the Taliban to get their way, to destroy any slim hope of stopping the economic disaster we are speeding towards. If that doesn't define them as the enemy, I don't know what would.

Throw the BlueDogs on the pile as well. Steny Hoyer and Evan Bayh and that crowd are perfectly willing to join the Republicans to destroy the middle class and make everyone poor except for their rich buddies.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are not our enemies, and neither is Barack Obama. They aren't perfect, but we have real enemies to deal with; very unwise to take our focus off them.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

They really are horrible

Simply awful. I've always hated Sessions (who's of Alabama, not Texas, BTW), and this just reaffirms my aversion to the guy. If a Dem would have said something like this, the entire weight of the Republican Party and the Village would have come down on them. These aren't the opposition we want to be "bipartisan" with. They are not fit of being a respectable and legitimate opposition as far as I'm concerned. These comments are exactly the reason why we don't have the moral authority to be in (let along beginning ramping up) Afghanistan.

But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...

name corrected

Thought Pete, typed Jeff; never could tell one of these assholes from another.

Oh

Well, that changes my comment about Jeff Sessions ever so slightly, then. Perhaps, you need to change it in your tags, also.

Still, what a nasty bunch of rhetoric from this Pete Sessions. It looks like we have two bad Sessions of Congress, pun intended. Really, talk about "American Taliban".

But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...

It would be humorous

if it weren't so sad. They're determined to make themselves less of a minority.
Will they get the picture when they have just a hundred members in the House? Probably not. They have to truly wipe their membership clean of people like this guy before they can win again the trust of the American public. They're still in that mode:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...

You mean MORE of a minority, Andre.

It's as if they are trying to speed up their complete collapse.

But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...

GOP "stimulus" plan: didn't work then, so try it again

really good analysis of it here (yeah, I link to Kos. Deal with it.)

Greenspan had 28 years to muck with this thing, and EVERY prediction turned out WRONG.
All those "soft landings" were skips like stones on water, headed for the current sinkage.

And about those fiscally responsible GOP Pretzeldents: their Sainted Ronnie didn't live up to his billing on that, either.

Tax rate – upper incomes :

1981 - 69.125%
1982 – 50%
1983 - 50 %
1984 – 50 %

US debt Carter’s final year in office 1980 : 930,210,000,000

US debt Reagan’s first year in office 1981: 1,028,729,000,000

US debt Reagan’s 2nd year in office 1982 : 1,197,073,000,000

US debt Reagan’s 3rd year in office 1983 : 1,410,702,000,000

Lovely color chart at skymachines.This details the facts using numbers.


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18