Just saying

I'm glad somebody took this one on. The Howler on Krugman:

You’ve got to be kidding: Good grief! We scanned his words a second time, to see if we’d read them correctly. We’re fairly sure you know our view: Paul Krugman has been the very best, at the top of the pile, for a very long time now. But golly Ned! Here’s how he started this morning’s column. We had to read it twice:

KRUGMAN (11/7/08): Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008, is a date that will live in fame (the opposite of infamy) forever. If the election of our first African-American president didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you.

If those are the rules of the current game, sign us up for “something wrong with you.”

Moi, aussi. If the Howler's the only one on that side of the playground, I'd still be there. The Howler continues:

Were we stirred Tuesday night? We’re not quite sure. Teary-eyed? No, although moist at times. And we very much admired Obama when he took the hand of Biden’s mother and led her to the front of the stage. It made us think of Bill Clinton, on Inaugural Day, when he stopped to talk to a man who may have been homeless—and addressed him as “sir.” In each case, we were pleased to have a president who had such excellent judgment.

But “proud of our country?” No, not at all; we’ll stand with the early Michelle Obama when it comes to such gauzy constructions. Although we see and hear people, every day, engaging in splendid behavior.

Indeed we do.

With Cordelia, "I cannot heave my heart into my mouth"--and never on demand.

I'm not quite sure what the word is for the category of people who demand of others not that they vote in a certain way, not that they act in a certain way, not that they speak in a certain way, but who would reach into their innermost heart and soul and demand that they feel a certain way. Would "emotional fascist" do? (AA calls this, I believe, taking someone's inventory, and recommends further step four work.) I'm surprised to find Krugman falling into this category, and I trust that the lapse is temporary.

But what would I know? I'm a racist.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

what Meteor Blades said too--

it's all connected--and all has the distinct and toxic odor of "you're either with us, or against us."

We're already seeing the post-election continuance of "it's ok if Obama does it" -- not a good sign.

i've never really understood that saying "Democrats fall in love; Republicans fall in line" -- but now it seems like Democrats are required to fall in love--and in line--all at once.

(The candidates people "fell in love" with in the past were liberals and didn't make it to the general--or at least more liberal than the eventual nominee. No one demanded Clinton love or said "shut up about your issues/problems and love him unquestioningly".)

I'd play with Howler on his side of the playground

I woke up on Wednesday and felt...completely indifferent. I felt Obama got his nomination through unjust and undemocratic means so his election was a validation of those means. On the other side, McCain wasn't someone I wanted either so I wasn't upset that he lost. I now completely understand the apathetic and nonvoters.

There is also the electoral college

Which is one reason I used to not bother with voting.

Now, I just do it because I want to express my opinion, with no thought as to whether it matters or not.

I live in a red state, so it really doesn't matter what I do.

"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot." - Albert Einstein

I'll always remember November 8th, 1960

as the day JFK was elected, but mostly because it's the same day I turned 11.

I don't recall being teary eyed or proud of my country on either account. I thought it was kind of cool (on both accounts), just like I think having a black President is kind of cool, but that in itself won't bring the troops home, fix the economy or provide health care to everyone.

Maybe if we'd do some of that last stuff I'd be more proud of my country.

Bottom line.

...having a black President is kind of cool, but that in itself won’t bring the troops home, fix the economy or provide health care to everyone.

Let's see if he'll be a good black president. That would be even cooler.

Beats a bad white one like Chimpy. :)

It's easier for some of us to compartmentalize

I have to agree with Krugman on the stirring part of it. I was profoundly affected and I'm a teetotaller where Kool-aid is concerned. I can still celebrate with the nation while thinking that Obama is a corrupt politician who doesn't deserve this.
But as for something being wrong with the people who couldn't feel it? The only thing wrong with them is that they were robbed. If Obama had won the nomination fair and square, those people would have been the ones cheering loudest. But Obama won by throwing women and gay people aside.
Yep, we wuz robbed.

Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

Didn't Hillary get more votes in the primary, Goldberry?

You know, just like Al Gore got more votes in 2000 and by most reasonable investigations, won FL and the EV count as well.

Are we re-writing history so soon? It took us several years to get over 2000, it seems like its only taking us several months to get over RBC.

It gets easier and easier to compromise principles after you do it the first time. Looks like its getting easier and easier to accept stolen elections. Might makes right, I guess.

There has been a willful misunderstanding

And I think you are being dishonest.
There is nothing wrong with celebrating a moment in history with people who have waited 400 years for it. The nation *could* have voted for John Mccain despite the souring economy because they didn't like the idea of a black president. You know as well as I do that it couldn't have happened even 20 years ago. The triumph was not Obama's; it was OURS. WE, the people of the United States, decided that color was no longer going to be a barrier. Color was not going to stop the nation from throwing the Republicans out office.
For some of us, that moment was permanently marred by Obama's win. That doesn't mean that I approve of him winning or the way he went about winning or anything he did to win. He is a corrupt, empty suit and we're going to scrutinize his every word and deed. I am not over the way he screwed over Hillary and her supporters and I am not letting him off the hook.
But, yes, I was thrilled for African Americans on Tuesday and I was not going to let my pain ruin their bliss. If there was anything good that came out of this election is was that African Americans finally felt like the country accepted them and that they had reached the mountaintop.
What's not to love about that?
Seriously, I don't get it. Is this such a hard concept to grasp? It doesn't negate the fact that prop 8 passed. It doesn't ignore the rotten and destructive and *ongoing* misogyny. It's just a sincere feeling of joy for people who had waited so long.
What I don't get is why *I* can't feel that without having to justify it to people who should know better.
Does joy not count unless it affects you personally?
Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

"winning"

I didn't mention anything about how you felt about having a Black president, that's your prerogative, and I can sympathize with that view.

I object to saying Obama won the same way I object to saying Bush won in 2000. Both lost, but were given their position because of "teh Roolz". Glossing over that is troubling to me because if we forget what happened in 2000 and during the primary, we are only setting up ourselves to let it happen again.

Well, DUH!

What would you like to do? Go up to every African American in this country and say, "You're enthusiasm and joy is very seriously misplaced. YOU should feel outraged by the way this man cheated his way into "winning" Why aren't you more subdued so that the rest of us who got screwed feel better about the outcome?" I'm sure as hellnot going to harsh someone's mellow because their symbol is a fraud.
I don't think you are going to win this round. That doesn't mean I don't sympathize or believe everything that you do about how badly this whole election process was conducted. I *do* agree with you. And if you do not want to feel happiness for African Americans, that's OK. I understand. But at some time in the near future, maybe not today, maybe not next week, we are going to have to put the bad feelings aside and find the energy to do something to right the wrongs. And verily I say unto you, insisting that we refuse to acknowledge this moment in history is not going to help us move forward. It's much easier to deal with the pain if one just tries to walk a mile in the shoes of an African American this week.
The thrill will wear off of everyone soon enough.
Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

I'm not talking about feelings

I objected to the phrase "Obama won". That's it. You can have your "enthusiasm and joy" argument, its not one I ever tried to have.

I hate it say it...

... but Goldberry's comment reminds me of Kevin Drum on Bob Somerby.

And you know who's really trivializing it? The people who go meta and make it about reactions to Obama -- especially their acceptable ones as opposed to the unacceptable ones of, you know, those others -- instead of Obama himself. What kind of joy is it where you've got to beat other people into line about sharing it?

And who, in the name of sweet Heaven, is "refusing to acknowledge"? I mean, tell you what, write the letter that says "I hereby acknowledge that _____ " in whatever form of words are going to satisfy -- clue stick: no form of words will satisfy -- and I'll sign it and make it the entry page to the site for a month. Jeebus.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

What am I being dishonest about??? What am I not grasping???

And what are you getting at with "Does joy not count unless it affects you personally?"

Perhaps you thought I was being ironic when I praised your comment, but I was not. I appreciated that you could, despite your profound reservations, appreciate the positive aspects of the moment. I felt we were likeminded about that, but perhaps not....

I am frankly dumbfounded at your responses to that praise and to my request that you perhaps cut me some slack for my very specific, and I think well justified, reasons for my vote.

BTW, I have frequently stuck up for people who felt that voting for McCain was a principled thing to do to save or fix the Democrat Party, even if I didn't agree with the reasoning. Where I've parted ways with some PUMAs is when they've chosen to plump up the reputations of McCain and Palin, who are majorly antagonistic to progressive interests, and not from what I've seen particularly honorable people. (Note: I am also critical of people who use low blows against McCain and Palin, such as ageism, sexism, and bogus critiques. That doesn't mean I don't think their politics aren't terribly bad for progressives and that their candidacy wasn't something to oppose vehemently, because I do).

Sorry,

Not thinking of skin color here. Whoopie!! But, the country? Who cares if its a Bi-racial! We have no problems here, just move along.

it's like all columnists/pundits share 1 script--

no matter whether they're right or left or on-air or in print--

Greider in The Nation-- President Obama: This Proud Moment -- http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081117/gr...

"... Obama's success is more shocking. We can see it as a monumental rebuke to tragic history--the ultimate defeat of "white supremacy." ..." --

no. it's not. (and this "proud" reaction is entirely based on skin color, which is the opposite of real progress.)

Agreed, Badger. You summed it up, it should be the actions

not the package that make us proud.

I'm very suspicious of anyone who cries at an election.

I love this job!

I love this job!

election night

I was moved, I was even more moved by the joy which spread across DC. It was a thrilling night, and none of my serious misgivings about Obama prevented me from feeling the same pride that we crossed this particular line.

Someone in my building put a flag outside, it is that kind of good feeling. It won't last, but it is wonderful while it does.

Obama began his concession speech by praising McCain's service. It was classy.

I just saw his press conference. It is going to be very good for the country to see this tremendously poised black man stand in front of the cameras day after day.

It is such a relief to no longer have such an embarassment for a President. I feel joy, real joy.

Not concession,

silly.

Um, I never saw your serious misgivings

Of course, there is plenty of timestamped evidence so I'm sure it'll show up eventually. But, no, you never struck me as a doubter.

Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

You don't see serious misgivings?

Here?
http://www.correntewire.com/when_all_is_...

And in my earlier brief flirtation with endorsing him?
http://www.correntewire.com/vastleft_end...

And when I unendorsed him?
http://www.correntewire.com/vastleft_un_...

Are you kidding? Did I want for reservations about Obama's candidacy?
http://vastleft.blogspot.com/2008/02/i-d...

Did I ever once say I planned to forgive and forget and to stop being boldly shrill wherever and whenever his presidency fails progressives and people who rely on progressive policies?

I do NOT deny your joy!

And I'm happy for you being joyful.

And not that you're doing this, but I just don't think it's right to demand that others feel the same way. It's just not right.

Now, if I'd been out on Broad Street in Philly with all the celebrating people, I might feel as moved as you. But I wasn't.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

Who's demanding it?

If you don't feel it, that's OK. BUT I will say that if you are able to separate the effect from the agent and tap into that feeling, put yourself in the shoes of the guy behind the counter at the bagel store with the giant grin on his face and bliss in his eyes, you *might* feel a wee bit better. There's no harm in trying. You don't have to tell us. You can keep it a secret and remain righteously indignant to us.
Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

Leah demanded it yesterday

No. No, I don't have to feel stirred about this. It shouldn't have happened. I feel, and will continue to feel, bad about this, just as I felt bad in 2000 and 2004.

Amen to that

Leah posted a lengthy speech by MLK yet forgot what was very likely the most appropriate MLK quote of all. The one about not being intimidated by the loudness of one's enemies but by the silence of one's friends. Oh the irony of waving MLK around yesterday...

Count me in for the honest end of the playground

I'd rather sleep at night than sell my soul to the kewl kidz. Somerby's a trooper!

And, goldberry, I'm glad to see the nuance in your view of the stirringosity! Perhaps you can now see my Tuesday decision in a little better light?

I haven't forgiven nor forgotten what happened during the primaries. I just netted out that my vote had more symbolic value to me as a way to condemn Bush and Klansmen to hell than the symbolic or strategic value any of the alternatives offered.

Fuck no

I didn't vote for the guy. I thought he was an inexperienced, Republican pandering, dishonest, corrupt bastard who set the rights and dignity of women and gay people back by 40 years. I wasn't going to reward the DNC or Obama with my vote. I registered a protest vote and went with McCain/Palin, not that it mattered in NJ. Jeez, you gotta have some standards.
That doesn't mean I wasn't overcome with emotion for his AA supporters. That was genuine. But give me a break. The guy completely cheated. There was no way in the world I was going to vote for that.

Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

really?

I didn’t vote for the guy.

such a surprise, I bet that individual who used to post under the screen name of VoteHillary2008 at MyDD didn't vote for Obama either.

I'm not a MyDD regular

Who the heck is VoteHillary2008?

Come together at The Confluence

Come together at The Confluence

What makes this election any more important than others?

If it's because of the color of someone's skin, I disagree. And it shouldn't be because of what that color represents, those changes should be made through actions and achievements not symbolic gestures that have no meaning in and of themselves. This is not a new world because of 11/4/08, it will be through the actions of those leaders.

I love this job!

I love this job!

There is another aspect

and that's the "If not now, when?" question. I realize that also applies to both Clinton and Palin, and applies to many other demographic groups as well.

While I still think performance and ability are the most important considerations, I think "when" and "how" are serious considerations as well. How do we create a pool of black or female politicians qualified to be President? How do we prevent society from stymying that project? How long should blacks or women have to wait for "the one" to come along?

This election is supposed by some to exonerate this nation from the racial sins of its past. In fact Obama's election was an aberration in how our political system operates (just as Hillary's would have been) and it won't be surprising to see subsequent elections contested by mainly old, white guys just as in the past.

We haven't fixed anything with this election - we've just made one exception, and it required extraordinary circumstances - the most unpopular incumbent in history, a weak opponent and a tanking economy - to accomplish.

on demographics--

this was interesting -- but wholly unsurprising and not really news -- every single president up til now has been of British, Irish, or German descent alone -- http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/200...

(i grew up knowing i couldn't ever be president--and still can't)

Think about it this way.

According to this Gallup poll you have a better chance of becoming president as a gay man than I do as an atheist (that is, unless you fall into that last category as well.)

I know what you mean, though. It would be nice to have someone to represent us, wouldn't it? Obama doesn't cut it on either issue.

i think those stats change when

you're more than one of those characteristics at once. And i don't believe those percentages anyway--the whole country voted for Reagan 2x--and he was ancient. And both women in this cycle were treated like dirt--not like 88% would support them.

(i grew up knowing i couldn't be pres bec i'm Jewish--coming out just added another thing that made it even more impossible)

i've seen that poll--

i don't buy it at all--Reagan was ancient, and both women this time were treated like dirt.

i grew up knowing i couldn't be pres bec of my religion--J*wish (lambert has a flag on it)
--coming out just made it even more impossible.

Demand, condemn, insult -- it's all the same in the end

by implication.

Be joyful all you want. But Somerby's got it right that Krugman's out of line. No one's stopping you from being happy, or saying "there's something wrong with you", or that you're pitiable and misguided because of it.

And no one is advocating running around harshing anyone's mellow (talk about strawmen arguments).

One of the worst things about the Obama campaign (yes, there are many to pick from) was the faction that resorted to pesterbotting, bullying and deriding the less enthusiastic into submission. Let's not contribute to the Emotional Blackmail Strategy of Campaign Sucess, hmm? It just opens the door to more elections won by fauxrage and divisiveness.

You don’t know me, son. So let me explain this to you once: If I ever kill you, you’ll be awake, you’ll be facing me, and you’ll be armed.
-Malcolm Reynolds, “Serenity”

Think back to January of 2007 when Obama's name was tossed

around as a potential presidential candidate. What was your first thought? I know mine was, "What are they thinking?" Not for any other reason than he was and is untested and inexperienced. No artifice, no bias. Too green, plain and simple.
Over the subsequent two years these feelings have been labeled by some as biased and racist.

If Sarah Palin had been on the top of the GOP ticket and through some strange twist of fate elected the first female president, would there be cause to celebrate the enormity of this achievement? Would there be tears?

I love this job!

I love this job!