- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
CorrenteCeci n'est pas une caption.
|
|
... keep the heat on!
Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.
No PayPal Account required! Thank you!
Per capita health care spending (2007):
United States: $7290
Switzerland: $4417
France: $3601
United Kingdom: $2992
Average of OECD developed nations: $2964
Italy: $2686
Japan: $2581
-- Bob Somerby
The text of HR676 (Medicare For All) as PDF (30 pages). The FAQ. Compare HR3200 with HR676.
Medicare for All would save $350 billion a year (study in New England Journal of Medicine).
In 2003, a young Illinois state senator named Barack Obama told an AFL-CIO meeting, "I am a proponent of a single-payer universal healthcare program*." -- Bill Moyers.
* Medicare For All.
Marine slang: A clusterfuck was any group of Marines big enough to draw enemy fire, or several Marines close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round. More generically, a clusterfuck was something that was all screwed up, i.e. "That blocking operation was a giant clusterfuck!" Whenever three or more CAP Marines gathered in the open, talking or working on something, somebody was sure to call out "clusterfuck!" and one or more guys would walk away. (Capmarine.com)
Clearly, Bush's war of choice in Iraq is "all screwed up"; that makes it a clusterfuck by definition. However, the term is even more a propos. Tactically, Bush's war of choice in Iraq is a clusterfuck. The analogy to "Marines close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round" is clear. In Vietnam, "in the open" meant being exposed in the rice paddies or jungles. In Iraq, "in the open" means (1) urban warfare where (2) troops (and contractors) must be supplied by trucks which (3) are not armored thereby making them vulnerable to (4) the "incoming rounds" of IEDs placed along the roadside. Nice work, Inerrant Boy. (And the resonance to the words of Matthew 18:19, "wherever two or three are gathered together," is heartbreaking.) NOTE: A tip of the Ol' Corrente Hat to the man in the grey turtleneck for mainstreaming the word "clusterfuck" when applied to Bush's war of choice in Iraq.
Comments
McEwan on Kaine
You Have GOT to Be Kidding Me.
"We" don't need Clinton...or party unity for Dems to win...
Kaine's "so much better" than Clinton: he's so much better known as a national politician, not, and he doesn't care about that yucky women own their own body nonsense that has prevented Democrats from being President for so many years. Prevented a Democrat from being a Republican President, maybe...are both the Obama rulz and the Clinton rulz displayed below? Now I will be quiet and send money to Obama....
From the comments at Tom's The Kaine Mutiny (cited above in the post):
"I don't see what Hillary Clinton brings to the ticket as a veep. She's a lightning rod for controversy, whether or not you think it's her fault, and she'll unite Republicans (and others) like no other. Obama will carry New York well enough without her, and if he doesn't...well, then Superman as vice-president wouldn't help. Despite Hillary's efforts to appear as some kind of white, working-class hero, I suspect that she won her victories in Kentucky and West Virginia not because she was overly popular but because she was the only white Democrat on the ballot. If John Edwards had still been in the running, instead of Hillary Clinton, I'll bet he would have done similarly well.
Posted by: Neil M | July 30, 2008 at 01:59 PM
i think its time for the sore losers to get over it. Hillary is the worst possible choice for a number of reasons. A moderate Democrat from Virginia accomplishes many many strategic objectives. Tim Khaine is a very reasonable choice and rightfully belongs on the short list. This persistent "Hillary or death" attitude is disturbing and borderline psychotic. Get over it.
Posted by: dbg | July 30, 2008 at 02:14 PM"
Tom Watson
Wow, Tom Watson completely misses the problem with Tim Kaine. It has absolutely nothing to do with his lack of starpower. But, then again, that seems all the supporters of the presumptive nominee ever seem to care about, so I guess it's not a surprise that he (Watson) swung and missed.
I propose that Senator Obama simply run as the Democratic nominee, and then co-op John McCain position as the presumptive Republican nominee, and run as the nominee of both parties. Better yet, have them both make an agreement that says they'll administer the government of the United States as co-presidents in the ultimate odd couples match-up. It make for some great television.
Seriously, though, Senator Clinton doesn't need to go anywhere near the vice presidency. You don't row back to the Titanic. Senator Obama needs someone that he can completely dominate and use as a prop, someone with the patience of a saint to put up with that ego of his.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...