Let Your Congressperson Hear you Say It: Medicare for All

Last Tuesday night I emailed Barney Frank(my rep.) after becoming incensed with his recent comments claiming advocating for Medicare for All, which he’s “always supported” was “suicide”. I told Mr. Frank that if he supports Medicare for All it is not enough to sit on the sidelines, you have to advocate for it.  I told him the health finance reform proposal being crafted in Congress is very similar to the failing Massachusetts reforms.  I insisted he do his job and be my voice in Congress by at least pushing for the CBO to analyze Medicare for All.  Pointing out a policy that will cover everyone for less money with better health care is not suicidal, it's sensible.  And, further, the American people are entitled to all the information available about the spectrum of solutions to our health care and health care finance issues. 

Two days later...

I received an unexpected call from the US Capital.  Barney Frank's legislative assistant, Diego Sanchez, was on the line.  The first thing he said to me was, "I just want to hear what you have to say."  I can not explain what a relief it was to finally just having someone on the Hill listening to me.  He did not try to sell me Obama-Care. I told him  when you outright say something isn’t “politically possible” you make it so(FDL's letsgetitdone calls this, "reflexivity"). I told him more than that. I was loaded with facts and figures as to why Obama-Care wouldn’t work but Medicare for All would work.  He agreed with many of my points, and I asked him to ask Barney to direct the CBO to analyze Medicare for All, and we’ll see what Americans think about better health coverage for less. I encourage everyone to write their congresspersons and request the same before the fall vote.  Make yourself heard lest you have any regrets about what could have been.  Sanchez was a delight to talk to. We had quite a long discussion.  He said he would pass on my request to Barney.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Congratulations! Have a bottle of Moxie, on me!

(not that you need it!) Cheers!

This gives me hope for my letters and emails.... better keep my notes at hand when I answer the phone.

---------------
We can't afford not to have single-payer!

Yeah, you inspired me to finally write this.

We got the moxie!!!

Medicare for All is Civil Rights

CBO is performing a cost analysis of Single Payer in August?

I insisted he do his job and be my voice in Congress by at least pushing for the CBO to analyze Medicare for All.

According to this post, Rep. Anthony Weiner said on Ed Schultz's show earlier today 'The CBO is performing a cost analysis of Single Payer over the August recess.' (Sorry, I haven't had a chance to verify that yet but it seemed reasonably plausible to pass on.)

Every apathetic citizen is a silent enlistee in the cause of inverted totalitarianism.—Sidney Wolin

Really???

Are you sure?

That would be FANTASTIC!

Medicare for All is Civil Rights

Weiner's office said his bill, to be voted on in Sept., would be

scored (analyzed?) prior to the vote. Weiner himself said on WNYC it would be scored.

scored/analyzed

Here's single-payer advocate DrSteveB on the difference between "score" and "analyze":

As you know "Scoring" is a narrow and limited process that deals only with bills that are moving through the congressional process and only looks at Federal cost, which would show huge costs requiring tax increase for single payer, and ignore savings for total U.S. and all other stakeholders.
CBO study we desire should have been requested back in January before the congressional process became locked in on particular legislative approaches.

VERY VERY important to use the correct language, we want "analytic study" and we do NOT want just "scoring.' Do NOT use the word scoring. Scoring only looks at the federal budget pice, which of course goes up under single payer. Only "analytic study" can look at the total costs, and costs to different sectors (federal, state, local, individual tax, individual premium, individual out-pocket, employer, etc.).

Every apathetic citizen is a silent enlistee in the cause of inverted totalitarianism.—Sidney Wolin

scored

it's a short time frame, and the powers that be are not going to want health care deform reform derailed by something so logical and simple and affordable as medicare for all.

i'm betting the bill gets scored instead of analyzed. i will, however, continue to hope that it gets a full analysis.

Oh, sorry, you can't verify yet...

No problemo. Thanks for passing on. :)

Medicare for All is Civil Rights

I finally read Letsgetitdone's excellent post

I disagreed with only one thing:

So, finally, it seems that the strategy of the President and the interest groups and individuals to back a public option, and tell everyone that Medicare for All is off the table, has had the unintended effect of weakening the public option itself, so that what we now face are alternatives that are unlikely to be successful in solving the problem.

On what basis do we conclude that effect was unintended?

what if your congressman used to be Newt's chief of staff?

No. Wait. That's Johnny Isaackson, the senator from GA. My congressman is Dr. Phil Gingrey, every bit as bad or worse. I send emails every now and then, and have demonstrated at his office a couple times. You can make some yahoos hear you but you cannot make them listen.

Bruce Dixon
www.blackagendareport.com

I know.

My Congressman is not exactly a rightwinger. Heh.

Medicare for All is Civil Rights

Move N/R

:)

High fives all round for mass's coup de citoyen!

That's great -- and you have the info and points down to make the most of the call you were on. Whoohooooo!

YES!

well done, mass!

funny pictures of cats with captions
see more Lolcats and funny pictures