Look! Over there! Coathangers!
Primary tabs
Submitted by MsExPat on Thu, 10/07/2010 - 9:26am
Yes, my sisters, they're playing that familiar song again...
Democrats in Tight Races Put Focus on Abortion Rights
In the bruising race for a Senate seat here in Colorado, one ad features a Denver obstetrician in her scrubs, saying women will lose control of their bodies if Ken Buck, the Republican nominee, wins. Another, from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, says privacy is at stake with a Buck victory over Senator Michael Bennet, a Democrat.
Would have been nice if our dear champions in the D party had been so concerned about our health and human rights during the uptick to health "reform", no?
Really, how long do they think they can play this broken violin?

- MsExPat's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
If the Republicans win, they might make the Hyde Amendment
permanent!
Oh, wait....
... and they vilify what used to be a base for enthusiasm lack
Dem candidates should each be wearing a big fat H for hypocrisy on their chests!
Yeah, yeah, yeah
Vote Democratic or we'll shoot this puppy! Nevermind the pile of puppy carcasses behind all of the D candidates. . .
I posted on this today, too. I think it's hilarious that Bennet is so desperate he's actually talking to the majority of Democrats now! And trying to bully us into voting for him. It's far, far too late for me to support him. Aside from the fact that he's a dilettante who's made a career working for Daddy's friends, his record on abortion rights is non-existent.
Women--especially non-white women--have been Dem stalwarts all along, and look what we have to show for it. The battle for abortion access is in state houses now, anyway. It sure isn't going to be settled in the U.S. Senate.
Please do remember to share your linky goodness!
..this comment, at the end of Historiann's own post is worth repeating here:
Ya think he would have started on this during the primary...
... but then he knew he had that bought, so why bother until crunch time?
Doesn't he realize that with the crap choice Reps have for governor, that their only meaningful protest vote statewide would be to vote him out of office? Were Dems just that arrogant to believe that since one election was a sweep, all would be?
Quite true!
I got my sample ballot today, and found that there's a Green candidate running for the U.S. Senate seat. Who knew? (Not me, anyway.) I might not have to vote R, but we'll see what the polls look like closer to election day.
I don't want to vote Republican, but I will, in order to rid us of Senator Lockjaw.
"Objectively Worse Under Obama"
As Ian Welsh explains, women's access to abortion has gotten worse under Obama and the Dems than it was under Bush and the GOP. So it takes some nerve (and a complete lack of shame) to argue that women have to vote for them to protect abortion rights.