Mark Steyn: Objectively Pro-STD, anti-Poor People

Ran across this tripe in my perusal of the larger Web, and want some help writing, in outrage, to the various places it's been spewed.

If we have more STD prevention, it will be safer for loose women to go into bars and pick up feckless men, thus stimulating the critical beer and nuts and jukebox industries. To do this, we need trillion-dollar deficits, which our children and grandchildren will have to pay off, but, with sufficient investment in prevention measures, there won't be any children or grandchildren, so there's that problem solved.
The more interviews Speaker Pelosi gives explaining how vital the STD industry is to restarting the U.S. economy, the more I find myself hearing "syphilis" every time she says "stimulus."

WHY does this creep still have a job? On the other hand -- with crap like this filling their columns, newspapers can't die fast enough to improve the world.
Not only does this ... pathetic, lying excuse for a columnist claim that the 1930s measures to revamp and reinvigorate the US economy kicked off a "protectionist" backlash, he lays his case where Reagan did, in cruder language: on women.

Steyn should only go suck a rotten egg.