Via Scholars and Rogues comes this disturbing little blerb that seems almost drugged to calmness in this discussion of what will could happen in the event of an emergency that ’requires’ martial law:
But gun confiscation is exactly what happened during the state of emergency following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, along with forced relocation. U.S. Troops also arrived, something far easier to do now, thanks to last year’s elimination of the 1878 Posse Comitatus act, which had forbid regular U.S. Army troops from policing on American soil.If martial law were enacted here at home, like depicted in the movie “The Siege”, easing public fears and quelling dissent would be critical. And that’s exactly what the ’Clergy Response Team’ helped accomplish in the wake of Katrina.
Dr. Durell Tuberville serves as chaplain for the Shreveport Fire Department and the Caddo Sheriff’s Office. Tuberville said of the clergy team’s mission, “the primary thing that we say to anybody is, ’let’s cooperate and get this thing over with and then we’ll settle the differences once the crisis is over.’”
Such clergy response teams would walk a tight-rope during martial law between the demands of the government on the one side, versus the wishes of the public on the other. “In a lot of cases, these clergy would already be known in the neighborhoods in which they’re helping to diffuse that situation,” assured Sandy Davis. He serves as the director of the Caddo-Bossier Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness.
For the clergy team, one of the biggest tools that they will have in helping calm the public down or to obey the law is the bible itself, specifically Romans 13. Dr. Tuberville elaborated, “because the government’s established by the Lord, you know. And, that’s what we believe in the Christian faith. That’s what’s stated in the scripture.”
Civil rights advocates believe the amount of public cooperation during such a time of unrest may ultimately depend on how long they expect a suspension of rights might last.
Story by Jeff Ferrell
So will I have to paint the blood of a lamb on my front door to get aid, or is that just for Christians? And if I don’t accept the authority of Christians to mediate, does that mean the Christian with whom I’m disagreeing automatically gets what they want?
Creeping and not so creeping, the merging of government policy and Dominionist Christianist
theology is well in progress.









Front page
Ah yes, "crisis"
How con-v-e-e-e-e-e-n-i-e-n-t.
Crisis being yet another synonym for the catastrophe so many of the mouth-breathers are panting for.
Hey, maybe DHS will give ’em tasers to wear under their robes!
We. Are. Going. To. Die. We must restore hope in the world. We must bring forth a new way of living that can sustain the world. Or else it is not just us who will die but everyone. What have we got to lose? Go forth and Fight!—Xan
So, um, what seems to be the problem?
Well.
Let’s see.
First, that bone pipe choker? Yeah, there’s not a cross dangling off the front of that puppy.
So.
Y’all damn well better have a cop or two on the clergy team you send trying to relocate my shiny white yes, because there ain’t no preacher gettin’ me out of my house. Savvy?
confiscating guns
confiscating guns nationwide is a physical impossibility. Even if we called home the entire army, we would not have enough combined military and police forces to effectively pacify and patrol 1/2 the nation. We are just too large, and too scattered. A plan like this works in a city or two, it doesn’t work on a national scale.
Without a real emergency in any major city to destabilize that city and it’s residents, it would be a great deal more difficult to control a city and confiscate anything. Plans like this seem scary, but implementing them would be a logistical nightmare, and I doubt it could be done at a moment of any real emergency. If it could have, they would have in 2001.
Soullite? Bullshit.
Every gun law on the books started as a way of keeping weapons out of the hands of “undesirables,” including but not limited to early New York legislative acts aimed at ensuring Jews couldn’t own or bear arms.
Later, probably after the North won the War Between the States (there is NOTHING Civil about any war, period. Don’t take my word for it. Ask the Apache, the Seminole, the Nez Perce, the Japanese, or the Iraqis), the wording changed so as to include Black and Hispanic people.
But it’s always been aimed at making sure the WASPs stay better armed than the people they’re afraid of.