If you have "no place to go," come here!

Mush from Chuck Schumer on Social Security cuts

Played out in the pages of The Hill. Initial story, this morning:

Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), the Senate Democrats’ chief political strategist, sees a joint budget resolution between the Senate and House as the key to raising another $600 billion in new tax revenues. ...
The joint budget resolution could also call for Medicare reforms and using the chained CPI formula to curb the cost of Social Security benefits. These entitlement reforms combined with tax reform would give Republicans political cover to accept tax increases — or at least more cover than if tax increases were merely packaged as an offset to the sequester.

And now the walk-back paragraph added by the Hill this evening after consultation with Schumer's office:

Schumer’s office does not support the idea of fast-tracking Medicare cuts or the chained-CPI formula for Social Security through a budget resolution, proposals that Republicans would likely support. A Schumer aide noted that a reconciliation package could not make cuts to Social Security. This raises the prospect that 60 votes would be needed to waive a budgetary point-of-order objection raised against any reconciliation package reforming Social Security.

OK, so why the qualification "through a budget resolution"? Why not just issue a flat denial? A question that answers itself, once asked.

No votes yet