<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tribal_conflict_in_america"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/10673/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/10673/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-03-29T05:22:18-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Tribal Conflict in America</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tribal_conflict_in_america" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/tribal_conflict_in_america</id>
    <published>2008-03-29T05:22:18-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-03-29T05:22:18-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>danps</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Meta-meta" />
    <category term="executive power" />
    <category term="society" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>There's been a question rattling around my brain for a while now:  Where have the Second Amendment champions been the last few years?  Those in favor of liberal gun ownership laws usually speak about it in abstract terms, most commonly harmony with the land and guarantees of liberty.  The first argument hasn't been seriously challenged, but what are their thoughts these days about checks against a tyrannical government?  Shouldn't the burgeoning surveillance state be anathema to them?  Isn't this the kind of issue they should be up in arms (har) about?  I would have thought the massive increases in spying and indiscriminate data sweeps would be an unsupportable infringement of their liberty.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
