<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_rules_are_what_you_want_them_to_be_mi_primary_meltdown"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/11517/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/11517/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-05-22T11:31:45-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;The Rules&quot; Are What You Want Them to Be: MI Primary Meltdown</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_rules_are_what_you_want_them_to_be_mi_primary_meltdown" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/the_rules_are_what_you_want_them_to_be_mi_primary_meltdown</id>
    <published>2008-05-22T11:31:45-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-22T11:31:45-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <category term="DNC" />
    <category term="election 2008" />
    <category term="MI primary" />
    <category term="rules are for suckers" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/05/22/why-is-the-dnc-ignoring-mis-citizens-complaints-about-the-cluster/">Marcy splains.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
The Democratic Party's charter requires that the Party:<br />
Establish standards and rules of procedure to afford all members of the Democratic Party full, timely and equal opportunities to participate in decisions concerning the selection of candidates, ... and further, to promote fair campaign practices and the fair adjudication of disputes. (Charter, Article I, Section 4)</p>
<p>Yet both the Democratic National Committee and the Michigan Democratic Party appear to be violating that requirement in their selection of which challenges to the MI Clusterfuck<a href="/glossary/term/9" title="Marine slang: A clusterfuck was any group of Marines big enough to draw enemy fire, or several Marines close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round. More generically, a clusterfuck was something that was all screwed up, i.e. &quot;That blocking operation was a giant clusterfuck!&quot; Whenever three or more CAP Marines gathered in the open, talking or working on something, somebody was sure to call out &quot;clusterfuck!&quot; and one or more guys would walk away.    (Capmarine.com)Clearly, Bush's war of choice in Iraq is &quot;all screwed up&quot;; that makes it a clusterfuck by definition. However, the term is even more a propos.    Tactically, Bush's war of choice in Iraq is a clusterfuck. The analogy to &quot;Marines close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round&quot; is clear. In Vietnam, &quot;in the open&quot; meant being exposed in the rice paddies or jungles. In Iraq, &quot;in the open&quot; means (1) urban warfare where (2) troops (and contractors) must be supplied by trucks which (3)  are not armored thereby making them vulnerable to (4) the &quot;incoming rounds&quot; of IEDs placed along the roadside. Nice work, Inerrant Boy. (And the resonance to the words of Matthew 18:19, &quot;wherever two or three are gathered together,&quot; is heartbreaking.)  Strategically, Iraq is a clusterfuck, too. Look again at the definition: &quot;close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round.&quot; Well, if the &quot;incoming round&quot; is a loose nuke in a shipping container (back)    Bush will have managed to clusterfuck not just 2000 soldiers in Iraq, not just tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, but one or another Blue major ports. (Not that such an object lesson of the unquenchable fire from heaven (back) purging the country of gays, non-Christians, ESLers, and Democrats would make our theocrat rulers anything but joyful.)  Paranoid scenario, you say? Tinfoil hat time? Seriously, does anyone think that a progression from small IEDs, to large IEDs, to missiles fired against ships in Jordan is going to stop there? Bush's war of choice has made Iraq a training ground (back) for these guys, worse than Afghanistan ever was (and OBLâ€”remember him?â€”was blowback from Afghanistan).  That asshole has put all of us in the crosshairs... NOTE: A tip of the Ol' Corrente Hat to the man in the grey turtleneck for mainstreaming the word &quot;clusterfuck&quot; when applied to Bush's war of choice in Iraq. " class="glossary-icon"><img src="/sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/9" title=" &quot;close enough together to be wounded by the same incoming round.&quot; Well, if the &quot;incoming round&quot; is a loose nuke in a shipping container (back)    Bush will have managed to clusterfuck not just 2000 soldiers in Iraq, not just tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, but one or another Blue major ports. (Not that such an object lesson of the unquenchable fire from heaven (back) purging the country of gays, non-Christians, ESLers, and Democrats would make our theocrat rulers anything but joyful.)  Paranoid scenario, you say? Tinfoil hat time? Seriously, does anyone think that a progression from small IEDs, to large IEDs, to missiles fired against ships in Jordan is going to stop there? Bush&#039;s war of choice has made Iraq a training ground (back) for these guys, worse than Afghanistan ever was (and OBLâ€”remember him?â€”was blowback from Afghanistan).  That asshole has put all of us in the crosshairs... NOTE: A tip of the Ol&#039; Corrente Hat to the man in the grey turtleneck for mainstreaming the word &quot;clusterfuck&quot; when applied to Bush&#039;s war of choice in Iraq. " class="glossary-icon"><img src="/sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a> to hear at the May 31 Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting.</p>
<p>At least one group of ordinary Michigan citizens submitted a complaint that appears to fulfill all requirements.<b> Yet the MDP has failed to follow its own rules on how to assist with and respond to that complaint--and it also did not comply with the requirement that it publish the names of those selected in the April 19 district conventions (which triggers a deadline for the submission of complaints). And the DNC will only hear the two state party-led complaints at the May 31 Rules and Bylaw Committee, thereby violating the requirement that "all members" of the party be able "to participate in decisions concerning the selection of candidates."</b></p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
