<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/todays_single_payer_post_the_politics_of_medicare_for_all"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/11901/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/11901/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-15T11:44:30-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Today&#039;s single payer post: the politics of Medicare for all</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/todays_single_payer_post_the_politics_of_medicare_for_all" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/todays_single_payer_post_the_politics_of_medicare_for_all</id>
    <published>2008-06-15T11:44:30-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-15T11:44:30-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DCblogger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="In Sickness and In Health" />
    <category term="HR 676" />
    <category term="medicare" />
    <category term="Natl. Day of Action June 19" />
    <category term="single payer" />
    <category term="Social Security" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.eschatonblog.com/2008_06_08_archive.html#7083293920655933262">Atrios on the subject of Social Security</a></p>
<blockquote><p>One camp includes people like me who think the system is financially sound and it isn't a pressing problem. <strong>More than that, no matter how fiscally sound it's made to be long run, conservatives and the Right won't stop trying to destroy it.</strong> Then there are the group of people who believe the system is something to worry about, at least a bit, and that the way to end the Social Security debate forever and destroy prevailing "IT'S DOOOMED" Beltway conventional wisdom is to put enough more money into the system so that's 100% sound 4evah.</p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
