<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/for_those_waiting_for_the_hillary_shoe_to_drop_on_fisa"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12028/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12028/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-24T15:20:41-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>For those waiting for the Hillary shoe to drop on FISA...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/for_those_waiting_for_the_hillary_shoe_to_drop_on_fisa" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/for_those_waiting_for_the_hillary_shoe_to_drop_on_fisa</id>
    <published>2008-06-24T15:20:41-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-24T15:20:41-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>vastleft</name>
    </author>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>As I wrote in <a href="http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2008/06/clinton-on-fisa.html">comments here</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In case it's somehow not obvious, Hillary's position here is far different from Obama's.</p>
<p>She is -- where many folks are happy to put her -- in a damned-if-she-does, damned-if-she-doesn't situation.</p>
<p>If she takes a strong stand on FISA, she's upstaging the new head of her party (the party she's famously tried to destroy in her monstrous, she-devil, racist, entitled, etc., etc. ways).</p>
<p>If she votes alongside Obama, she's just as bad, and Obama can no longer be criticized for his weaselly position on our Constitutional freedoms.</p>
<p>Obama wanted the ball, and he's got it. It's in his court</p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
