<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/defending_medicare"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12201/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12201/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-07T09:21:28-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Defending Medicare</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/defending_medicare" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/defending_medicare</id>
    <published>2008-07-07T09:21:28-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-07T09:21:28-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DCblogger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Republican Looting" />
    <category term="health insurance" />
    <category term="HR 676" />
    <category term="medicare" />
    <category term="single payer" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_07/014036.php">Kevin Drum</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This would be the same Medicare Advantage that supposedly harnesses the power of the free market to operate more efficiently, yet still requires sizeable subsidies because it costs considerably more per person than good 'ol big government Medicare. What's at issue here is cutting those subsidies so that private Medicare costs only a little bit more than standard Medicare instead of the whole lot more that it costs now.</p>
<p>But that's not in the cards. Forcing private insurers to operate as efficiently as the federal government is apparently asking too much of the GOP's free market acolytes. Better to cut doctors' fees instead.</p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
