<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/through_the_looking_glass"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/1225/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/1225/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2006-01-27T14:07:29-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Through the Looking Glass</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/through_the_looking_glass" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/through_the_looking_glass</id>
    <published>2006-01-27T13:45:54-05:00</published>
    <updated>2006-01-27T14:07:29-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>tresy</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Department of Changing the Subject" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In a <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/27/lauer-russert-abramoff/">parallel universe, far, far away</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>RUSSERT: No, they will say it is a primarily a Democratic scandal because the Madison Guaranty money was siphoned off by Jim McDougal to cover his losses in Whitewater. But Matt, the issue is broad and wide. Republicans also understand that their policies created the Savings and Loan debacle, the Bush family--Jeb, Neil, the former President--is up to its eyeballs in failed S&amp;Ls and so forth, and thatâ€™s why in order to reform all this, it has to be a bipartisan approach. But Republicans get raging mad when you suggest Whitewater is a bipartisan scandal.</p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
