<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/becoming_blog_ecologists_pb2_0_consilience_and_the_third_culture"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12276/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12276/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-11T14:39:22-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Becoming blog ecologists: PB2.0, consilience, and the Third Culture</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/becoming_blog_ecologists_pb2_0_consilience_and_the_third_culture" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/becoming_blog_ecologists_pb2_0_consilience_and_the_third_culture</id>
    <published>2008-07-11T14:38:47-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-11T14:39:22-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BoGardiner</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Heroines and Heroes" />
    <category term="Department of Why Can&#039;t We Do That?" />
    <category term="blog ecology" />
    <category term="consilience" />
    <category term="PB2.0" />
    <category term="Third Culture" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In the <a href="//www.correntewire.com/whither_progressive_blogosphere_2_0#comment-99933“">the latest PB2.0 thread,</a> thinkers/gardeners Lambert and FrenchDoc intrigued me with their parallel of PB1.0 to a monoculture.  Hmmm, let's consider that further: a monoculture is a biological desert which drives out most living things, sustained only by massive inputs of poison and manure, sucking resources from the surrounding environment, vulnerable to destruction from a single external stress, its product nutritionally weak.  </p>
<p>Ecologists <i>know</i> this.  <b>It suggests a framing that could create exciting opportunities for support for PB2.0.</b></p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
