<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obligatory_sex_post"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12497/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12497/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-27T10:43:59-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Obligatory sex post</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obligatory_sex_post" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/obligatory_sex_post</id>
    <published>2008-07-27T10:43:59-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-27T10:43:59-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BoGardiner</name>
    </author>
    <category term="John Edwards" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Obligatory per <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2195869">Jack Shafer at Slate</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Yet, if the press craves consistency, it owes its readers some sort of assessment of Edwards.</a></p>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Corrente readers know all too well that the media doesn't "crave consistency" at all.  We're not press, but we are "media."  And I'd rather resemble a rotting stump than the press.  So here's the obligatory Enquirer/Drudge-sourced sex post. I'm desperately uncomfortable allowing such sources to shape my opinions (thus my exclusion from the OFB<a href="/glossary/term/5086" title="Obama Fan Base" class="glossary-icon"><img src="/sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a><a href="/glossary/term/5086" title="Obama Fan Base" class="glossary-icon"><img src="/sites/all/modules/glossary/glossary.gif" /></a>.)</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
