<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/why_the_heck_wouldnt_the_dems_put_hillarys_name_in_nomination"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12504/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12504/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-27T22:45:08-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Why the heck wouldn&#039;t the Dems put Hillary&#039;s name in nomination?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/why_the_heck_wouldnt_the_dems_put_hillarys_name_in_nomination" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/why_the_heck_wouldnt_the_dems_put_hillarys_name_in_nomination</id>
    <published>2008-07-27T22:17:23-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-27T22:45:08-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lambert</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Jeebus, <a href="http://www.aaiusa.org/washington-watch/1061/w071392">Jesse Jackson's name was placed in nomination</a> when the Dems nominated Dukasis, and he didn't have near as many  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1988">delegates</a> as Hillary does, let alone a majority of the popular vote. So what if it's symbolic? What could be wrong with the symbolism?</p>
<p>So what is <a href="http://www.charlotte.com/breaking_news/story/729443.html">the party Formerly Known as Democratic</a> thinking, if indeed it is thinking?</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
