<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/john_mccain_fighter_ace_destroyed_five_us_planes"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12526/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12526/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-31T22:44:59-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>John McCain: Fighter Ace -- destroyed five US planes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/john_mccain_fighter_ace_destroyed_five_us_planes" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/john_mccain_fighter_ace_destroyed_five_us_planes</id>
    <published>2008-07-28T23:06:08-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-31T22:44:59-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Class Warfare" />
    <category term="Department of When Foil is not Foily" />
    <category term="Department of You&#039;ve GOTTA Be Kidding" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>[Welcome, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/johnmccain.palin">Michael Tomaskey</a> readers!]</p>
<p><img width="175 pixels" src="http://judicial-inc.biz/82jjoh1.jpg"></img><img width="150pixels" src="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_A-4SU_Super_Skyhawk.jpg"></img></p>
<p>
For months now the claims that John Sidney McCain III would be more of the same as the Bush administration have been beaten like the drums of war.<br />
<img width="220px" src="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/GW_BUSH_IN_FLIGHT_SUIT_AS_YOUNG_AIR_FORCE_LT.jpg"></img><img width="240px" src="http://www.tayyareci.com/digerucaklar/turkiye/1951ve2006/images/F-102/f102-10_jpg.jpg"></img></p>
<p>A McCain administration might not be the same as another Bush term, though -- it might be worse, especially if their respective flying records are anything to go by.</p>
<p>Don't misunderstand. This is not to disrespect McCain or denigrate his service. It's to suggest, strongly, that in light of what a younger and arguably less (flight-related) accident-prone Republican President has achieved in the past two terms, accepting McCain as just like Bush might seriously understate</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
