<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obama_has_no_excuse_to_bypass_the_historic_vp_choice_hillary_clinton"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12615/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12615/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-03T23:31:52-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama Has No Excuse to Bypass the Historic VP Choice: Hillary Clinton</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obama_has_no_excuse_to_bypass_the_historic_vp_choice_hillary_clinton" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/obama_has_no_excuse_to_bypass_the_historic_vp_choice_hillary_clinton</id>
    <published>2008-08-03T23:31:27-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-03T23:31:52-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BoGardiner</name>
    </author>
    <category term="hillary clinton" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <category term="VP" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>None.</p>
<p>Similarly, if Clinton had won by a narrow margin, she would have had no excuse to bypass a historic candidate like Obama.  </p>
<p>Obama should ask Hillary Rodham Clinton as his top pick for VP.  The reasons are so legion, so obvious, there’s no need to enumerate them further.  They can be summarized as uniting, winning, and governing, with the justice of recognizing the first major woman Presidential candidate in U.S. history, highly qualified and supported by half of Democrats.  </p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12262.html">Politico this evening</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
