<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Corrente</title>
  <subtitle>Boldly shrill ...</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/talk_to_clinton_about_the_convention"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/node/12662/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/node/12662/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-06T23:00:35-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Talk to Clinton about the Convention</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/talk_to_clinton_about_the_convention" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/talk_to_clinton_about_the_convention</id>
    <published>2008-08-06T23:00:35-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T23:00:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Truth Partisan</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Clinton Obama convention press" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>This <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5528104">explains the "leaks"</a> pretty well:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Sources close to both Obama and Clinton told ABC News that the New York senator is highly unlikely to allow her name to be formally submitted for a roll-call vote on the convention floor. The Obama campaign wants to avoid such a vote, since it would underscore the party's splits and remind voters of the divisive primary campaign between the two Democrats.</p>
<p>The refusal to publicly announce her intentions is widely seen as a bargaining chip Clinton is holding on to as party officials negotiate logistics regarding her convention speech and other activities, according to several Democrats who are closely involved in the matter.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
