Sure, Cece in Pravda, but since it's essentially a press release for the administration with a few links thrown in, I'll go with it:
President Obama, strategizing yesterday with congressional leaders about health-care reform, complained that liberal advocacy groups ought to drop their attacks on Democratic lawmakers and devote their energy to promoting passage of comprehensive legislation.
In a pre-holiday call with half a dozen top House and Senate Democrats, Obama expressed his concern over advertisements and online campaigns targeting moderate Democrats, whom they criticize for not being fully devoted to "true" health-care reform.
I like true in quotes. All Obama and the career liberals are arguing about is how best to guarantee the health insurance companies a market forever. Neither side is advocating "true" reform.
"We shouldn't be focusing resources on each other," Obama opined in the call, according to three sources who participated in or listened to the conversation. "We ought to be focused on winning this debate."
Er, no. That's a rhetorical issue. "Winning the debate" is pure Versailles
insiderism, like "winning the week." We ought to be focused on winning the best health care policy for the American people. Right?
Specifically, Obama said he is hoping left-leaning organizations that worked on his behalf in the presidential campaign will now rally support for "advancing legislation" that fulfills his goal of expanding coverage, controlling rising costs and modernizing the health system.
Oh, "expanding" coverage? Not universal coverage? Hmm. Granted, Cece's stenography could be off, but still....
In recent weeks, liberal bloggers and grass-roots groups such as MoveOn.org, Democracy for America, Service Employees International Union and Progressive Change Campaign Committee have targeted Democratic Sens. Ben Nelson (Neb.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Arlen Specter (Pa.), Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.).
I'm happy that anybody pokes a sharp stick in the eye of any of these guys, but let's not confuse that enjoyable activity with supporting good policy, eh?
Obama was joined on the call with lawmakers by White House health czar Nancy-Ann DeParle, though he led most of the conversation. DeParle and White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina have been in intense negotiations with hospital representatives in the hope of extracting guaranteed [How?????] spending reductions from the industry.
Ah yes, Nancy-Ann DeParle. We know all about her. The White House censored her answer on single payer from its own blog. Open! Transparent!
* * *
Imagine if all these "progressives" with big megaphones -- unlike us "little single payer advocates" -- had been advocating for single payer two years or even a year ago. (Digby, at least, is honest enough to admit not doing so was a mistake; see "I do agree".) We might be advocating for a real solution, like single payer, versus a bullshit kludge, like so-called "public option", instead of being forced to choose between (a) shit, (b) shittier shit, and (c) delayed gratification to let populist pressure build so we don't have to eat shit at all. (Insiders and wannabe insiders whose focus is on "politics" and the mid-terms tend not to like that last option.)
Bottom line is that "progressives," by advocating for a too-little and too-late so-called "public option" (and using it as a fundraising vehicle) have ended up nailing the Overton Window
firmly shut at a position where it's now unclear that anybody will actually gain from "health care reform" other than the insurance companies.
Well done, all.
NOTE Of course, this could all be kabuki: Obama saves the health insurance companies from the right, career liberals save the health insurance companies from somewhat less right -- and prove they're "effective" at throwing all the nasty hippie "little single payer advocates" under the bus where they belong. Yay!
NOTE Hat tip for the link to ElizabethF.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page
Comments
Will He Follow Up?
That's my question. Of course he's going to say to the Congress people that he dislikes the pressure from the left on them. That's politics. The question I have is whether or not he means it. Now, based on what I've seen so far, I believe he probably does, but I want to see if he actually follows up his words with actions. He so rarely does.
* NOTE - the politics is not only telling this to Congress, but leaking it so the press can see that he isn't aligning himself with those DFHs
, giving Versailles
its center-gasm.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
When it comes to throwing the left under the bus...
... Obama has always followed through.
Which is actually a pretty good litmus test for whether this is all kabuki, eh?
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
I fear we ain't seen nothin yet
concerning Obama's penchant for throwing the left under the bus.
During the primaries Obama said he disliked baby boomers whining about their entitlements and talked about the solvency of Social Security.
Won him support among clueless youth and verified his belief in his Milton Friedman Memorial economics team.
We should all remember this: 'only Nixon can go to China'
The next great looting: Social Security
That is my great fear.
Only Nixon Could Go To China
Exactly why I think Obama is so dangerous to any potential leftward shift as well as the common good. He can do much more damage as a faux liberal/progressive precisely because he can simultaneously be the second coming of Reagan using Next Generation triangulation all the while damaging what's left of leftward political credibility. Your supposed friends/allies can hurt you much more than people known to oppose everything you stand for.
The question of how to make Obama do the right thing is crazy-making to me. I don't have The Answer, but I think it has something to do with damaging his brand since that's all he and his movement really are - nothing but buying brand Obama.
A friend who used to run an advertisting agency once told me upon learning details of my non-compliant consumerism, that I was a 'complete and utter marketing failure'. Maybe that's why I never bought Brand Obama, but not being in the advertising biz, I don't know exactly how you go about doing damage to a brand. I suspect it has something to do with pointing out how that soap that's supposed to make you taller, not only makes no one taller, but actually gives most people a seeping rash.
Nowhere is this more possible than on healthcare. There's actual footage of him saying he supports single-payer, but first we have to take back the WH, House and Senate. This is a rare statement from him where he sets up the entry criteria to meet an actual tangible goal. It should be used on him many times daily until he does the right thing on single payer. At the same time, it probably wouldn't hurt anything if single payer advocates started returning fire on the pysch-out defeatism front. Whenever we hear that single-payer is off the table and politically unfeasible, it should be pointed out that it's the right thing to do for the common good, the economy, voters, and besides, you and the health insurance parasites can't stop it. And oh yeah, you used to support it before you were against it. Realizing that only Nixon could go to China, I think it's time to stop being nice and think about how to damage the brand that can do untold damage to us all.
Why...it's almost as if Obama's afraid
that the little members of Congress might start listening to the chorus of calls for Health CARE For All and might be lured away from the planned Insurance For All initiative.
Or maybe he's worried that the longer this gets dragged out by little single payer advocates and little health CARE advocates, the more obvious it will be that Obama's got his eye on the Health Insurance Salesman of the Millennium award.
And he wants that award, bad.
Please!
He used you, lied to you, ignores you, blames you (didn't save enough, bought homes you couldn't afford, spend to much on health care and want too many diagnostic tests) and calls you names (little single payers" for example) and he lectures you night and day. Now he is forming a coup against you:
This is a guy who is talking down to you every time he opens his mouth.
Radical acceptance: He does not like you progressives. He really, really doesn't.
(I'm a liberal :-); I know what he thinks of us)
Obama just knocked down "11-D chess" apologists
What delusion will they hide behind now? Before, the assumption was that Obama secretly wanted us to push him on the left (think: good cop, bad cop). Now, that Obama himself has said, "Sit the fuck down," I wonder if that will finally be what it takes for them to admit that they've been had.* Not until they see Obama for who he truly is (and has been since his rise to national politics), a Reagan fan boy, will we have a chance at checking him in time before it's too late. We're way too small in number without them. We need to frame Obama as the corporate conservative he is or else his failures will be seen as the failures of liberalism.
I'm not hopeful that we'll get anything fundamentally similar to single payer, but we've got to try. I'd rather have this wretched bill fail now than pass supposed "reform" only to FAIL later. By then it will be too late to pass any actual reform (and that's probably the point).
So, "progressives," please wake the fuck up and help us.
*They're still clinging to, "Well, it's not like Clinton would have been any better" which really is an admission of error since the whole point of Obama running was judgment and change, which was to compensate for Clinton's "experience" factor.
The progressives' "wait 'til he does something"
was not only creepy at the time, it has turned out to be devastating to non-"creative class" Whole Foods citizens.
Nancy-Ann appears to know rather well BHIP* malfeasance --
Per this MSNBC report:
Mabe what the man needs is a hint
of talk about a third party, no? Oh, are we afraid this might push him even further to the right????? Well, we're damned if we do and damned if we don't, but it might just take a hint on our part, but it is always good to remember that if we make a threat, we best be ready to deliver. As for me, a life long liberal, who did not vote for him in the general, I have no place to go!
it is a good sign
the fact that Obama mentioned it is a sign the campaign is having its effect. Right now the best I hope for is some language in the legislation protecting the state's rights to have their own single payer plan.
"make me do it"
Obama never had any intention of having his feet held to any fire. He ran a beautifully orchestrated campaign and used the people he least admired to get him where he wanted to be and now he is finally making "changes". When I tried to enlighten people about his politics and intentions they said "Oh, you are so cynical, do not destroy my hope" Where is your hope now???? Mine lies with the few vocal liberals that are left to keep "speaking truth to power". We are being "okeydoked" with this proposed health care initiative which will do nothing but line the Pharma pockets. Happy Fourth of July America, wake up!
wrensis
Disturb the comfortable and comfort the distrubed
But is it "make me do it,"
or is it really, "you can't make me?"
It's just ridiculous that with over 70% of Americans in support of a single-payer solution we should have to drag or push the president and the Congress to support it, too.
There is no way these people do not know what Americans want, and I am weary of Obama repeating the same old tired reasons why single-payer isn't the answer; increasingly, he seems to be saying, "you can't make me."
Seems like a good time to make use of Obama's favorite rallying cry: Yes, we can.
Susie at Crooks and Liars
Susie has a brilliant post at Crooks and Liars.
Day by day
In every way I like Obama less and less.
VasLeft had the right word
"Squandered."
Knew it was coming with the inaugural speech -- no "fear itself" there, just the promise of more pain. Not for the banksters, of course -- Just for people who are using too much medical care, eating too much, not going part-time to help others out, and so forth...
All entirely "for thee and not for me."
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi