Obama doesn't like Rap star attacking Bush and McSame

Ludacris 'Should Be Ashamed' Of Lyrics Bashing Bush And McCain, Says Barack Obama Rep

But those aren't the lyrics that have displeased the Obama team. On the song, 'Cris expresses other thoughts on the political climate, calling Hillary Clinton "irrelevant" and insinuating that Jesse Jackson's apology to Obama for some recent crude statements wasn't genuine. Like many of his peers, he also complains about President George W. Bush's "poor" job while in office. "McCain don't belong in any chair unless he's paralyzed/ Yeah I said it, 'cause Bush is mentally handicapped," Luda raps.

Calling Hillary Clinton irrelevant may not be very nice or clueful, but it is not in the same class as talking about her periodically getting down or the claws coming out.

Something about a pot and a kettle I think.

Comments

Ludafool

Quickly: I love how the headline at Misogyny TV is about the ad attacking Bush and McCain, ignoring the slur against HRC.

Luda called her a "bitch" (A slur is a slur no matter how popular it is). I think that goes beyond not being "nice." But yes, I agree, it's a bit odd for a man who exploited heinous bigotry and even dabbled in some ignorance himself to all of a sudden (pretend to) condemn it. And anyone who has ever heard Ludacris before and certainly one who considers him one of their "favorite" rappers would know his history and defense of misogyny (see: Oprah vs. Ludacris). So it's total bullshit for Obama to say he's against Luda's hate and other nonsense when he enjoys his "talent."

Obama favoring the likes of Luda and Eminem ("Lose Yourself" doesn't cancel out a career built solely on ultra-violent hate) is fucked up, especially when there's Lupe Fiasco, a true talent who doesn't revel in misogyny but condemns it. The dude is even from Chicago. Check him out:

And because I love his albums so much, here's one more:

oops

I thought he just called her irrelevant, not bitch.

Here's the Luda link

Luda and his "inartful" commentary (The slur at 42 seconds in is bleeped out but you can tell what it is).

Both Ways Barry

"That's not the same Ludicris song I just listened to in my iPod".

It's old news

That is why you missed it, DCB. It is irrelevant and totally not newsworthy that people publicly call Clinton a bitch.

Here are a few of the lyrics, via Riverdaughter

I’m back on it like I just signed my record deal
yeah the best is here, the Bentley Coup paint is dripping wet, it got sex appeal
never should have hated
you never should’ve doubted him
with a slot in the president’s iPod Obama shattered ‘em
Said I handled his biz and I’m one of his favorite rappers
Well give Luda a special pardon if I’m ever in the slammer
Better yet put him in office, make me your vice president
Hillary hated on you, so that b**** is irrelevant
Jesse talking slick and apologizing for what?
if you said it then you meant it how you want it have a gut!
and all you other politicians trying to hate on my man,
watch us win a majority vote in every state on my man

At least Obama acknowledged that the lyrics were offensive to Clinton, according to your linked story, so I guess we're making progress.

Bill Clinton for First Dude!!!

This vignette is one more sad act in this election tragedy.

I certainly don't feel sorry for HRC but my heart goes out to our nation and its children. It appears all hope is lost for civility, accountability, responsiblity and any other ity that's been dashed by Obama's campaign.

I love this job!

No ballot, no floor vote for HRC is what's being spewed by

Bernstein over at CNN. Not able to find the comment myself...still looking.

This is sad news indeed, my friends. It would have been the right thing to do. A floor vote would have given the DNC some shred of credibility...oh, there's another ity squashed by Dean & Co.

I don't want to play anymore. I want to go home.

I love this job!

Except it's not news, yet

Not on CNN, not on news.google, not on the usual suspects. What show were you listening to, when you heard this, elixir?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

I heard it last night on CNN

and this morning on Morning Joe (I usually don't watch but I stayed on when they aired the entire lyrics, which is what I was interested in, I didn't listen to the discussion. There is only so much pain I will self-inflict).

Nothing today on Google, and...

obviously, I'd really like to know. Reminds me of that old National Lampoon gag about Fred Kissmiass.

"What's your last name?"

And so it would go....

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

i heard it too--they gave her Keynote, so they think that's

honor enough--and that it's "women's night" since it's the anniversary of women getting the vote or something like that.

stumbled across it

clearly I spend too much time online

Lady's Night

I wouldn't put above the DNC to label that night as "DNC Lady's Night".

Oh, isn't that so magnanimous, letting the little lady speak at the big convention. Better yet, she can tell her supporters on the largest stage, yet, to shut up and give Obama money!

Ponies, Dude! Everyone's Getting Ponies! You get a pony, and you get a pony...Obama's Favorite Things!

a good example of truthiness--

the campaign are the people spreading it and pushing it for their own reasons, and not outside people or the singer, etc-- and they are not outraged or upset by this, and are in fact propagating those lyrics all over the media -- by their own actions.

I haven't seen one article that said "Ludacris releases song: Obama camp denounces" or any rightwing anger over it or anything like that before the campaign fed this to the media.

Many Americans would never ever have heard this song, or of this song at all--especially older Americans--but now they've received the message that Obama's taking a moral stance against it, and they've heard/read the exact insults too. The McCain is old/feeble/cranky stuff is exactly what they themselves are pushing, and the Hillary hate is just more redmeat for Obama's base too.

one link here--

http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2008/...

"Chris Matthews’ pal, Gloria Boerger might have revealed the latest in the Obama and the DNC’s bizarre attempt at drawing in the Hillary Clinton voters.

View it here: http://video.thechrismatthewsshow.com/pl...

“Remember Hillary Clinton?” she chirps with a slight sneer when asked “for something I don’t know,” by Chris Matthews. And what does Chris not know? — That IF Hillary’s name is placed in nomination it will happen in the morning as far as possible from prime time and the bulk of American television viewers. ..."

and the transcript-- http://www.thechrismatthewsshow.com/html...

"... MATTHEWS: Welcome back.

Gloria, TELL ME SOMETHING I DON'T KNOW.

Ms. BORGER: Remember Hillary Clinton?

MATTHEWS: Sure do.

Ms. BORGER: There are still negotiations going on between the Clinton folks
and the Obama folks about the convention, still not resolved about a roll call
vote, but if there is a roll call vote for Hillary Clinton, watch it to occur
in the morning.

MATTHEWS: OK.

Ms. BORGER: Out of prime time when it won't be as big a deal.

MATTHEWS: But if there's a roll call--quickly--and Hillary Clinton comes in,
it's like a photo finish and she just loses to him, right? What would be the
message to the country?

Ms. BORGER: `I'll be back.'

MATTHEWS: Yeah. And in fact, `I'm still here,' I think, maybe. ..."

Great, thanks

We read so much crap is hard to keep track. Still, this story hasn't panned out, yet, at least not in any other media outlets. Though one wonders whether the keynote wasn't a quid pro quo.

God, Chris Matthews. Jeebus, I'm reading that transcript and I want to take a shower. What a tool. I wonder how his leg is?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

here. (sigh)

McCain takes on Obama's race boating...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/us/pol...

“Barack Obama has played the race card, and he played it from the bottom of the deck,” Mr. McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis, charged in a statement with which Mr. McCain later said he agreed. “It’s divisive, negative, shameful and wrong.”....“The McCain campaign was compelled to respond to this outrageous attack because we will not allow John McCain to be smeared by Senator Obama as a racist for offering legitimate criticism,” he said. “We have waited for months with a sick feeling knowing this moment would come because we watched it incur with President Clinton. Say whatever you want about President Clinton, his record on this issue is above reproach.”

and Howard Wolfson from the clinton camp get in his licks...

Howard Wolfson, who was the communications director of the Clinton campaign, said, “The McCain campaign has obviously been watching our primary very closely and recognized how damaging it had been to be tagged with the charge of race baiting.”

The whole thing makes me want to pound my head on the desk

Because, in the primary, the charge McCain is making now was true, and it worked out very well for Obama in the primaries.

So, now we have before us the happy sight of a Republican actually telling the truth, which is pretty hard to handle in itself, and doing it in a way that hurts a Democrat. And not a Republican like Bruce Fein, either.

If anybody sees a post—or wants to write one themselves—that manages to take down McCain on this while not succumbing to historical amnesia on the primary, I'd be very glad to see it. Anyone call their shot? Because I suppose we should have seen it coming.

Strange bedfellows, indeed.

Oh, and what the McCain camp will never charge Obama with? Misogyny. I betcha. And why, one wonders.

Aaaaaugh!

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

don't forget that America remembers 2000,

when it was him who was the target of the nasty racist attacks--he earned sympathy then, and a reputation for not being just another racist Republican but a victim of them just like us Dems always are.

Repeatedly and pre-emptively calling everyone who even examines your qualifications racists is such an enormous mistake on all levels--it alienates voters and wants to force them to vote Obama to prove a negative--that they're not racist. A losing strategy.

Apparently, that's all he's got going for him--it's certainly not experience or issues or policies.

And it's also "tell me something i don't know" too--all voters know that the Republicans always use race against every Democrat.

[pounds forehead on desk]

Ah yes. South Carolina... The push polls, the black love child...

Maybe my problem is that I take this too seriously?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Misogyny Joins Race Boating In Coming Back to Bite Obama

In addition to the underlying racism, the ad - by comparing Obama to Spears and Hilton - is basically calling him a girl and a "trashy" one at that. How's Obama supposed to respond to that? Denounce misogyny used against him, but not against Clinton? He's already doing less well than Kerry among white women in Ohio and Florida.

But it's also true that McCain is only using what's in the culture. You could argue that if you want to suggest someone is a throw-away celebrity or a trashy one, you are pretty much limited to young women. "Progressive" Keith Olbermann doesn't run videos mocking Colin Farrell as a slut for all those young "progressive" male viewers of his, does he?

And you'll be happy to know that the WSJ via James Taranto defends McCain from racism charges because:

First of all, the notion that the McCain ad plays to stereotypes of black men as sexual predators is far-fetched. The invidious old stereotype has to do with black men as a threat to white feminine innocence, and it is hard to imagine two less innocent symbols than Hilton and Spears.

See, no racism here because nobody would ever worry about a black man or any other man preying on a couple of sluts like Spears and Hilton. Oh, I'm sorry, their not sluts, they're just "oversexed and/or promiscuous young white women" according to "progressive" Josh Marshall.

they always feminize all Democratic men--

always.

Maureen Dowd has already been on that for months now. Obambi, etc.

And Obama and his family have simply cemented it too--no sweets, no diner food, talking about watching his waistline, etc....

so it's incredibly weird to see it as accusing him of being a Harold Ford "Playboy" simply because there are 2 young blonds visible for 5 seconds in an ad.

Obama supporters are

trying to tie McCain's ad to that Harold Ford ad, but this is the real GOP attack line--he's not a regular guy, he's elitist, he won't even eat normal snacks, etc...

"...These days he stays away from junk food and instead snacks on MET-Rx chocolate roasted-peanut protein bars and drinks Black Forest Berry Honest Tea, a healthy organic brew. (Sen. McCain is said to have a weakness for Butterfinger candy bars, jelly beans, and coffee and doughnuts from Dunkin' Donuts.)

On a campaign stop in May at Lew's Dari-Freeze in Milwaukie, Ore., Sen. Obama's wife, Michelle, and their two daughters ate ice-cream sundaes and onion rings, while Sen. Obama grinned for the cameras and swirled a spoon around in his quickly melting ice-cream concoction, taking only a few nibbles.

During a July family appearance on "Access Hollywood," Sen. Obama's 7-year-old daughter, Sasha, revealed that her dad doesn't like ice cream or sweets. "Everybody should like ice cream," she said.

..." -- http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12175533...

Bambi

they always feminize all Democratic men--always. Maureen Dowd has already been on that for months now. Obambi, etc.

Bambi was male.

oh, you're right--

i never think of Bambi as a boy tho at all--do most people?

And About that Race Boating

Read the Politico article (I know, I know, it's Politico, but it's a good indication, IMO, of what the Village is thinking).

Oh, and McCain's pushback appears to be working. According to the article, the Obama campaign already has its WORM:

But the aftermath of this campaign flashpoint — which began with a McCain ad using Paris Hilton and Britney Spears to paint Obama as a preening rock star — indicated points were scored for the Republican side.

Obama's campaign quickly put out a statement Thursday retracting the candidate's suggestion that McCain had improperly used race, and, while on a conference call with reporters, campaign manager David Plouffe declined repeatedly to revisit any aspect of the question of race.

"We weren't suggesting in any way he was using race as an issue," Plouffe said of McCain, though he didn't explain how Obama’s words could be taken any other way. He also declined to engage speculation that McCain was responding so forcefully to highlight Obama's race.

[pounds forehead on desk]

[sound of pounding forehead on desk]

Hard to unscorch earth....

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

You're Going to Need a Bigger Bottle of Aspirin, lambert

Did you read the entire Politico article? Because the earth is very scorched, indeed (emphasis mine):

Obama’s aim, in the view of the McCain camp: "to delegitimize any line of attack against him," said McCain aide Steve Schmidt. He said he saw that potential trap being sprung when Obama predicted in Missouri Wednesday that the GOP nominee would attack the Democrat because he "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."

"I don't [care] whether it helps or hurts us," Schmidt said. "A lie unresponded to becomes the truth."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said McCain's campaign was "misinterpreting" both the "tenor and the meaning" of Obama's words.

"I think they should probably be a little less paranoid about parsing every word we say and a little more focused on actually addressing the challenges that Americans expect the president of the United States to take on," he said.

To campaign watchers, in fact, Obama's warning Wednesday seemed less a direct attack on McCain than as part of a running effort to cast all attacks on Obama in the worst possible light: as products of ignorance at best and bigotry at worst.

Well, what would I know...

I'm a racist.

[pounds forehead on desk. Again.]

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Dept. of "NOW they get it"

To campaign watchers, in fact, Obama’s warning Wednesday seemed less a direct attack on McCain than as part of a running effort to cast all attacks on Obama in the worst possible light: as products of ignorance at best and bigotry at worst.

take down?

If anybody sees a post—or wants to write one themselves—that manages to take down McCain on this while not succumbing to historical amnesia on the primary, I’d be very glad to see it.

The thing is, I'm not sure that McCain should be 'taken down' on this. McCain is perfectly within his rights to talk about the Obama campaign's race-boating; my criteria is "would McCain have made this commercial if Obama was white?", and if the answer is 'yes' then the McCain campaign is off the hook despite the fact that Obama's race will provide additional subtextual resonance to the point being made by the ad.

yup-McCain is not the guilty party here

and Obama needs to learn that he can't use the same "everything the opponent says--or will say--is racist" dirty and damaging game again, like he did against the Clintons.

I see the racism in the ad

Yes the fear of miscegenation is still alive and well in America, and regardless of the white women depicted in the ad, that point remains valid.

But how effective is it? IMO, not very. Liberals, over sensitized to the sounds and sights of racism, will see it and be outraged about it. But the people who would be riled by the threat of a black man against the white women, aren't voting for Obama anyway, so I don't see how this ad is very effective.

Don't forget either, that part of how the GOP has successfully race boated Dems in the past, is portraying the racist dog whistle in such a way, that it has a non-racist explanation.

The Ford ad, for example. The ad was allegedly about his Playboy ways, but it was really about the racism. Or Willie Horton. That was allegedly about the poor judgement of Dukakis, but it was really about the racism. This ad is allegedly about the cult of celebrity, but it's really about the racism.

Do I have any sympathy for Obama though? Hell no. The end result of his race boating campaign was obvious for anyone with half a brain, that charges of racism against the truly egregious attacks by the Repugs, would be ignored in typical "Boy Who Cried Wolf" fashion, and that the resentment over the Clintons treatment during the primaries would be played upon as well.

Another reason why this man should not be our president, is that he isn't very forward looking, he doesn't think through the future consequences of his actions, only about the immedeate benefit.

Bill Clinton for First Dude!!!

Obama compared himself to Paris back in 04 tho--

was he being racist too?

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/07/... -- "... Obama himself mentioned her during his routine before the winter Gridiron dinner in 2004, just after he was elected to the Senate. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) used her name to make a point about Scooter Libby getting clemency from President Bush in July, 2007.

"Even Paris Hilton had to go to jail. No one in this Administration should be above the law," Durbin said.

In 2004 Obama riffed about his celebrity at the Gridiron, saying everything changed for him after he keynoted the Democratic convention earlier that year.

"It's like I was shot out of a cannon. I am so overexposed, I make Paris Hilton look like a recluse. "After all the attention -- People magazine, GQ, Vanity Fair, Letterman -- I figure there's nowhere to go from here but down. So tonight, I announce my retirement from the United States Senate. I had a good run." ..."

not every matching of a white woman with a black guy is racist or meant to imply that the guy is preying on white women or whatever it's supposed to be--the Ford ad clearly was, but Ford himself was either married to a white woman or was known to party with them, too.

Would it be racist to compare Obama to black celebrities?

What if someone compared him to Jesse Jackson?

------------------------------------------------
“But hysteria is all the rage these days, I guess” - gqm

Of course not, myiq

That's where the miscegenation comes in. They could have easily used the visuals surrounding celebrities such as Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan or Janet Jackson, to make the exact claims the ad makes, but they chose not to.

Why?

Because there are still plenty of ignorant people who freak out over the thought of a black man and a white woman.

I think the ad is dumb, because people who are freaked out about miscegenation, aren't voting for Obama. But the ad is effective, because it allowed the GOP to unveil their "Boy who cried race" media strategy. Which is working.

And Obama has already been compared to Jesse Jackson, and wasn't happy about it(remember South Carolina?). Jackson doesn't necessary qualify as a celebrity, IMO. And depending on the context, it could be offensive, to treat all black politicians as if they are interchangeable, like putting a woman on the VP slot to quiet Clinton supporters, as if all women are interchangeable, was offensive.

Many PUMA's are wrong on this, and I think they are allowing their dislike of Obama blind them to the blatant racism in the ad.

And remember, the purpose of the racism in the ad, isn't meant to turn voters away from Obama, as it was in the Horton or Ford ads. This one was designed to elicit a response from the Obama campaign, allowing the GOP to pounce on him for screaming racism at every opportunity.

Bill Clinton for First Dude!!!

Pardon me if you've covered this...

But are Tiger Woods, Janet Jackson, or Michael Jordan known for being famous for no reason?

All three are talented, disciplined, and successful in their fields. You may not think much of Janet Jackson's music or dancing, but she is pretty gifted and she works really hard. You may not think much of golf, basketball or any other sport, but you'd be hard pressed to say that Woods and Jordan aren't good at them.

And what exactly has Paris Hilton [done] to justify her fame?

Nothing. (I'm not going near Britney Spears on this question because she actually used to work hard at her career. Her music may be inane, but you don't get as far as she's gotten without work.)

Can you name one celebrity who is a person of color who is famous around the United States for no reason other than being famous? Someone with an immediately recognizable face?

The three you've listed can't be fairly described as famous for no reason other than being famous. Unlike Paris Hilton.

It sounds like you're ignoring the accomplishments of Tiger Woods, Janet Jackson, [and Michael Jordan, and instead focusing on their race/ethnicity to the exclusion of their proven abilities.

Connecting Sen. Obama with a vacuous no-talent underwear-loser famous for being famous is the point of the ad. Your insistence on miscegnation has missed two more damaging points: Sen. Obama has done nothing to justify his celebrity and he's just like these [an]other empty-headed, underwear-losing girl.

That last point about making him seem like a girl is, I think, another part of the "elitist, snob, effete" messaging we're going to get over the next few weeks. Drip drip drip.

[amberglow is right---they will always feminize Democratic men. And that's what they're doing.]

Not quite

"That’s where the miscegenation comes in. They could have easily used the visuals surrounding celebrities such as Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan or Janet Jackson, to make the exact claims the ad makes, but they chose not to."

You've missed the most glaring difference between your suggested group of talented, respected black celebrities and Britney Spears/Paris Hilton.

The ad was a stupid negative attack on Obama's starry appeal. But it sadly underestimated Americans' capacity for nuance by further comparing him with the arguably two most famous examples of shallow, talentless, undeserving fame.

If anything, it indirectly suggests the bind they were in to avoid racism. If they picked famous talentless black people, THAT would have been seen as racist. This leaves only white men, and you tell me what examples would have worked, since famous white men don't elicit universal scorn to the degree that women do. And if you did find one, say Don Imus or Clay Aiken, there would be too many other confusing messages. Britney and Paris are, sadly, the ultimate emblems of simple, content-free, mindless star appeal.

Even half or so of Obama supporters at HuffPo are queasily questioning Bill Press' "McCain's a Racist!" post. Meanwhile, Press and his commenters reveling in the term "bimboes" makes me a little queasy.

Obama compared HRC to Britney and Paris

I wonder why he picked Hillary Clinton, the first serious woman presidential contender, of all people as no different than the likes of Britney and Paris? Huh:

Today is Obama’s third day back on the campaign trail after his foreign trip and the Illinois senator is showing signs of fatigue. Last night at a fundraiser in Houston, he appeared to mistake his former opponent and current ally, Hillary Clinton, for the controversial pop icon, Britney Spears.

“Now we’ve got ads about Britney and Paris,” Obama said referencing McCain’s new ad comparing his opponent to the young celebrities, Spears and Hilton. “At a time when we’ve got bigger challenges than any time in our history and you’re running ads with Hillary and er – with Britney and ah Paris in it. I mean come on. The American people deserve better.”

Thank God the media was there to explain to us it was just Barack being tired. That's all. [In all honesty, I'm glad that this incident wasn't horribly distorted on the basis of gender the way race has been. It's just quite telling that the media cut Barack some slack here and that he even thought Clinton was in the same league as those two dolts in the first place]

Oh, and speaking of Americans deserving better perhaps Barack should listen to Lambert and provide bullet points, please? Oh, wait, bullet points are racist assassination triggers so obviously that's a "No."

Axelrod admits the dollar bill stuff was about race---

after they lied about that all day yesterday--

"Sen. Barack Obama's chief strategist conceded that the Democratic presidential candidate was referring to his race when he said Republicans were trying to scare voters by suggesting Obama "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills." ..." --- http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/story...

The spam filter catches "Paris Hilton"

For obvious reasons, if you think about it. Just wait, and your comment will be approved...

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Our candidates' "issues" = spam

See, even the automatic filters know that McCain's ad is junk.

What does it tell you about our two candidates' ability to elevate the national dialogue when this is what they have us discussing?

McCain Campaign thinks they're The Onion

Amberglow points to the new McCain ad.
http://www.correntewire.com/lets_help_ob...

Has any candidate in anyone's memory leaned this heavily on satire in their TV ads? Satire has its place on the stump, but in the megabucks/per/second of precious public airwaves, TV ads are reserved for a candidate's core message. Is McCain's core message to HINGE on satire? Admittedly, Obama offers up a ripe target. But with this unserious strategy, McCain demeans himself.

On the plus side for McCain, this suggests further his Paris/Britney comparison was also satire, rather than the allelged attempt to strike fear in the hearts of white parents everywhere.

they have to--to knock him off the pedestal--Hillary mocked

the same stuff too, and the GOP uses satire and mockery every single cycle--always. They're experts at it.

I love that Moses ad--if the candidate can't take pokes like that--which are much more less harmful than "empty celebrity" ones, they're not fit to be President.

And Obama used to mock himself but stopped quite a while ago.

A time and a place

Hillary knew this -- she mocked Obama not on TV but with her supporters on the stump, and beautifully, too, I might add. Again, the distinction is that McCain is spending a huge portion of his funding on two Onion-style TV ads, where for Hillary it was a little fun sparkle for a meat-and-potatoes campaign. Hillary reserved her TV ads for serious points. To me, there's a sharp line, and it's a line that separates a politican with depth and one without.

"But with...(using satire), McCain demeans himself."

Ut-oh, doesn't that mean WE are in a lot of trouble?

Last time I checked

We weren't Presidential candidates.

Though I'm writing Lambert in.

If nominated, I will not run.

If elected, I will not serve.

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Whew

so what do you think would be a serious campaign strategy for McCain that addresses this issue?

Lambert for Blog President! Or wait, is Leah Blog President?

Please

stay out of Georgia too.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Feed the hamsters...

... that work the wheels that keep the Mighty Corrente servers turning. Help us cover monthly hamster kibble anxiety:

...or provide temporary relief:

Thank you!

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.