
Gee, I wonder why? Politico (via alert reader MOBlue at TalkLeft):
After weeks of talk, the White House began circulating draft legislation Wednesday spelling out President Barack Obama's proposal that Congress surrender much of its authority over payment rates for Medicare to a new executive agency.
The proposed five-member Independent Medicare Advisory Council would be charged with making two annual reports dictating updated rates for Medicare providers including physicians, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health and durable medical equipment. Congress could block the recommendations only if lawmakers agreed within 30 days on a resolution, and the greater veto power would lie with the White House itself.
The new council would be appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate; those confirmed would serve terms of five years and would typically be physicians or have specialized expertise in health policy.
And I think we know what kind of "specialized expertise" is going to be important, don't we?
As further evidence of the shift in power, the White House appears to be making side deals already with health interests, worried about the increased power of the proposed payment-setting council.
Hospitals, for example, recently pledged billions in 10-year savings to help move along Obama’s healthcare reform agenda. But as part of that package, the hospital lobby is claiming it also won a side-bar agreement that if the new “Med PAC on steroids” is created, hospitals would enjoy special protection for the next decade.
Asked how this could be enforced given the legislative text circulated Wednesday, one lobbyist said simply the administration would “dictate” to the new council.
Well, I guess that's why the administration didn't embrace "Medicare for All." They plan to gut Medicare. Thanks, "progressives"!
Honestly, though I deplore Randall Terry's objectives, his tactics -- throwing blood, images of the dead -- have a lot to recommend them.
NOTE The implementation date is 2014. Interestingly, that's one year after the so-called "public option" would go into effect in 2013. I guess after the initial cut, where they find out how many people actually fall for the public option crap, they'll start cutting Medicare to force more people to buy insurance from the health insurance companies?
UPDATE Why do I think this is one of these horrible ideas that we all ignore because it's insane, and that turns into conventional wisdom in about six months?
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page





Comments
that is awful
how do we persuade our fellow bloggers to actually read this stuff rather than just look at Obama's press conferences????
I don't know
What I do know is that the comments sections are becoming more vociferous, and more well-reasoned, than the posts.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
lambert, what kind of reactions are you getting to your comments
that you're making around the prog blogs?
Commenters seem reasonably receptive
Ask for links, and so on. Real arguments instead of "Why do you hate ponies?"
Not at all like the primaries. And people will concede that single payer is best.
If you're worried about going out there on this issue, I wouldn't be.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
+1000
comments sections are becoming more vociferous, and more well-reasoned, than the posts.
Great, I Can Hardly Wait To See What Jeb Bush Does
with this authority in 2013.
Not that I don't expect Obama to do massive damage with it before then.
If Congress gives him this authority, it's a disgrace. Oh wait, it's already a disgrace, broken and unwilling to do its constitutional duty.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
This has been my deepest fear, that our "Dem" president who
could barely say the name of "his" party would end up being the biggest stealth candidate of all time. BushBoy ran stealthily in his first race for the presidency, on some things such as calling himself a compassionate conservative, but he clearly embraced being a Republican. Obama? We had to wait until the DNC convention to hear Obama say some things which sounded like a Democratic candidate. And that was about it!
He's turning out to be a Republican wetdream and a Dem nightmare.
Which the Republicans would recognize...
... if they hadn't gone crazy.
Just like FDR saved capitalism, Obama's going to save conservatism. Yay!
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Some Repubs do recognize what Obama is doing, such as Brooks
But attacking Obama, who is clearly not liberal or even very progressive, accomplishes two purposes. First, it paints Dems as too liberal, too progressive, too socialist, which is nothing new. Second, it moves the Overton Window
ever more rightward, If what Obama is doing can be called leftist, then any real lefty ideas can't even be discussed, they're so far from being normal American thinking.
We are so fucked. I can't believe this is happening, but it is. And now Obama must rush this thing throughNOW, NOW, NOW, or some people will notice what you've pointed out. Krugman might even notice!
But it explains the drumbeat against the expensive dying geezers who eat up all the health care dollars. NOT, but that's the flim-flam man's propaganda.
Not that into us? Hell, he wants us aging DFH
's as gone as Zelaya! And any left will be neutered as the US is trying to do to Zelaya. Gutting Medicare will serve the role of moving up the elections in Honduras; just increase the death rate for the generation which had at least some protestrers....
Being a strong, even slightly crazy opposition can serve the Repubs in their minority situation. And if the economy goes cowpie, they're set to say they told us so. Doesn't mean they don't appreciate having a Dem president suck up to them.
It's like one of those horror movies...
Don't go into the haunted house!!! But they do, they do...
It's like Versailles
took the 2008 election as a mandate to move even further right. Insane.
NOTE I think MsExPat would take issue with you on the Honduran analogy, though. See their post today.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's like Versailles took the 2008 election as a mandate"
Actually, Versailles
does not tolerate mandates from us, their servants.
They took the 2008 election as intolerable insolence. They are taking firm countermeasures.
JFK has been shot, we miss him a lot
He always knew what to do
-- Philly Cream
Clinton was the affront to Versailles. Obama
is a home boy. Insolence would have been electing McCain with that his white trash running mate - at least, that's how Versailles
would see her.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays
Very good point.
What I should have said was:
JFK has been shot, we miss him a lot
He always knew what to do
-- Philly Cream
Electing McCain wouldn't have been insolence
McCain wouldn't be worse for Versailles
.
No, the real insolence would have been Hillary. I give BTD credit for being honest, but as a forward thinking liberal analyst, not so much. His "media darling" theory had it completely wrong. It was a very bad thing that the media liked him and we are getting to see the ramifications of letting the media dictate who is chosen--not elected--to be our prezzies. A Hillary presidency would have completely undermined Versailles and perhaps fatally wounded the media in that she would have won *despite* Versailles and the media. But nope, one of the most prominent liberal intellectuals decided to support Obama because that's what Versailles wanted and supported. You reap what you sow. Obama has been propped up such that he can be a salesman for shit sandwiches. That's what the media darling theory is in practice.
Only tyrants rig elections.
Good
catch, may use it monday.
The page linked to is gone!
WHy did they do that? It’s only been a day.
"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot." - Albert Einstein
Now it's back
Wierd.
UPDATE Seems that I linked to *htm, the working URL is at *html. The server should be mapping one to the other, and that's not happening now. I wonder if that also accounts for the very few Google hits...
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi