
In dozens of top-secret talks and meetings in the White House, the most senior Bush administration officials discussed and approved specific details of how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated [tortured] by the Central Intelligence Agency, sources tell ABC News.
The so-called Principals who participated in the meetings also approved the use of "combined" interrogation techniques [torture] -- using different techniques during interrogations [torture], instead of using one method [of torture] at a time -- on terrorist suspects who proved difficult to break, sources said.
But this is the first time sources have disclosed that a handful of the most senior advisers in the White House explicitly approved the details of the [torture] program. According to multiple sources, it was members of the Principals Committee that not only discussed specific plans and specific interrogation methods, but approved them.
Lawyers in the Justice Department [good Christianists all, I assume] had written a classified memo, which was extensively reviewed, that gave formal legal authority to government interrogators to use the "enhanced" questioning tactics [torture] on suspected terrorist prisoners. The August 2002 memo, signed by then head of the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee, was referred to as the so-called "Golden Shield" for CIA agents, who worried they would be held liable if the harsh interrogations [torture] became public.
According to a top official, Ashcroft asked aloud after one meeting: "Why are we talking about this [torture] in the White House? History will not judge this kindly."
Then-National Security Advisor Rice, sources said, was decisive. Despite growing policy concerns -- shared by Powell -- that the [torture] program was harming the image of the United States abroad, sources say she did not back down, telling the CIA: "This is your baby. Go do it."
So much of the Village
depravity and corruption has been known for so long by anyone who's been paying attention, that it seems pointless to write anything at all when our famously free press finally gets round to being shocked, shocked--that the bar has been lowered all the way to the Ninth Circle of Hell.
Truly, as Krugman says, this is the age of the anti-Cassandra.
Of course they all knew about it, and not only did they enjoy it, they probably passed around all the juicy bits from the videos to their fellow 24/7 fans.
Let's not forget that the flip side of Versailles
was the Bastille, shall we?
So, now can we talk about the gulags and the disappeared?
No, I didn't think so. Sorry.
NOTE Condi for Vice President! A vote for torture is a vote to keep the country safe and free!
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
...And If--No, When...
...the Village
Media* don't touch this one either (hey, we gotta do post-game wrap-up on Petraeus!), I don't wanna hear a single person, especially on "our" side, complain that the media is "lazy", that they're "not doing their job".
the phrase you're looking for would be "the media is COMPLICIT."
hi--I'd like to make reservations at the Hague, please? how many? oh, thousands. thousands and thousands...
*and yes, I'm well aware that ABC's about as Village Media as you can get. I'm just saying if it doesn't get a news cycle, and you know it won't, that it will be as if it never happened. or that it's "old news...let's move forward!"
As Atrios muses, if something is reported but not Talked About,
is it really news?
Well, yes, it is--it's just not known by many. And if it's not talked about on the evening news and especially the cable news shows, not repeated and "analyzed" it doesn't make it to the level of "important."
Compare, for a wildly disparate example, the Downing Street Memo and, from the current campaign, Hillary's Bosnia visit.
Which of these was more concentrated on by the MCMers (member of the MCM, Mainstream Corporate Media), got more time on the evening news broadcasts, was more discussed on cable "news" shows and covered on the Sunday talk shows?
It's almmost funny--riduculous even.
Except it's so terribly sad and dangerous to our nation and society.
Gte ready for this
What comes next is the declassification of a memo saying that some Dems, such as Rockefeller, Daschle and Harman were all in on it too.
OxyCon
addendum
this story was No. 1 on Memeorandum for most of this morning (although "Discussion" came from almost exclusively DFHs
).
now, it is GONE. like it never existed...
Anna Granfors, that is really scary! In days of yore,
that is, pre-primary, TPM would be all over this, asking readers to notify Josh and his gang of how the story was being covered locally, noting good editorials....
--the BusyBeaverBrigades at DKos would be researching their little fingers to the bone, checking out who was where when, finding dots, making connections (impressive they were, in Days of Yore!)....
--new blogs would emerge,and merge, to ensure all the new information was collected in easy to find place, as for the Downing Street Memos....
--blogger after blogger would be commenting, asking when the MCM would be focussing on this, keeping the story alive, at least on the web. asking readers to contact their representatives....
Alas! Alack! The Days of Yore! Bring us again The Days of Yore!