Ohio and Florida Republicans, aided by "Justice" department, already planning to steal election 2008 with voter caging tactic

The essential McClatchy:

Ohio and Florida, which provided the decisive electoral votes for President Bush's two razor-thin national election triumphs, have enacted laws that election experts say will help Republicans impede Democratic-leaning minorities from voting in 2008.

Backers of the new laws say they're aimed at curbing vote fraud. But the statutes also could facilitate a controversial Republican tactic known as ``vote caging,'' which the GOP attempted in Ohio and Florida in 2004 before public disclosures foiled the efforts, said Joseph Rich, a former Justice Department voting rights chief in the Bush administration who's now with the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights.

Caging, used in the past to target poor minorities in heavily Democratic precincts, entails sending mass mailings to certain voters and then using the undelivered letters to compile lists of voters for eligibility challenges.

As the high-stakes ground war escalates heading into next year's elections, Republicans have led the charge for an array of revisions to state voting rights laws, especially in key battleground states. Republican political appointees in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division have endorsed some of these measures.

And best of all, the Ohio law makes all voters pay for the Republican's voter caging:

In Ohio, which swung the 2004 election to Bush, new Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said in a phone interview that an election law passed last year and signed by former Republican Gov. Bob Taft effectively ``institutionalized'' vote caging.

The law requires that the state's 88 county election boards send non-forwardable, pre-election notices to all 7.8 million registered Ohio voters at least 60 days before the election. Undelivered letters are public record, she said, meaning that effectively, ``now the counties are paying for'' the data needed to compile challenge lists.

In addition, Brunner said, the law toughened voter ID requirements and ``took away rights of some voters to be heard about whether or not their registration was valid.''

In the past, Ohio voters were entitled to an official notice and a hearing before an election board could declare them ineligible, but the new law says that the board can make that decision without notice. A disqualified voter who shows up at the polls must demonstrate that he's fixed any eligibility problem or opt for filing a provisional ballot that may not count.

So now the Republicans can make you wait eight hours in line, and only then tell you that they've stolen your right to vote! Nice.

Brunner said the new law has left her feeling ``like being in a sword fight with one hand behind your back.'' She said she's sought, ``while working within the framework of preventing fraud,'' to make it ``as easy as possible for people who are eligible to participate.''

The Bush Court is going to take on these cases next term. At this point, we know the playbook, and there's no reason to expect Justice from them.

NOTE Of course, since the Bush Court, as currently composed, is the "fruit of the poisonous tree" of Bush v. Gore--written by Scalia in order to get judges on the court who would vote with him, and not decided on the merits--it is no longer legitimate, and its decisions are no longer legitimate.

NOTE * Via the equally essential TPM.

Comments

Maybe if we'd had an Eisenhower in the White House in 2000,

Bush wouldn't be there now.

Fifty years ago, Ike watched a riot happening in Arkansas. The state governor, Orval Faubus, called out the National Guard to stop nine Black students from attending high school on September 4th.

Cops smuggled the kids in on September 23rd after Faubus deactivated the Guard on September 20th, but a riot broke out: 1,000 or so whites (I suspect largely males, probably young, and mostly dropouts, but that's just my suspicion) attacked the school, beat the living daylights out of several black reporters, and forced the police to remove the students lest they too be not just assaulted but battered.

That was Little Rock, the September 1947.

What did the President do?
He federalized the Guard and mobilized troops to keep the rioters at bay while the children went to school.

Integration by force -- something he might've learnt from his time in the Service (y'all do remember that Ike was a General in WWII, right, and that he served under Pershing along the Mexican border at the beginning of his military career? Yeah, the man knew something about the utility of confrontation) -- was Ike's response to unAmerican behavior.

Maybe Clinton should've taken the same tack when confronted with the riots in Miami in November and December 2000.

Maybe we'd've been able to go on living in America.

Maybe 11SEP01 would've never happened, or Tora Bora wouldn't've been sold out to subcontractors who let bin Laden run away if it had.

Maybe Pat Tillman wouldn't've been gunned down to shut him up about the heroin trade in the Army in Afghanistan.

Probably we wouldn't be at war in Iraq, because Cheney and the Oil Cartel wouldn't be running the country.

Maybe Blackwater wouldn't be a multimillion dollar government-funded gang of hired killers.

Maybe Iraq wouldn't be a complete meltdown.

Maybe we wouldn't have idiots in DC threatening Iran.
(Will W figure out a way to declare war on North Korea too?) Has he got enough time? Are there energy resources in the gulf between Korea and Japan Cheney thinks he could corral? Or would it furnish an entryway to Russian oilfields?

Would we, likely, have universal health care now? I dunno; I suspect the Insurance Industry's antipathy to it -- and their lobbying power fueled by all that corporate moolah can still keep that from happening for a few more years.
But as we're seeing now, health care costs keep rising.
The burden of those costs keeps having a huge, and negative, impact on our industries -- manufacturing not least. Single Payer would help GM; why not help the US?

Maybe if we'd had an Eisenhower in 2000, we wouldn't have seen Dan Rather sacrificed to corporate greed in 2005.

Maybe Rupert Murdoch wouldn't be able to own all the papers and all the TV channels he wants.

Maybe Sumner Redstone would have to play by the rules.

Maybe the credit crunch would've gone a different way.

Maybe the economy would be growing if all those idiots hadn't screamed "socialism" at the idea of single-payer health care (aka medicare for everybody) back in Clinton's first term.

I don't know.

But sometimes I wonder.

What if the rioters who stopped the vote counts in Florida had been confronted?


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Feed the hamsters...

... that work the wheels that keep the Mighty Corrente servers turning. Help us cover monthly hamster kibble anxiety:

...or provide temporary relief:

Thank you!