PB2.0--the saga continues

Credit to all (and thanks to VL for being such a good host). Mistakes are mine. Please pardon me if I misrepresent your views or efforts.

Historical wrap-up: PB1.0 relied on the inherent goodness of human beings for honesty and fairness. Whoopsie.

The issues:
1. “Why should we post?” — principles, “we believe”, “progressive”
2. “Where should we post?” — decentralized structure
3. “How should we post?” — the procedures
4. “Who should post?” — those who adhere to the principles
5. “What should we post?” — truthful narrative

Why should we post? Principles

Who are we: PB2.0 is an honest broker on behalf of the progressive movement.

Mission statement: To make the world better through progressive efforts and advocacy of values, ideals, and merchandise. (Heh. That last one is a joke.)

Core values: Honesty, transparency, fair play, intellectual rigor, usefulness, humor, earthiness, hands-on, decentralization, issue/party/geographical ivariance

Methods: organizing, advocating, persuading, shining a light, documenting, improving, engaging, and acting

Where should we post? Decentralized structure

Form: A business entity and webring, each reinforcing core values in deed as well as word.
1. Creative Corporation
2. PB2.0 franchise or brand

I. The business of PB2.0 is handled by a Creative Corporation, a business entity with a structure that reflects progressive values such as transparency, profit sharing, social investment, ceiling on profits, continued reinvestment, and so on. The corporation will have as board of directors people with a material stake in practicing the goals embodied in the charter and mission statement of the corporation.

Risk, such as expenses, will be handled as check and balance. Meaning, don’t write a check if the checkbook doesn’t balance AKA, operation on a cash basis. The only exception to this may be loans made under a social investment agreement.

Rewards, defined as net profit and access to greater exposure, will be shared according to a bounty system. Basically, pay the bills, and that includes contributors, reinvestment, social investment in others, dividends, and then anything left is parceled out to non-profits as one-time donations.

Sadly, money is never just money and it needs to be treated as openly and fairly as possible.

All financial information about the business entity should be always available, including hit rates, ad rates, and other measures of success. Click a button that says, “Our Vast Fortunes” and get the PDFs of these reports.

The Creative Corporation also handles the process of joining PB2.0 and gaining the right to be an officially branded site with all the benefits and responsibilities.

To researched (is there a lawyer in the house?):

-Can a Creative Corporation even be created?
-What state would accept incorporation (LLC or s-corp, let’s keep it simple) based not primarily on maximizing profitability, but on these other values we’ve discussed?
-What are the most basic rules to add or subtract stakeholders? For example, if contributors on Corrente or other sites wish to become stakeholders, do they buy a seat (buying here doesn’t mean writing a check, though that could be an option; working it off, trading services, etc., can also be a means to purchase)?

II. Corrente becomes the flagship member of the PB2.0, a webring of federated blogs

A. Shared revenue or risk and reward is handled by the Creative Corp

B. Shared content

Once a site or blogger comes on board, they receive member premiums, including a seat at the table, widget with headline feeds and alerts, as well as press outreach, and so on.

C. The imprimatur of PB2.0 also means that this site/blogger takes on the responsibility to be an honest broker. This is embodied in the mission statement of the organization, as well as its business entity (Creative Corp) and procedures. Lots more to do here, esp. regarding how do we know we're being honest?

How should we post? The procedures

Lots more questions, but let’s start here.

Procedures must be verifiable.

Procedures are about creating content; they’re useless unless they are practical and workable.
-Minimum lengths
-Point/Counterpoint: Box with links “Opposition in a Nutshell” (and my own favorite, “Opposition in a Nutbar”)
-Editorial standards
-Moderation

Who should post? Those who adhere to the principles

What does PB2.0 offer to franchisees?
Imprimatur of the honest progressive broker
Tools (widgets, downloads, etc.)
Shared goals, community
Press, higher visibility

What should we post? Truthful narrative

PB2.0 can offer a set of contexts for posts, but the author determines which context for his or her article.

- quick takes: just a link and a little text as to why people should follow the link
- background pieces
- taking action pieces
- critical analysis pieces
- advocacy
- vegetable buttcracks
====

I have more on the business side of all I can add if you want it.

UPDATED: Source banking as another resource to offer readers and franchisees; I've got nothing in here about decisionmaking process (yes, there should be one and I'm thinking one chair-one vote, with the usual corporate structure to set agenda, but the corporate offices are rotated more than once a year). Another big topic.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We might look to open source projects

Many of them -- linux, Python, drupal -- operate on a benevolent dictator principle. Others do not -- I think the Apache project is one such.

I think that would be a very good place to look for precedents, both for a corporate structure, and a governance structure.

Also, although I think the webring concept is the right place to be digging, I'm not sure that a webring is itself the technical solution -- if for no other reason than that the term webring is encumbered by trademark.

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

That's a good idea

Open source as framework. That's got some appeal to me as it also subtly enforces the idea that the tehcnology is a means to an end. So is the content of this effort: it's all about making things better. That doesn't happen simply because someone wishes it so, no matter how many footnotes.

That is for me a huge deal. this isn't about how I "feel" or my sense of righteousness (oaky, a little bit of that), it's about actually making here and now a little less crappy. Say, 2% less crappy. "PB2.0: 2% crappier than those other guys."

Huh. Not quite as snappy as I hoped.

If not webring, WebBread? WebPudding? WebCorn? WebGourd? WebPretzel? If we want to get all 2.0, we could ditch the web idea all together and go for a different term that implies interconnectedness or something? High canopy? Double helix? Neo-Free Matrix?

Now with 50% less crap, and naughty vegetables!

In a webring, as I understand it technically, the members of the ring all use a common navigation bar of some sort, so people can go "around" the ring from one site to the next.

I like the decentralization of the concept, but I'm also wondering if something richer might be a good idea, too. What I would like to see added is headlines of some sort, possibly access to the source bank, and an alert system of some kind... Just brainstorming. (That's why I'm more in the widget mode, but that might require a central server... and maybe the webring doesn't. Or it might be possible to propagate more along the webring-or-whatever than just a navigation link.

At this point, I think the technical issues are the least of our worries. I think governance and procedures (the Dogme discussion) are more important.

That and starting to recruit some like-minded bloggers, if any. Unless we are in "if you build it they will come" mode (which a widget would help with).

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

Incorporation

Somebody should look into Vermont for incorporation. The state has just initiated some new thing that permits sort of discorporate entities, intending to be sort of the Delaware of Internet-enabled or Internet-based small business. I didn't pay much attention to the news stories about it because it's way over my head, but the intention is to make it easier than most other states to do incorporate a business with no brick-and-mortar component at all.

Might give a thought, too, as to whether it would be possible to incoporate as a non-profit. I don't think that would prevent paying salaries to blog owners if they were members of a board or something out of the revenues from advertising.

Actually, it's tougher to incorporate as a non-profit...

... though the idea of forming a new religion has appeal.

Where did you read about the VT entities?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

regarding how do we know we’re being honest?

Oh, my. Once the big-men-on-campus bloggers started being about money, their content went out the window, and their scruples along with it, IMHO. Once you're selling your product, your product is for sale. And the highest bidder eventually wants to call the shots.

I don't know how we could advocate to get money out of politics one one hand, and try to profit off it on the other.
I would not trust PB 2.0 if it were a for-profit format.

Yes, everyone needs to make a living--but since politics affects us all, the last thing we need is another layer of people selling us.

Elliot Lake

No one can be perfectly honest all the time

That's why many people have recommended PB2.0 have procedures and transparency---to stop the corruption by having people call it when they see it. And to show where the money comes from and where it's going.

PB2.0 isn't just about politics, it's about lots of stuff. Regardless of how you want to label it, it takes resources---money---to operate and maintain. Even a non-profit takes time to manage, even more time since the paperwork is greater than with a plain old s-corp.

People should be paid for their work. They should be paid a decent wage for that work as well, but practically speaking, unless lambert sells a kidney on ebay, we're not going to be able to ffer anyone decent money for their efforts in the near term. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't get something---it takes time to maintain servers and program crap. It takes time to make sure a website has the ability to fend off attacks. It takes time to write good posts. It takes time to moderate comments. If someone is going to make a commitment to do these things and follow through on it, then they should earn a bit of dosh.

That way, maybe we can get more people involved who need money to buy the time to be involved. Not everyone can afford to work for nothing.

It is progressive to pay people a decent wage. It is progressive to make it possible to include people across class divisions. It is progressive to remain as transparent about business operations.

Plus, cash donations to causes is a way to push a progressive agenda forward.

So do you have a proposal?

I have a hard time seeing how Amazon ads, for example, would involve a "highest bidder." Or golf-shirts....

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

Help Corrente ...

... keep the heat on!

Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.

No PayPal Account required! Thank you!

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.